| Literature DB >> 33354510 |
Yixian Zhou1, Boyi Niu1, Biyuan Wu1, Sulan Luo1, Jintao Fu1, Yiting Zhao1, Guilan Quan2, Xin Pan1, Chuanbin Wu1.
Abstract
Pulmonary drug delivery has attracted increasing attention in biomedicine, and porous particles can effectively enhance the aerosolization performance and bioavailability of drugs. However, the existing methods for preparing porous particles using porogens have several drawbacks, such as the inhomogeneous and uncontrollable pores, drug leakage, and high risk of fragmentation. In this study, a series of cyclodextrin-based metal-organic framework (CD-MOF) particles containing homogenous nanopores were delicately engineered without porogens. Compared with commercial inhalation carrier, CD-MOF showed excellent aerosolization performance because of the homogenous nanoporous structure. The great biocompatibility of CD-MOF in pulmonary delivery was also confirmed by a series of experiments, including cytotoxicity assay, hemolysis ratio test, lung function evaluation, in vivo lung injury markers measurement, and histological analysis. The results of ex vivo fluorescence imaging showed the high deposition rate of CD-MOF in lungs. Therefore, all results demonstrated that CD-MOF was a promising carrier for pulmonary drug delivery. This study may throw light on the nanoporous particles for effective pulmonary administration.Entities:
Keywords: ANOVA, analysis of variance; BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; BET, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller; CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; CD-MOF, cyclodextrin-based metal-organic framework; CD-MOF-K, ketoprofen-loaded cyclodextrin-based metal-organic framework; CD-MOF-R, rhodamine B-loaded cyclodextrin-based metal-organic framework; CF, commercial formulation; CTAB, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide; Cdyn, dynamic lung compliance; DPPC, 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; FBS, fetal bovine serum; FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration; FPF, fine particle fraction; GSD, geometric standard deviation; HE, Hematoxylin-Eosin; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; Inhalable dry powder; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; MMAD, mean mass aerodynamic diameter; MOF, metal-organic framework; Metal-organic framework; NGI, next generation pharmaceutical impactor; Nanoporous particle; PBS, phosphate buffered solution; PVP, poly(vinyl pyrrolidone); PXRD, powder X-ray diffraction; Pulmonary drug delivery; Rl, lung resistance; SD rat, Sprague–Dawley rat; SEM, scanning electron microscopy; SLF, simulated lung fluid; γ-CD, γ-cyclodextrin
Year: 2020 PMID: 33354510 PMCID: PMC7745127 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.07.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Pharm Sin B ISSN: 2211-3835 Impact factor: 11.413
Synthesis conditions of CD-MOF-K-A, CD-MOF-K-B and CD-MOF-K-C.
| Sample | Water bath temperature (°C) | Water bath time (h) | Standing time (h) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD-MOF-K-A | 10:6:15 | 50.0 | 0.5 | 4.0 |
| CD-MOF-K-B | 10:6:6 | 50.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| CD-MOF-K-C | 10:6:0 | 50.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
Vw is the volume of water, Vkm is the volume of ketoprofen methanol solution, and Vm is the volume of methanol.
Figure 1SEM images of (A) CD-MOF-K-A, (B) CD-MOF-K-B, (C) CD-MOF-K-C, and (D) CF. (E) The median diameters of CD-MOF-K-A, CD-MOF-K-B, CD-MOF-K-C, and micronized ketoprofen (data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3). (F) PXRD patterns of simulated CD-MOF, CD-MOF-K-A, CD-MOF-K-B, CD-MOF-K-C, and ketoprofen. (G) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and (H) pore size distributions of CD-MOF-K-A, CD-MOF-K-B, CD-MOF-K-C, and micronized ketoprofen. (I) The schematic illustration of the structure of CD-MOF. (J) The drug release profiles for CD-MOF-K-A and ketoprofen at 37 °C. The release medium was simulated lung fluid (data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3).
Figure 2(A) In vitro pulmonary deposition patterns of CD-MOF-K-A, CD-MOF-K-B, CD-MOF-K-C, and CF. Inset shows the FPF values of different samples (data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3). (B) Mass median aerodynamic diameters of CD-MOF-K-A, CD-MOF-K-B, CD-MOF-K-C, and CF (data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3). (C) Emitted dose of CD-MOF-K-A, CD-MOF-K-B, CD-MOF-K-C, and CF (data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 10). (D) The experimental and simulated deposition rates of CD-MOF-K-A and CF in different stages of NGI. The simulation was performed using finite element method. (E) The velocity field of the NGI model by finite element method. (F) The trajectories of CD-MOF-K-A and CF particles in NGI model. Significant difference is regarded as P < 0.05, ∗P ≤ 0.05, ∗∗P ≤ 0.01, ∗∗∗P ≤ 0.001.
Figure 3Cell viabilities of (A) A549 cells and (B) Calu-3 cells after incubated with various concentrations of ketoprofen, CD-MOF, CD-MOF-K for 24 h (data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 6). (C) Hemolysis ratios of CF, CD-MOF, CD-MOF-K at various concentrations (data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3). (D) Illustration of intratracheally administration of samples to rats and the evaluation of lung function of rats. The (E) Rl and (F) Cdyn values of rats after pulmonary delivery of different samples for 1 and 8 h (data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 6).
Figure 4(A) Concentrations of various inflammatory cytokines in BALF of rats after pulmonary delivery of different samples for 24 and 48 h (data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 6). Significant difference is regarded as P < 0.05, ∗P ≤ 0.05, ∗P ≤ 0.01, ∗∗∗P ≤ 0.001. No significant difference was found among blank, CF, CD-MOF and CD-MOF-K groups. (B) Heatmaps of various inflammatory cytokines in BALF of different groups.
Figure 5(A) Histological images of lungs excised after pulmonary delivery of different samples into rats at different time points (scale bar: 100 μm for all panels). (B) Histological images of organs (heart, liver, spleen, and kidney) excised after pulmonary delivery of different samples into rats at different time points (scale bar: 100 μm for all panels).
Figure 6(A) The fluorescence images of lungs at different time points after pulmonary delivery of different samples into rats. (B) The fluorescence images of the major organs (liver, kidney, heart, and spleen) at different time points after pulmonary delivery of CD-MOF-R-A into rats. (C) MFI values of lungs at different time points after pulmonary delivery of different samples into rats (data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3). Significant difference is regarded as P < 0.05, ∗P ≤ 0.05, ∗∗P ≤ 0.01, ∗∗∗P ≤ 0.001. (D) MFI values of the major organs (liver, kidney, heart, and spleen) at different time points after pulmonary delivery of CD-MOF-R-A into rats (data are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3).