Literature DB >> 33356806

Clinical importance of serum secreted clusterin in predicting invasive breast cancer and treatment responses.

Qing-Feng Chen1, Lei Chang1, Qun Su2, Ying Zhao2, Bin Kong1.   

Abstract

Enhanced serum secreted clusterin (sCLU) protein was associated with progression, poor prognosis and chemotherapy sensitivity evaluation in malignant patients. However, the clinical significance of serum sCLU protein levels in patients with invasive breast cancer (IBC) is unknown. In this study, the serum sCLU protein in 2648 patients with IBC was detected. The diagnostic value and treatment responses of serum sCLU protein in patients with IBC were also performed. The results showed that the serum sCLU protein level was significantly higher in IBC patients compared to the healthy controls (P < 0.0001), and strongly correlated with higher clinical tumor stage (P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001), shorter overall survival (OS) (P = 0.032) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.029), respectively. Using the cutoff value of 18.46 μg/mL, the sensitivity and specificity were 86.26% and 73.46% to separate IBC patients from noncancerous and healthy controls. The postoperative patients showed lower serum sCLU levels compared to the preoperative patients (P = 0.003). The chemoresistant patients showed higher serum sCLU levels compared to the chemosensitive patients (P < 0.001). These data indicated that serum sCLU levels are effective indicators for diagnosis and chemotherapy sensitivity evaluation in patients with IBC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Invasive breast cancer; chemotherapy; clusterin; diagnosis; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33356806      PMCID: PMC8806267          DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2020.1868732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioengineered        ISSN: 2165-5979            Impact factor:   3.269


Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Chinese women, with 12.2% of all newly diagnosed breast cancers and 9.6% of all deaths from breast cancer worldwide [1]. With the improvement of early diagnosis technology of breast cancer, 5–10% of patients still have distant metastases at the time of diagnosis [2]. Standard chemotherapy and hormonal therapy options can not significantly reduce recurrence and metastasis, which results in 90% of the deaths in breast cancer patients [2-4]. Numerous prognostic factors are frequently used for making clinical decisions in breast cancer [5,6], but they are not routinely used in clinical practice because of their certain limitations and defect [7,8]. Therefore, it is urgent to find highly sensitive and specific molecular markers for diagnosis, prognostic judgment and evaluation of treatment response in patients with breast cancer. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) serves as a co-target for dual/pan-EGFR-inhibitors in breast cancer [9]. Current evidence indicates associations between low baseline serum-EGFR and shorter survival or reduced response to treatment in patients with advanced breast cancer, especially in patients with estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive tumors. However, the prognostic and predictive value of EGFR and EGFR-ligands in blood has only been investigated in highly selected subsets of breast cancer patients and most studies were small [9-11]. The non-coding RNA sequences have been shown to be dysregulated in breast cancer. Despite showing immense promise, miRNAs have not been successfully implemented in the clinical setting due to a lack of a standardized approach which has resulted in conflicting results [12]. However, further studies are required to specifically isolate cancer exosomes from patient plasma and establish exosome microRNA signatures indicative of breast cancer. Following a diagnosis of breast cancer, measurement of serum CA 15–3 or CEA or uPA/PAI-1 and Oncotype DX may be used for determining prognosis and identifying lymph node-negative patients who may be spared from having to receive adjuvant chemotherapy [13]. However, the sensitivity and specificity of these biomarkers are relatively low for breast cancer. Clusterin (CLU), a highly conserved 78–80 kDa heterodimeric glycoprotein, widely exists in a variety of tissues, cells and body fluids. CLU exists in at least two sets of isoforms: The secreted forms (sCLU) (∼75-80 kDa) and non-secreted nuclear forms (nCLU) (∼45-60 kDa). sCLU exhibits pro-survival functions [14-17] and nCLU appears to be pro-apoptotic functions [18,19]. sCLU is overexpressed in many types of malignant tumors, and inforced sCLU expression could promote carcinogenesis and tumor progression [20-23]. In addition, sCLU was also used as a marker to evaluate diagnosis and metastasis potential in many malignant tumors [24-27]. Previous study showed that sCLU was overexpressed in osteosarcoma (OS), and higher sCLU expression was related to metastasis and chemoresistance [28]. Higher preoperative sCLU expression in breast cancer was associated with CAF resistance and TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells in vitro [29,30]. Furthermore, targeting sCLU inhibited tumor growth and metastasis in breast cancer cells in vivo [31]. In this study, we evaluated whether serum sCLU levels could be used as a biomarker for the diagnosis and evaluating treatment responses in breast cancer patients with higher sensitivity and specificity.

Materials and Methods

Patients and serum samples

The patients with invasive breast cancer (IBC), noncancerous patients and healthy controls were collected between Jan 2012 and March 2014. The patients were divided into two groups: the first group was the control group and the IBC patients that underwent surgery or chemotherapy. Among them,1998 patients with pathologically confirmed IBC, 180 patients with pathologically confirmed noncancerous breast lesions and 170 healthy controls. The clinicopathological parameters were evaluated. The patients without pathologic diagnosis or with multiple cancers, or with adjuvant radiotherapy, or lost after operation were not included in the study. Plasma samples were collected and stored at −20°C from all participants. The clinicopathologic characteristics of the IBC patients were summarized in (Table 1).
Table 1.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with invasive breast cancer

CharacteristicStatic group (n = 1998)Dynamic group (n = 650)
Surgery (n = 160)Chemotherapy (n = 490)
Age (years)   
<5092373178
≥50107587312
Tumor size (Diameter)   
≤ 2 cm2881836
>2 cm≤5 cm1350106370
>5 cm3603684
Histopathological Grades   
G12301961
G21478121348
G32902081
Clinical Stages   
I2081441
II97080231
III82066218
Lymph metastasis   
Yes118094316
No81866174
Distant metastasis   
Yes1151964
No1883141426
Subtype   
Luminal A3202159
Luminal B111192293
HER2 (+)2111648
Triple negative3563190
Menopause   
Yes79870216
No120090274
ER   
Positive(+)1313102322
Negative(-)68558168
PR   
Positive(+)101791286
Negative(-)98169204
Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with invasive breast cancer sThe second groups were the newly diagnosed IBC patients (n = 650), of which 160 patients received surgery and 490 patients underwent chemotherapy. For surgical patients, serum samples were collected 24 h before surgery, 48 h-72 h days after surgery, respectively. For chemotherapy patients, the baseline serum samples were collected before the first chemotherapy cycle and subsequent serum samples in any treatment cycle. All patients follow the standard chemotherapy regimen. Two milliliters of whole blood was collected and centrifuged and then stored at −20°C. This study was approved by the affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. Written informed consent was obtained from each individual or patient.

ELISA detection of serum sCLU

Serum sCLU protein was detected and calculated using an ELISA kit (Boster Biotechnology Company, Wuhan, China). The procedures were carried out according to the introduction of the manufacturer. All serum were stored at −80°C before measurements were taken, and both the standards and samples were run in triplicate. The OD450 was calculated by subtracting the background value, and standard curves were plotted using the CurveExpert 1.3 software program. Each sample was repeated at least 3 times.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS.22 software. The t-test or the rank-sum test was used to evaluate the statistical differences. The Youden index, calculated as (sensitivity + specificity-1) was estimated to determine optimal cutoff values. The sensitivity and specificity were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The associations between disease-free survival and overall survival and sCLU levels were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard regression models. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Plasma levels of sCLU in IBC patients

The serum sCLU was assessed using ELISA in 1998 IBC patients,180 noncancerous patients and 170 healthy controls. The data showed that the serum sCLU protein levels were significantly higher in patients with IBC (79.6 ± 11.5) μg/mL than those of the healthy controls (10.4 ± 4.8) μg/mL and noncancerous controls (19.5 ± 5.6) μg/mL (P < 0.0001, respectively), indicating that serum sCLU protein levels could be used as a biomarker for the IBC diagnosis.

Serum sCLU levels and clinicopathological features in IBC patients

In the first cohort of 1998 participants, sCLU level was higher in IBC patients with higher clinical stages (III)(92.6 μg/mL ± 13.8 μg/mL) and lymph metastasis (89.7 μg/mL ± 12.6 μg/mL) compared to the lower clinical stages (I+ II) (56.4 μg/mL ± 12.8 μg/mL) and without lymph metastasis (60.4 μg/mL ± 11.8 μg/mL) (Table 2, P < 0.0001, respectively). No relationship was found between levels of serum sCLU and age, tumor size, grade, distant metastasis, subtype, menopause, etc. (Table 2). These observations indicated that the progression of IBC is associated with increased serum sCLU levels.
Table 2.

Relationship between sCLU levels and clinicopathological factors in 1998 IBC patients

GroupsCLU level (μg/mL)P-value
Age (years) 0.089
<5078.9 ± 11.6 
≥5081.3 ± 11.7 
Tumor size 0.163
≤ 2 cm77.7 ± 10.3 
>2 cm80.4 ± 11.5 
Grade 0.251
G1-G178.3 ± 12.4 
G380.6 ± 11.8 
Clinical Stages <0.0001
I–II56.4 ± 12.8 
III92.6 ± 13.8 
Lymph metastasis <0.0001
Yes89.7 ± 12.6 
No60.4 ± 11.8 
Distant metastasis 0.173
Yes82.6 ± 13.5 
No78.4 ± 12.7 
Subtype 0.494
Luminal A78.5 ± 12.7 
Luminal B77.6 ± 13.1 
HER2 (+)81.6 ± 13.6 
Triple negative82.6 ± 12.7 
Menopause 0.560
Yes79.0 ± 12.5 
No79.8 ± 12.2 
ER 0.137
Positive(+)81.6 ± 12.5 
Negative(-)78.4 ± 12.5 
PR 0.382
Positive(+)78.4 ± 11.8 
Negative(-)80.9 ± 12.6 
Relationship between sCLU levels and clinicopathological factors in 1998 IBC patients We also found that serum sCLU protein levels >18.46 μg/mL would predict IBC patients with 86.26% sensitivity and 73.46% specificity. The AUC was 0.87 (Figure 1). Log-rank test of OS curves revealed that high serum sCLU levels were associated with the shorter OS (P = 0.032, Figure 2a) and DFS in IBC patients (P = 0.029, Figure 2b).
Figure 1.

Serum sCLU levels in IBC and controls. Serum sCLU yielded an AUC value of 0.87 in distinguishing IBC from controls

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Percent survival rate was stratified by serum sCLU level. A, overall survival of patients;B, progression-free survival

Serum sCLU levels in IBC and controls. Serum sCLU yielded an AUC value of 0.87 in distinguishing IBC from controls Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Percent survival rate was stratified by serum sCLU level. A, overall survival of patients;B, progression-free survival Detection of serum sCLU levels in newly diagnosed IBC patients Using cutoff value 18.46 μg/mL as the positive value for surgical patients, a statistically significant association was observed between preoperative and postoperative serum sCLU levels (63.65 μg/mL vs. 35.14 μg/mL, P = 0.003; Figure 3a). In addition, serum sCLU levels were significantly higher in the chemoresistant patients than the chemosensitive patients (673.4 μg/mL vs. 292.7 μg/mL, p < 0.001, Figure 3 B).
Figure 3.

ELISA detection of serum sCLU levels. A, Surgical patients; B, Chemotherapy patients

ELISA detection of serum sCLU levels. A, Surgical patients; B, Chemotherapy patients

Discussion

In this study, we first detected the serum sCLU protein levels in IBC patients, noncancerous patients, and healthy controls and assess its diagnostic value and treatment responses in patients with IBC. The results showed that enhanced sCLU protein levels were found in patients with IBC than that in controls. Using 18.46 μg/mL as the cutoff value, the sCLU had a higher sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of IBC, indicating that serum sCLU protein levels could be as a biomarker for the diagnosis of IBC. Clusterin encodes a 449 amino acid precursor polypeptide which is cleaved to form the mature secreted clusterin protein which functions to scavenge and chaperone damaged proteins in the extracellular compartment of tissues [18,19]. Other functional variants of clusterin are generated by alternative splicing of the mRNA, producing a cytoplasmic variant, which can translocate to the nucleus and influence cell survival [19]. Clusterin is not detected in normal tissue, but overexpressed in many cancer tissues or cells [20-23]; therefore, the apparent ubiquitous presence of clusterin has the potential for it to be used as a biomarker for health and in disease. Previous reports have correlated clusterin expression with cell responses to stress [32], cell damage recovery [33], senescence [34], tumorigenesis and apoptosis [35]. Up-regulation of clusterin in breast cancers has been previously reported, but whether serum sCLU is enhanced still unknown. A previous study has reported that reduced sCLU might reflect poor outcomes of biliary atresia patients and have potential as a novel biomarker for the disease severity following Kasai-operation [36]. In human colon cancer, significant increase of sCLU in the serum of CRC patients as compared with controls; in addition, sCLU in blood showed a 55.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity [37]. In HCC and prostate Cancer patients, serum clusterin was significantly elevated, suggesting that serum sCLU is a potential novel serum marker for HCC and prostate Cancer [38,39]. In this report, we have demonstrated that serum sCLU levels were higher in IBC patients, especially in advanced IBC (stage III) and with lymph metastasis compared to the early-stage (stage I–II) and without lymph metastasis. Furthermore, the patients with higher sCLU levels have short survival than the patients with lower sCLU levels, suggesting that serum sCLU could be a useful prognostic marker in IBC. Expression patterns of clusterin at different stages indicate that this protein functions in the maintenance and/or progression of tumors, but it is not clear whether it plays a role in tumor establishment. Elevated production of clusterin antigen, if secreted from tumor cells, may be detected in body fluids, such as serum. Therefore, serum sCLU could decrease after resection of tumors containing high expression of clusterin antigen. In our study, serum levels of sCLU protein showed a statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative patients, and lower serum levels of sCLU protein were shown in the postoperative patients than the preoperative patients. These data indicated that serum levels of sCLU protein could predict the surgery responses of patients with IBC. sCLU expression is documented to lead to broad-based resistance to anticancer agents and other unrelated chemotherapeutic agents, and targeted death-inducing molecules, tumor necrosis factor, Fas and TRAIL, or histone deacetylase inhibitors can also be mediated by sCLU [40]. Mechanistically sCLU could mediate multidrug resistance to a broad range of unrelated chemotherapeutic agents. sCLU is also readily induced by therapeutic agents and confers survival advantage to cancer cells [41]. Therefore, sCLU ablation via specific antisense oligonucleotides as a means to chemosensitization toward clinically established drugs could be a potent strategy to overcome drug resistance. Serum sCLU levels could be effectively reduced with effective chemotherapeutic agents [42]. In the study, we found that serum sCLU protein was higher in the chemoresistant patients compared to the chemosensitive patients. These data demonstrated that serum sCLU levels could predict the chemotherapy responses in patients with IBC. However, some limitations exist in the study that some clinicopathologic data were not enough.

Conclusion

The study aimed to investigate the relationship between serum secreted clusterin (sCLU) protein and clinicopathological characteristics and chemotherapy sensitivity evaluation in IBC. It was demonstrated that the serum sCLU protein level was significantly higher in IBC patients, and strongly correlated with higher clinical tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, shorter overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS). Serum sCLU protein was also higher in the chemoresistant IBC patients. Therefore, detection of serum of sCLU could help to predict prognosis and monitor the treatment responses. However, there are a number of challenges to overcome in order to successfully translate these promising laboratory results into efficacious therapies in clinical practice. Click here for additional data file.
  41 in total

1.  Survivorship care visits in a high-risk population of breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Sarah J Skuli; Jennifer Y Sheng; Elissa T Bantug; Nelli Zafman; Carol Riley; Jessica M Ruck; Katherine C Smith; Claire F Snyder; Karen L Smith; Vered Stearns; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Intracellular and secreted forms of clusterin are elevated early in Alzheimer's disease and associate with both Aβ and tau pathology.

Authors:  Claire E Shepherd; Andrew J Affleck; Anita Y Bahar; Francine Carew-Jones; Glenda M Halliday
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 3.  Exosome-encapsulated microRNAs as circulating biomarkers for breast cancer.

Authors:  Doireann P Joyce; Michael J Kerin; Róisín M Dwyer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) extracellular domain levels are associated with progression-free survival in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer receiving lapatinib monotherapy.

Authors:  Allan Lipton; Kim Leitzel; Suhail M Ali; Walter Carney; Greg Platek; Klaudia Steplewski; Ron Westlund; Robert Gagnon; Anne-Marie Martin; Julie Maltzman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Secreted clusterin in colon tumor cell models and its potential as diagnostic marker for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A M Rodríguez-Piñeiro; A García-Lorenzo; S Blanco-Prieto; P Alvarez-Chaver; F J Rodríguez-Berrocal; M Páez de la Cadena; V S Martínez-Zorzano
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.176

6.  Clinical Features, Prognosis, Diagnostic Approaches and Treatment of Multiple Primary Malignancies in the Digestive System.

Authors:  Akashi Ikubo; Shohei Matsufuji; Yoshihiro Morifuji; Hiroki Koga; Tomonari Kobarai; Naohiko Kouya; Masashi Sakai; Ryuichirou Samejima; Katsuo Kojima; Masanobu Tabuchi; Seiji Yunotani
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  Clusterin as a possible predictor for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy with intermediate Gleason scores: a preliminary report.

Authors:  M R Pins; J E Fiadjoe; F Korley; M Wong; A W Rademaker; B Jovanovic; T K Yoo; J M Kozlowski; A Raji; X J Yang; C Lee
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Clusterin as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Sahar M Hazzaa; Osama M Elashry; Ibtesam K Afifi
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 9.  Could the glycosylation analysis of seminal plasma clusterin become a novel male infertility biomarker?

Authors:  Ewa Janiszewska; Ewa Maria Kratz
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 2.609

10.  sCLU as prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Jinfeng Ma; Weiliang Gao; Jisheng Gao
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.269

View more
  7 in total

1.  Breast cancer risk coordinators: Artificial intelligence-based density measurement and Mullerian-inhibiting substance.

Authors:  Şevki Pedük; Sevcan Sarıkaya; Mustafa Tekin
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Circulating Clusterin Levels and Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ali Beheshti Namdar; Mona Kabiri; Homan Mosanan Mozaffari; Elham Aminifar; Hassan Mehrad-Majd
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  Cytoplasmic Clusterin Suppresses Lung Cancer Metastasis by Inhibiting the ROCK1-ERK Axis.

Authors:  Shaobo Huang; Xu Li; Weiqi Gu; Xiaoyi Li; Jingjing Zhao; Jueheng Wu; Junchao Cai; Xianming Feng; Tianyu Tao
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  Long Noncoding RNA 00472: A Novel Biomarker in Human Diseases.

Authors:  Dan-Yang Ren; Xin-Rong Yuan; Cai-Xia Tu; Jian-Ling Shen; Yun-Wei Li; Ai-Hua Yan; Yi Ru; Hui-Yun Han; Yan-Ming Yang; Yan Liu; Hui-Ying Li
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Quantitative Plasma Proteomics to Identify Candidate Biomarkers of Relapse in Pediatric/Adolescent Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Ombretta Repetto; Laura Caggiari; Mariangela De Zorzi; Caterina Elia; Lara Mussolin; Salvatore Buffardi; Marta Pillon; Paola Muggeo; Tommaso Casini; Agostino Steffan; Christine Mauz-Körholz; Maurizio Mascarin; Valli De Re
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 6.  The Influence of Clusterin Glycosylation Variability on Selected Pathophysiological Processes in the Human Body.

Authors:  Ewa Janiszewska; Agnieszka Kmieciak; Monika Kacperczyk; Aleksandra Witkowska; Ewa Maria Kratz
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 7.310

7.  Construction of 2DE Patterns of Plasma Proteins: Aspect of Potential Tumor Markers.

Authors:  Stanislav Naryzhny; Natalia Ronzhina; Elena Zorina; Fedor Kabachenko; Nikolay Klopov; Victor Zgoda
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 6.208

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.