Literature DB >> 33355112

Influence of single nitrogen compounds on growth and fermentation performance of Starmerella bacillaris and Saccharomyces cerevisiae during alcoholic fermentation.

Vasileios Englezos1, Luca Cocolin1, Kalliopi Rantsiou1, Anne Ortiz-Julien2, Audrey Bloem3,4,5, Pauline Seguinot3,4,5, Carole Camarasa6,4,5.   

Abstract

Nitrogen is among the essential nutriments that govern interactions between yeast species in the wine environment. A thorough knowledge of how these yeasts assimilate the nitrogen compounds of grape juice is an important prerequisite for a successful co- or sequential fermentation. In the present study, we investigated the efficiency of 18 nitrogen sources for sustaining the growth and fermentation of two Starm. bacillaris strains displaying metabolic properties, compared to the reference yeast S. cerevisiae The analysis of growth and fermentation parameters provided a comprehensive picture of Starm. bacillaris preferences with respect to nitrogen sources for sustained growth and fermentation. Important differences were observed in S. cerevisiae regarding rates, final population and CO2 production. In particular, Lys and His supported substantial Starm. bacillaris growth and fermentation contrary to S. cerevisiae, while only 3 nitrogen sources, Arg, NH4+ and Ser, promoted S. cerevisiae growth more efficiently than that of Starm. bacillaris strains. Furthermore, Starm. bacillaris strains displayed a higher fermentative activity than S. cerevisiae during the first phase of culture with Gly or Thr, when the former species consumed solely fructose. Finally, no correlation has been shown between the ability of nitrogen sources to support growth and their fermentation efficiency. The specificities of Starm. bacillaris regarding nitrogen sources preferences are related to its genetic background, but further investigations are needed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms involved. These data are essential elements to be taken into account in order to make the best use of the potential of the two species.IMPORTANCE Mixed fermentations combining non-Saccharomyces and S. cerevisiae strains are increasingly implemented in the wine sector as they offer promising opportunities to diversify the flavour profile of end-products. However, competition for nutrients between species can cause fermentation problems, which is a severe hindrance to the development of these approaches. With the knowledge provided in this study on the nitrogen preferences of Starm. bacillaris, winemakers will be able to set up a nitrogen nutrition scheme adapted to the requirement of each species during mixed fermentation, through must supplementation with relevant nitrogen compounds. This will prevent nitrogen depletion or competition between yeasts for nitrogen sources, and consequently potential issues during fermentation. The data of this study highlight the importance of an appropriate nitrogen resource management during co- or sequential fermentation for fully exploiting the phenotypic potential of non-Saccharomyces yeasts.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33355112      PMCID: PMC8090893          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02485-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  41 in total

Review 1.  Wine microbiome: A dynamic world of microbial interactions.

Authors:  Youzhong Liu; Sandrine Rousseaux; Raphaëlle Tourdot-Maréchal; Mohand Sadoudi; Régis Gougeon; Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin; Hervé Alexandre
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 11.176

2.  Genome-wide analysis of lysine catabolism in bacteria reveals new connections with osmotic stress resistance.

Authors:  Izabella A P Neshich; Eduardo Kiyota; Paulo Arruda
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Growth of non-Saccharomyces yeasts affects nutrient availability for Saccharomyces cerevisiae during wine fermentation.

Authors:  Karina Medina; Eduardo Boido; Eduardo Dellacassa; Francisco Carrau
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 5.277

Review 4.  Metabolism of sulfur amino acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  D Thomas; Y Surdin-Kerjan
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Effect of 21 different nitrogen sources on global gene expression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Patrice Godard; Antonio Urrestarazu; Stéphan Vissers; Kevin Kontos; Gianluca Bontempi; Jacques van Helden; Bruno André
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Substrate specificity of thiamine pyrophosphate-dependent 2-oxo-acid decarboxylases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Gabriele Romagnoli; Marijke A H Luttik; Peter Kötter; Jack T Pronk; Jean-Marc Daran
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Histidine degradation via an aminotransferase increases the nutritional flexibility of Candida glabrata.

Authors:  Sascha Brunke; Katja Seider; Martin Ernst Richter; Sibylle Bremer-Streck; Shruthi Ramachandra; Michael Kiehntopf; Matthias Brock; Bernhard Hube
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2014-04-11

8.  Nitrogen sources preferences of non-Saccharomyces yeasts to sustain growth and fermentation under winemaking conditions.

Authors:  Ying Su; Pauline Seguinot; Isabelle Sanchez; Anne Ortiz-Julien; José Maria Heras; Amparo Querol; Carole Camarasa; José Manuel Guillamón
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.516

9.  Potential Role of Yeast Strains Isolated from Grapes in the Production of Taurasi DOCG.

Authors:  Maria Aponte; Giuseppe Blaiotta
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  The Impact of Single Amino Acids on Growth and Volatile Aroma Production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains.

Authors:  Samantha Fairbairn; Alexander McKinnon; Hannibal T Musarurwa; António C Ferreira; Florian F Bauer
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.