Literature DB >> 33354387

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN AND PHYSICAL FACTORS IN COLLEGIATE POLE VAULTERS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.

Shota Enoki1, Rieko Kuramochi, Yuki Murata2, Gaku Tokutake1, Takuya Shimizu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The low back is the most common injury location in pole vaulters, and low back pain (LBP) can easily become chronic. Therefore, knowing the physical characteristics of athletes experiencing repeated LBP may be beneficial for recovery and injury prevention.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze the physical characteristics of pole vaulters with chronic LBP. STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Twenty male pole vaulters participated in this study. A questionnaire was used to garner descriptive and personal data, including personal best performance in the pole vault. Additionally, the following physical characteristics were measured: 1) isokinetic muscle strength of hip and knee flexors and extensors, 2) active/passive range of motion and muscle flexibility in multiple joints and regions, 3) performance on the Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS™) and 4) spinal column alignment. Subjects were categorized using the questionnaire and divided into two groups, one with and one without chronic LBP.
RESULTS: The personal best performance and angle on the active straight leg raise test (SLR) were significantly lower and smaller, respectively, in the chronic LBP group than in the non-chronic LBP group. Additionally, the difference between the passive SLR angle and active SLR angle (ΔSLR) was significantly larger in the chronic LBP group than in the non-chronic LBP group. Those with chronic LBP had were more likely to have a FMS™ composite score ≤14.
CONCLUSION: The active SLR angle and ΔSLR were significantly smaller and larger, respectively, in the chronic LBP group than in the non-chronic LBP group. This may be because of the poor stability of trunk or incompetence of the kinetic chain required for raising the lower limbs. The chronic LBP group had a significantly higher probability of having an FMS™ composite score of ≤14. it may be important to examine the active straight leg raise (vs. passive only), and fundamental movements as screened by the FMS ™ in pole vaulters. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.
© 2020 by the Sports Physical Therapy Section.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic low back pain; functional movement screen; physical factors; pole vault

Year:  2020        PMID: 33354387      PMCID: PMC7735698     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  22 in total

1.  Spinal mobility: sagittal range of motion measured with the SpinalMouse, a new non-invasive device.

Authors:  R B Post; V J M Leferink
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-02-14       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Reliability, Validity, and Injury Predictive Value of the Functional Movement Screen: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bonazza; Dallas Smuin; Cayce A Onks; Matthew L Silvis; Aman Dhawan
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Corrective Exercises Improve Movement Efficiency and Sensorimotor Function but Not Fatigue Sensitivity in Chronic Ankle Instability Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sajad Bagherian; Nader Rahnama; Erik A Wikstrom
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.638

4.  Biomechanics of the spine in the polevaulter as related to spondylolysis.

Authors:  B J Gainor; R J Hagen; W C Allen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Impact of spinal imbalance and BMI on lumbar spinal canal stenosis determined by a diagnostic support tool: cohort study in community‑living people.

Authors:  Kenichi Hirano; Shiro Imagama; Yukiharu Hasegawa; Akio Muramoto; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  A prospective study of injury patterns in collegiate pole vaulters.

Authors:  Gregory Rebella
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  After an episode of acute low back pain, recurrence is unpredictable and not as common as previously thought.

Authors:  Tasha R Stanton; Nicholas Henschke; Chris G Maher; Kathryn M Refshauge; Jane Latimer; James H McAuley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Functional movement scores and longitudinal performance outcomes in elite track and field athletes.

Authors:  Robert F Chapman; Abigail S Laymon; Todd Arnold
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.010

9.  Catastrophic injuries in pole vaulters: a prospective 9-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Barry P Boden; Matthew G Boden; Rebecca G Peter; Fred O Mueller; Jan E Johnson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 10.  Do Functional Movement Screen (FMS) composite scores predict subsequent injury? A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert W Moran; Anthony G Schneiders; Jesse Mason; S John Sullivan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  1 in total

1.  Internal Risk Factors for Low Back Pain in Pole Vaulters and Decathletes: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Shota Enoki; Rieko Kuramochi; Yuki Murata; Gaku Tokutake; Tatsuo Sakamoto; Takuya Shimizu
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.