Literature DB >> 33355635

Physician Confidence in Neck Ultrasonography for Surveillance of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Recurrence.

Kevin J Kovatch1, David Reyes-Gastelum2, Jennifer A Sipos3, Elaine M Caoili4, Ann S Hamilton5, Kevin C Ward6, Megan R Haymart2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Neck ultrasonography, a mainstay of long-term surveillance for recurrence of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), is routinely used by endocrinologists, general surgeons, and otolaryngologists; however, physician confidence in their ability to use ultrasonography to identify lymph nodes suggestive of cancer recurrence remains unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate physicians' posttreatment surveillance practices for DTC recurrence, specifically their use of and confidence in ultrasonography. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of 448 physicians in private and academic hospitals who completed a survey on DTC posttreatment practices from October 2018 to August 2019 (response rate, 69%) and self-reported involvement in long-term surveillance for thyroid cancer recurrence. Physicians were identified by patients affiliated with the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program registries in Georgia State and Los Angeles County. Of the respondents, 320 physicians who reported involvement with DTC surveillance were included in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Physician-reported long-term surveillance practices for DTC, including frequency of use and level of confidence in ultrasonography for detecting lymph nodes suggestive of cancer recurrence.
RESULTS: In the cohort of 320 physicians who reported involvement with DTC surveillance, 186 (60%) had been in practice for 10 years to less than 30 years; 209 (68%) were White; and 212 (66%) were men. The physicians included 170 (56%) endocrinologists, 67 (21%) general surgeons, and 75 (23%) otolaryngologists. Just 84 (27%) physicians reported personally performing bedside ultrasonography. Only 57 (20%) had high confidence (rated quite or extremely confident) in their ability to use bedside ultrasonography to identify lymph nodes suggestive of recurrence; 94 (33%) did not report high confidence in either their ability or a radiologist's ability to use ultrasonography to detect recurrence. Higher confidence in ultrasonography was associated with the general surgery subspecialty (odds ratio [OR], 5.7; 95% CI, 2.2-14.4; reference endocrinology) and with treating a higher number of patients per year (>50 patients: OR, 14.4; 95% CI, 4.4-47.4; 31-50 patients: OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 2.6-26.7; 11-30 patients: OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.5-12.1; reference 0-10 patients). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Given the importance of neck ultrasonography in long-term surveillance for thyroid cancer, these findings of physicians' low confidence in their own ability and that of radiologists to use ultrasonography to detect recurrence point to a major obstacle to standardizing long-term DTC surveillance practices.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33355635      PMCID: PMC7758830          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.4471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  35 in total

1.  Worry in Thyroid Cancer Survivors with a Favorable Prognosis.

Authors:  Maria Papaleontiou; David Reyes-Gastelum; Brittany L Gay; Kevin C Ward; Ann S Hamilton; Sarah T Hawley; Megan R Haymart
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 6.568

2.  National trends in thyroid surgery and the effect of volume on short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Myriam Loyo; Ralph P Tufano; Christine G Gourin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Current Experience of Ultrasound Training in Otolaryngology Residency Programs.

Authors:  Kara D Meister; Peter M Vila; Juliana Bonilla-Velez; Merry Sebelik; Lisa A Orloff
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-08-12       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  All thyroid ultrasound evaluations are not equal: sonographers specialized in thyroid cancer correctly label clinical N0 disease in well differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Sarah C Oltmann; David F Schneider; Herbert Chen; Rebecca S Sippel
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  A study of recurrence and death from papillary thyroid cancer with 27 years of median follow-up.

Authors:  Raymon H Grogan; Sharone P Kaplan; Hongyuan Cao; Roy E Weiss; Leslie J Degroot; Cassie A Simon; Omran M A Embia; Peter Angelos; Edwin L Kaplan; Rebecca B Schechter
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Tree-based model for thyroid cancer prognostication.

Authors:  Mousumi Banerjee; Daniel G Muenz; Joanne T Chang; Maria Papaleontiou; Megan R Haymart
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Thyroid cancer mortality and incidence: a global overview.

Authors:  Carlo La Vecchia; Matteo Malvezzi; Cristina Bosetti; Werner Garavello; Paola Bertuccio; Fabio Levi; Eva Negri
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Rising thyroid cancer incidence in the United States by demographic and tumor characteristics, 1980-2005.

Authors:  Lindsey Enewold; Kangmin Zhu; Elaine Ron; Aizen J Marrogi; Alexander Stojadinovic; George E Peoples; Susan S Devesa
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Role of Patient Maximizing-Minimizing Preferences in Thyroid Cancer Surveillance.

Authors:  Joshua M Evron; David Reyes-Gastelum; Mousumi Banerjee; Laura D Scherer; Lauren P Wallner; Ann S Hamilton; Kevin C Ward; Sarah T Hawley; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Megan R Haymart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 50.717

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Disparities in Thyroid Care.

Authors:  Debbie W Chen; Michael W Yeh
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.748

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.