Literature DB >> 33355536

Emotional Bias Modification for Individuals With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Protocol for a Co-Design Study.

Melvyn Zhang1, Ranganath Vallabhajosyula2, Daniel Fung3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder with a worldwide prevalence rate of 5%. Individuals with ADHD often tend to have difficulties with emotional regulation. The advances in experimental psychology have led to the discovery of emotional biases. Targeting emotional biases could potentially help improve the core symptoms of irritability and short-temperedness among these individuals. Emotional biases refer to the preferential allocation of attention toward emotional stimuli. A recent study reported the presence of emotional biases among individuals with ADHD when they compared individuals with ADHD with those without. Gamification technologies have been explored to help diminish the repetitiveness of the task and increase the intrinsic motivation to train. These inconsistent findings of the impact of gaming on the effectiveness of mobile interventions call for further work to better understand the needs of patients (users) and health care professionals.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research study is to collate health care professionals' perspectives on the limitations of the existing task, and to determine if gamification elements could be incorporated, to refine the conventional intervention.
METHODS: A qualitative research approach, that of a focus group, will be used. Health care professionals from the Department of Development Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore will be invited to participate in this qualitative research. During the focus group, participants are to comment on the limitations of the existing emotional bias intervention; recommend strategies to improve the intervention; and provide their perspectives pertaining to the use of gamification to improve the intervention.
RESULTS: We expect that the study will be completed in 12 months from the publication of this protocol.
CONCLUSIONS: To our best knowledge, this is perhaps one of the only few studies that have attempted to explore emotional biases among adolescents with ADHD. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/24078. ©Melvyn Zhang, Ranganath Vallabhajosyula, Daniel Fung. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 23.12.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADHD; child psychiatry; cognitive biases; emotional bias

Year:  2020        PMID: 33355536      PMCID: PMC7787886          DOI: 10.2196/24078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc        ISSN: 1929-0748


  15 in total

Review 1.  A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety.

Authors:  Bram Van Bockstaele; Bruno Verschuere; Helen Tibboel; Jan De Houwer; Geert Crombez; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  Stroop interference and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marieke M Lansbergen; J Leon Kenemans; Herman van Engeland
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  The Stroop revisited: a meta-analysis of interference control in AD/HD.

Authors:  Rosa van Mourik; Jaap Oosterlaan; Joseph A Sergeant
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 4.  ADHD prevalence estimates across three decades: an updated systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Guilherme V Polanczyk; Erik G Willcutt; Giovanni A Salum; Christian Kieling; Luis A Rohde
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Research Review: Cognitive bias modification of interpretations in youth and its effect on anxiety: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Georgina Krebs; Victoria Pile; Sean Grant; Michelle Degli Esposti; Paul Montgomery; Jennifer Y F Lau
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 6.  ADHD Rehabilitation through Video Gaming: A Systematic Review Using PRISMA Guidelines of the Current Findings and the Associated Risk of Bias.

Authors:  Thiago Strahler Rivero; Lina Maria Herrera Nuñez; Emmy Uehara Pires; Orlando Francisco Amodeo Bueno
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Serious Games and Gamification for Mental Health: Current Status and Promising Directions.

Authors:  Theresa M Fleming; Lynda Bavin; Karolina Stasiak; Eve Hermansson-Webb; Sally N Merry; Colleen Cheek; Mathijs Lucassen; Ho Ming Lau; Britta Pollmuller; Sarah Hetrick
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 8.  Serious Games for Mental Health: Are They Accessible, Feasible, and Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ho Ming Lau; Johannes H Smit; Theresa M Fleming; Heleen Riper
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Gamification in Stress Management Apps: A Critical App Review.

Authors:  Alexandra Hoffmann; Corinna A Christmann; Gabriele Bleser
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.143

Review 10.  Gamified Cognitive Bias Modification Interventions for Psychiatric Disorders: Review.

Authors:  Melvyn Zhang; Jiangbo Ying; Guo Song; Daniel Ss Fung; Helen Smith
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2018-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.