Literature DB >> 33354869

Detection of synthetic cannabinoid adulteration in the unregulated drug supply in three Canadian settings.

Lianping Ti1,2, Samuel Tobias1, Nazlee Maghsoudi3,4, M-J Milloy1,2, Karen McDonald3, Aaron Shapiro5,6, Daniel Beriault7, Cristiana Stefan8, Mark Lysyshyn9,10, Daniel Werb3,11.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Novel psychoactive substances (NPS) are increasingly being consumed worldwide, with synthetic cannabinoids and synthetic opioids being the second and third most commonly used NPS, respectively. Certain synthetic cannabinoids can produce significant harms, particularly when used with opioids. The objective of this study was to characterise the presence of synthetic cannabinoids in the unregulated drug supply in three Canadian settings
METHODS: In the British Columbia setting, all samples were first analysed at point-of-care using combination Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and fentanyl immunoassay strips prior to confirmatory testing using quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and/or liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). In the Toronto, Ontario setting, the samples were analysed directly by GC/MS, LC/MS liquid chromatography-high resolution/mass spectrometry.
RESULTS: Between January 2018 and December 2019, 38 (2.8%) synthetic cannabinoid samples were detected in the unregulated drug supply (25/909 in British Columbia and 13/440 in Ontario). In British Columbia and Ontario, 76% and 85% of samples, respectively, were expected by individuals to be an opioid. Synthetic cannabinoids detected included AMB-FUBINACA, AB-FUBINACA, 5-fluoro-MDMB-PINACA, and 5-fluoro-MDMB-PICA, and largely co-occurred with fentanyl. In the British Columbia context, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy failed to detect synthetic cannabinoid compounds in almost half (48%) of the samples at point-of-care. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: As point-of-care technologies failed to detect these compounds in many occasions, our findings demonstrate the importance of laboratory confirmatory analysis to identify NPS. Given the high risk of harm associated with the consumption of synthetic cannabinoids, further research should investigate the reasons for adulteration.
© 2020 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canada; drug checking; opioid; synthetic cannabinoid

Year:  2020        PMID: 33354869     DOI: 10.1111/dar.13237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev        ISSN: 0959-5236


  6 in total

1.  Implementation of Safe Supply Alternatives During Intersecting COVID-19 and Overdose Health Emergencies in British Columbia, Canada, 2021.

Authors:  Ryan McNeil; Taylor Fleming; Samara Mayer; Allison Barker; Manal Mansoor; Alex Betsos; Tamar Austin; Sylvia Parusel; Andrew Ivsins; Jade Boyd
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Implementation and Uptake of the Massachusetts Drug Supply Data Stream: A Statewide Public Health-Public Safety Partnership Drug Checking Program.

Authors:  Traci C Green; Rebecca Olson; Cole Jarczyk; Earth Erowid; Fire Erowid; Sylvia Thyssen; Rachel Wightman; Brandon Del Pozo; Laura Michelson; Amanda Consigli; Brittni Reilly; Sarah Ruiz
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2022 Nov-Dec 01

Review 3.  Detection of the Synthetic Cannabinoids AB-CHMINACA, ADB-CHMINACA, MDMB-CHMICA, and 5F-MDMB-PINACA in Biological Matrices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elisabet Navarro-Tapia; Jana Codina; Víctor José Villanueva-Blasco; Óscar García-Algar; Vicente Andreu-Fernández
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23

Review 4.  A Realist Review of How Community-Based Drug Checking Services Could Be Designed and Implemented to Promote Engagement of People Who Use Drugs.

Authors:  Wendy Masterton; Danilo Falzon; Gillian Burton; Hannah Carver; Bruce Wallace; Elizabeth V Aston; Harry Sumnall; Fiona Measham; Rosalind Gittins; Vicki Craik; Joe Schofield; Simon Little; Tessa Parkes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Drug checking services for people who use drugs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nazlee Maghsoudi; Justine Tanguay; Kristy Scarfone; Indhu Rammohan; Carolyn Ziegler; Dan Werb; Ayden I Scheim
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 7.256

6.  Invited Commentary: Drug Checking for Novel Insights Into the Unregulated Drug Supply.

Authors:  Nabarun Dasgupta; Mary C Figgatt
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.897

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.