| Literature DB >> 33355101 |
Polina Beskrovnaya1, Doaa Fakih2, Isabelle Morneau2, Ameena Hashimi1, Dainelys Guadarrama Bello2, Shipei Xing3, Antonio Nanci2, Tao Huan3, Elitza I Tocheva4,2.
Abstract
Endospore formation is used by members of the phylum Firmicutes to withstand extreme environmental conditions. Several recent studies have proposed endospore formation in species outside of Firmicutes, particularly in Rhodobacter johrii and Serratia marcescens, members of the phylum Proteobacteria. Here, we aimed to investigate endospore formation in these two species by using advanced imaging and analytical approaches. Examination of the phase-bright structures observed in R. johrii and S. marcescens using cryo-electron tomography failed to identify endospores or stages of endospore formation. We determined that the phase-bright objects in R. johrii cells were triacylglycerol storage granules and those in S. marcescens were aggregates of cellular debris. In addition, R. johrii and S. marcescens containing phase-bright objects do not possess phenotypic and genetic features of endospores, including enhanced resistance to heat, presence of dipicolinic acid, or the presence of many of the genes associated with endospore formation. Our results support the hypothesis that endospore formation is restricted to the phylum Firmicutes.Importance: Bacterial endospore formation is an important process that allows the formation of dormant life forms called spores. As such, organisms able to sporulate can survive harsh environmental conditions for hundreds of years. Here, we follow up on previous claims that two members of Proteobacteria, Serratia marcescens and Rhodobacter johrii, are able to form spores. We conclude that those claims were incorrect and show that the putative spores in R. johrii and S. marcescens are storage granules and cellular debris, respectively. This study concludes that endospore formation is still unique to the phylum Firmicutes.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33355101 PMCID: PMC8090866 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02312-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol ISSN: 0099-2240 Impact factor: 4.792
FIG 1Phase-contrast light microscopy of R. johrii and S. marcescens cells. (A) Two-day-old R. johrii cells lack phase-bright objects. (B) Seven-day-old R. johrii cells show phase-bright objects (black arrows). (C) Seven-day-old S. marcescens cells lack phase-bright objects. (D) After 65 days, S. marcescens cells show two kinds of cell morphologies: phase-bright (black arrows) and ghost cells (white arrows). Scale bar, 10 μm.
FIG 2Correlative light and cryo-ET of R. johrii. (A) (Left) Phase-contrast microscopy image of an R. johrii cell (boxed) displaying a phase-bright object. (Right) Tomographic slice of the same cell showing two granular structures. (B) (Left) Phase-contrast microscopy image of R. johrii cells (boxed) lacking phase-bright objects. (Right) Tomographic slice of the same cell showing lack of subcellular structures. Scale bar, 200 nm.
FIG 3Correlative LM and SEM of R. johrii for storage granule characterization with EDX. (A) An LM image of R. johrii shows the presence of storage granules (phase-bright objects) inside a cell (red square). (B) The same cell as in panel A imaged with SEM. Areas corresponding to the storage granule and cytoplasm are depicted by blue and red asterisks, respectively. (C) Elemental composition of the storage granule (blue) and cytoplasm (red) using EDX semiquantitative analysis. Major peaks are assigned and data are summarized in a table format. Scale bars, 10 μm (A) and 5 μm (B). ND, nondetected.
Lipidomic analysis of whole R. johrii cells
| Lipid | Lipid class | Fold change, | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE 33:1; PE 16:0-17:1 | PE | 147.84 | 4.71E−09 |
| TAG 58:1; TAG 16:0-24:0-18:1 | TAG | 93.81 | 1.81E−08 |
| TAG 52:3; TAG 16:0-18:1-18:2 | TAG | 67.19 | 1.24E−08 |
| TAG 54:5; TAG 18:1-18:2-18:2 | TAG | 60.41 | 1.37E−06 |
| TAG 52:2; TAG 18:0-16:1-18:1 | TAG | 57.72 | 1.93E−07 |
| TAG 54:4; TAG 18:1-18:1-18:2 | TAG | 54.46 | 2.37E−08 |
| TAG 52:1; TAG 16:0-18:0-18:1 | TAG | 49.15 | 1.22E−10 |
| TAG 56:2; TAG 16:0-18:1-22:1 | TAG | 48.89 | 5.37E−09 |
| TAG 50:1; TAG 16:0-16:0-18:1 | TAG | 46.43 | 7.39E−09 |
| TAG 54:2; TAG 18:0-18:1-18:1 | TAG | 44.82 | 2.37E−09 |
| TAG 58:2; TAG 16:0-18:1-24:1 | TAG | 42.04 | 9.59E−09 |
| TAG 52:2; TAG 16:0-18:1-18:1 | TAG | 41.06 | 5.93E−09 |
| TAG 56:1; TAG 16:0-22:0-18:1 | TAG | 39.72 | 8.65E−10 |
| TAG 54:1; TAG 18:0-18:0-18:1 | TAG | 39.35 | 1.15E−08 |
| TAG 54:3; TAG 18:0-18:1-18:2 | TAG | 17.15 | 3.93E−08 |
| TAG 50:2; TAG 16:0-16:1-18:1 | TAG | 12.30 | 1.90E−08 |
| PE 32:0; PE 16:0-16:0 | PE | 11.55 | 1.73E−06 |
| PC 39:3 | PC | 10.77 | 1.06E−08 |
| PE 32:1; PE 16:0-16:1 | PE | 7.68 | 3.84E−07 |
| TAG 48:1; TAG 14:0-16:0-18:1 | TAG | 4.94 | 2.00E−05 |
| PE 35:2; PE 17:1-18:1 | PE | 3.09 | 6.92E−06 |
| PC 36:4 | PC | 3.03 | 4.93E−06 |
| TAG 48:1; TAG 16:0-16:0-16:1 | TAG | 2.52 | 4.51E−03 |
| PC 32:1 | PC | 2.18 | 4.46E−07 |
| PC 34:1; PC 16:0-18:1 | PC | 2.15 | 6.50E−08 |
| DAG 36:2; DAG 18:1-18:1 | DAG | 2.08 | 5.34E−08 |
| PC 34:2; PC 16:1-18:1 | PC | 2.02 | 1.57E−06 |
Abbreviations: PE, phosphatidyl ethanolamine; TAG, triacylglycerol; PC, phosphatidylcholine; DAG, diglyceride.
The total lipid composition of R. johrii expressing storage granules [R.j (+)] was compared to that of a fresh R. johrii culture lacking storage granules [R.j (−)].
PE is a lipid class with two acyl chains. PE 16:0-17:1 indicates that the chain lengths are 16 carbons and 17 carbons and the saturation degrees are 0 and 1, respectively. PE 33:1 is the simpler form of PE 16:0-17:1.
FIG 4Cryo-ET of S. marcescens. Tomographic slices through the following are shown: vegetative cells from a 2-day-old culture (A) and cells from a 65-day-old culture showing phase-bright objects (B). Panel B shows two cell types: cells with accumulated cellular debris (black asterisk) and ghost cells void of cellular material (white asterisks). Scale bar, 200 nm. IM, inner membrane; PG, peptidoglycan; OM, outer membrane.
Analysis for presence of endospore formation genes in R. johrii and S. marcescens