Literature DB >> 33354730

In-Hospital Intravenous Thrombolysis Offers No Benefit in Mechanical Thrombectomy in Optimized Tertiary Stroke Center Setting.

Juha-Pekka Pienimäki1,2, Jyrki Ollikainen3, Niko Sillanpää1,2, Sara Protto4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the first-line treatment in acute stroke patients presenting with large vessel occlusion (LVO). The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to MT is being contested. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of MT without IVT in patients with no contraindications to IVT presenting directly to a tertiary stroke center with acute anterior circulation LVO.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected the data of 106 acute stroke patients who underwent MT in a single high-volume stroke center. Patients with anterior circulation LVO eligible for IVT and directly admitted to our institution who subsequently underwent MT were included. We recorded baseline clinical, laboratory, procedural, and imaging variables and technical, imaging, and clinical outcomes. The effect of intravenous thrombolysis on 3-month clinical outcome (mRS) was analyzed with univariate tests and binary and ordinal logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight out of the 106 patients received IVT + MT. These patients had 2.6-fold higher odds of poorer clinical outcome in mRS shift analysis (p = 0.01) compared to MT-only patients who had excellent 3-month clinical outcome (mRS 0-1) three times more often (p = 0.009). There were no significant differences between the groups in process times, mTICI, or number of hemorrhagic complications. A trend of less distal embolization and higher number of device passes was observed among the MT-only patients.
CONCLUSIONS: MT without prior IVT was associated with an improved overall three-month clinical outcome in acute anterior circulation LVO patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intravenous thrombolysis; Ischemic stroke; Mechanical thrombectomy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33354730      PMCID: PMC7987593          DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02727-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  28 in total

Review 1.  Acute stroke intervention: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shyam Prabhakaran; Ilana Ruff; Richard A Bernstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Direct Mechanical Intervention Versus Combined Intravenous and Mechanical Intervention in Large Artery Anterior Circulation Stroke: A Matched-Pairs Analysis.

Authors:  Anne Broeg-Morvay; Pasquale Mordasini; Corrado Bernasconi; Monika Bühlmann; Frauke Pult; Marcel Arnold; Gerhard Schroth; Simon Jung; Heinrich P Mattle; Jan Gralla; Urs Fischer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Combined intravenous and endovascular treatment versus primary mechanical thrombectomy. The Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke.

Authors:  Ilaria Casetta; Giovanni Pracucci; Andrea Saletti; Valentina Saia; Marina Padroni; Alessandro De Vito; Domenico Inzitari; Andrea Zini; Stefano Vallone; Mauro Bergui; Paolo Cerrato; Sandra Bracco; Rossana Tassi; Roberto Gandini; Fabrizio Sallustio; Mariangela Piano; Cristina Motto; Paolino La Spina; Sergio L Vinci; Francesco Causin; Claudio Baracchini; Roberto Gasparotti; Mauro Magoni; Lucio Castellan; Carlo Serrati; Salvatore Mangiafico; Danilo Toni
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.266

4.  Comparison of Outcomes After Mechanical Thrombectomy Alone or Combined with Intravenous Thrombolysis and Mechanical Thrombectomy for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Large Vessel Occlusion.

Authors:  Jai Ho Choi; Sang Hyuk Im; Ki Jeong Lee; Ja Seong Koo; Bum Soo Kim; Yong Sam Shin
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 5.  Endovascular Thrombectomy Alone versus Combined with Intravenous Thrombolysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Adam A Dmytriw; Julian Maingard; Hamed Asadi; Christoph J Griessenauer; Wyatt Ng; Kitso Kewagamang; Ralph J Mobbs; Justin M Moore; Christopher S Ogilvy; Ajith J Thomas
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 6.  The impact of cerebral microbleeds on intracerebral hemorrhage and poor functional outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shuang Wang; Yan Lv; Xin Zheng; Jing Qiu; Hui-Sheng Chen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcomes With and Without Intravenous Thrombolysis in Stroke Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Eva A Mistry; Akshitkumar M Mistry; Mohammad Obadah Nakawah; Rohan V Chitale; Robert F James; John J Volpi; Matthew R Fusco
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 8.  Microbleeds, Cerebral Hemorrhage, and Functional Outcome After Stroke Thrombolysis.

Authors:  Andreas Charidimou; Guillaume Turc; Catherine Oppenheim; Shenqiang Yan; Jan F Scheitz; Hebun Erdur; Pascal P Klinger-Gratz; Marwan El-Koussy; Wakoh Takahashi; Yusuke Moriya; Duncan Wilson; Chelsea S Kidwell; Jeffrey L Saver; Asma Sallem; Solene Moulin; Myriam Edjlali-Goujon; Vincent Thijs; Zoe Fox; Ashkan Shoamanesh; Gregory W Albers; Heinrich P Mattle; Oscar R Benavente; H Rolf Jäger; Gareth Ambler; Junya Aoki; Jean-Claude Baron; Kazumi Kimura; Wataru Kakuda; Shunya Takizawa; Simon Jung; Christian H Nolte; Min Lou; Charlotte Cordonnier; David J Werring
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcomes With or Without Intravenous Thrombolysis.

Authors:  Florent Gariel; Bertrand Lapergue; Romain Bourcier; Jérôme Berge; Xavier Barreau; Mikael Mazighi; Maéva Kyheng; Julien Labreuche; Robert Fahed; Raphael Blanc; Benjamin Gory; Alain Duhamel; Suzana Saleme; Vincent Costalat; Serge Bracard; Hubert Desal; Lili Detraz; Arturo Consoli; Michel Piotin; Gaultier Marnat
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Direct Mechanical Intervention Versus Bridging Therapy in Stroke Patients Eligible for Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Pooled Analysis of 2 Registries.

Authors:  Sebastian Bellwald; Ralph Weber; Tomas Dobrocky; Hannes Nordmeyer; Simon Jung; Jeffrie Hadisurya; Pasquale Mordasini; Marie-Luise Mono; Christian P Stracke; Hakan Sarikaya; Corrado Bernasconi; Klaus Berger; Marcel Arnold; René Chapot; Jan Gralla; Urs Fischer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment with or without intravenous alteplase in acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Cong Yuan; Xinyu Deng; Qiang Yuan; Meihua Wang; Pengfei Fu; Jiang Fang; Zhuoying Du; Jin Hu
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 2.  Intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion; should we cross that bridge? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 36,123 patients.

Authors:  Hazem S Ghaith; Mohamed Elfil; Mohamed Diaa Gabra; Asmaa Ahmed Nawar; Mohamed Sameh Abd-Alkhaleq; Khaled M Hamam; Lara Ebrahim Aboelnasr; Esraa Ayman Elgezery; Mohamed Hosny Osman; Hanaa Elsayed; Sarya Swed; Ulrick Sidney Kanmounye; Ahmed Negida
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.830

3.  Intravenous Thrombolysis Before Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Houwei Du; Hanhan Lei; Gareth Ambler; Shuangfang Fang; Raoli He; Qilin Yuan; David J Werring; Nan Liu
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.106

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.