| Literature DB >> 33354210 |
Vanessa Mba Matah Marte1, Gilbert Ateufack1, Marius Mbiantcha1, Albert Donatien Atsamo2, Carine Flore Adjouzem1, Stéphanie Flore Djuichou Nguemnang1, Eric Gonzal Tsafack1, William Yousseu Nana1, Yacine Karelle Madjo Kouam1, Elvira Ngoufack Azanze1.
Abstract
Distemonanthus benthamianus (Caesalpiniaceae) is a plant from the Cameroon pharmacopoeia very widely used in the treatment of many pathologies among which are gastrointestinal disorders. The main purpose of this study was to assess the healing properties of gastric ulcer from the methanolic extract of Distemonanthus benthamianus and its mechanisms of action. The healing properties of gastric ulcers (chronic ulcer model induced by ethanol and indomethacin) were evaluated in vivo in adult male rats, while the mechanisms of action were evaluated in vitro by anti-inflammatory assay (protein denaturation, cyclooxygenase, and lipoxygenase assays) and immunomodulatory assay (ROS production (using technical chemiluminescence), cytokine (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6) production (using ELISA), proliferation of T cells (using liquid scintillation counter), and cytotoxicity (using MTT assay)). The methanolic extract of Distemonanthus benthamianus inhibited protein denaturation (75.63%) and the activities of cyclooxygenase (78.92%) and 5-lipoxygenase (81.54%). The extract also significantly (p < 0.001) inhibited intracellular and extracellular ROS production and T cell proliferation and reduced significantly (p < 0.01, p < 0.001) TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and PGE2 production. At all doses (125, 250, and 500 mg/kg), the extract significantly reduces the ulceration index and the area of ulceration and significantly increases the mass of gastric mucus. In addition, the extract significantly decreases the level of MDA, significantly increases the activities of catalase and glutathione, and then improves the hematological parameters in sick animals. Histological micrographs show that in the presence of the extract, there is advanced reepithelialization with recovery of the ulcerated epithelium. Thus, the extract of Distemonanthus benthamianus has healing properties against gastric ulcers which are associated with its anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and antioxidant effects.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33354210 PMCID: PMC7737456 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8180323
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract ISSN: 1687-6121 Impact factor: 2.260
Effect of methanolic extract of D. benthamianus stem bark on protein denaturation, cyclooxygenase, and 5-lipoxygenase inhibition.
| Treatment | Dose ( | Activity | Inhibition (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein denaturation | COX | 5-LOX | Protein denaturation | COX | 5-LOX | ||
| Control | — | 0.518 ± 0.004 | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| |||||||
| Diclofenac | 100 | 0.133 ± 0.002c | — | — | 74.41 | — | — |
| 200 | 0.121 ± 0.002c | — | — | 76.72 | — | — | |
| 500 | 0.133 ± 0.002c | — | — | 81.48 | — | — | |
| 1000 | 0.056 ± 0.001c | — | — | 89.19 | — | — | |
|
| |||||||
| Ibuprofen | 100 | — | 0.11 ± 0.006 | 0.232 ± 0.022 | — | 83.51 | 83.16 |
| 200 | — | 0.018 ± 0.001c | 0.038 ± 0.001c | — | 88.79 | 87.41 | |
| 500 | — | 0.011 ± 0.44c | 0.029 ± 0.005c | — | 93.06 | 91.36 | |
| 1000 | — | 0.007 ± 0.001c | 0.021 ± 0.006c | — | 97.51 | 95.65 | |
|
| |||||||
| Methanolic extract | 100 | 0.215 ± 0.003c | 0.003 ± 0.002 | 0.010 ± 0.001c | 58.52 | 40.98 | 43.86 |
| 200 | 0.205 ± 0.002c | 0.045 ± 0.001c | 0.080 ± 0.005c | 60.39 | 56.15 | 59.42 | |
| 500 | 0.186 ± 0.002c | 0.036 ± 0.003c | 0.060 ± 0.004c | 64.18 | 64.31 | 67.47 | |
| 1000 | 0.126 ± 0.006c | 0.021 ± 0.001c | 0.040 ± 0.003c | 75.63 | 78.92 | 81.54 | |
Each value represents the mean ± SEM; cp < 0.001: significant difference compared to the control group. The percentage values were obtained using various concentrations of test compounds, and readings are presented as mean of triplicates. COX: cyclooxygenase; LOX: 5-lipoxygenase.
IC50 value of methanolic extract of D. benthamianus stem bark on ROS production evaluated by zymosan/PMA-amplified chemiluminescence, on T-cell proliferation and Cytotoxicity.
| Treatment | Intracellular and extracellular ROS | T cell proliferation (IC50 ( | Cytotoxicity (CI50 ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luminol/zymosan (IC50 ( | PAM/lucigenin (IC50 ( | |||||||
| WB | PMNs | MQ | WB | PMNs | MQ | |||
| Methanolic extract | 9.47 ± 0.12 | 5.59 ± 0, 03 | 6.05 ± 0.025 | 8.91 ± 0.092 | 4.40 ± 010 | 5.29 ± 0.37 | 3.01 ± 0.42 | 32.01 ± 0.87 |
| Ibuprofen | 15.81 ± 0.22 | 15.20 ± 0.64 | 15.69 ± 1.45 | 17.83 ± 0.16 | 15.55 ± 0.54 | 16.57 ± 0.54 | — | — |
| Prednisolone | — | — | — | — | — | — | <3.10 | — |
| Cycloheximide | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.10 ± 0.13 |
The IC50 (median inhibitory concentration) values were obtained using various concentrations of test compounds, and readings are presented as mean ± standard deviation of triplicates. ROS: reactive oxygen species; WB: whole blood; PMNs: polymorphonuclear leukocytes; MQ: mice peritoneal macrophages.
Figure 1Effect of methanolic extract of D. benthamianus on proinflammatory cytokine production stimulated by LPS (lipopolysaccharides). Each value represents the mean ± SEM; ap < 0.05, bp < 0.01, and cp < 0.001: significant difference compared to the normal group. The percentage values were obtained using various concentrations of test compounds, and readings are presented as mean of triplicates. IL: interleukin; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; PGE2: prostaglandin E2.
Effect of methanolic extract of D. benthamianus stem bark on ethanol-induced gastric lesions in rats.
| Treatment | Dose (mg/kg) | UI | %US | % healing | Mucus weight (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutral | / | 0.00 | 0.00 | / | 70.50 ± 4.24 |
| Control 1 | / | 2.74 ± 0.02 | 12.33 | / | 48.50 ± 1.86 |
| Control 2 | / | 3.00 ± 0.03 | 18.37 | / | 32.00 ± 2.29 |
| Sucralfate | 100 | 2.50 ± 0.01 | 8.04 | 36.22 | 80.00 ± 1.69cɣ |
| Methanolic extract | 125 | 1.00 ± 0.00cɣ | 0.02 | 99.90 | 83.17 ± 1.28cɣ |
| 250 | 0.17 ± 0.16cɣ | 0.01 | 99.97 | 135.50 ± 4.26cɣ | |
| 500 | 0.00 ± 0.00cɣ | 0.00 | 100 | 173.17 ± 3.56cɣ |
Each value represents the mean ± standard error of the mean of 6 animals and analyses by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test; cp < 0.001: significant when compared to negative control 1 (ulcerated rats killed 5-day postethanol administration); ɣp < 0.001: significant when compared to negative control 2 (received indomethacin for 4 days + 3% DMSO for 10 days). UI: ulcer index; US: ulcerated surface.
Figure 2Macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa of the rats: (a) normal group: no lesions are observed; (b) ulcerated rats killed 5 days postethanol administration: severe lesions are seen in the gastric mucosa; (c) ulcerated rats (given indomethacin for 4 days + DMSO3% for 10 days): lesions are seen in the gastric mucosa with inflammation; (d) sucralfate (100 mg/kg): lesions in the gastric mucosa are less than those observed in negative control groups; (e) (125 mg/kg): less lesions; (f) (250 mg/kg); (g) (500 mg/kg): no lesions are observed; u: ulcer.
Influence of the methanolic extract of D. benthamianus stem bark on some hematological parameters in ethanol-induced gastric lesions in rats.
| Treatment | Dose (mg/kg) | TWBC (109/l) | Lymphocyte (109/l) | Monocytes (109/l) | Neutrophil (109/l) | Eosinophil (109/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutral | / | 18.00 ± 0.87 | 11.14 ± 0.60 | 1.12 ± 0.09 | 4.44 ± 0.27 | 1.30 ± 0.08 |
| Control 1 | / | 23.15 ± 1.17 | 8.37 ± 0.31 | 2.22 ± 0.27 | 9.67 ± 0.41 | 3.02 ± 0.17 |
| Control 2 | / | 20.17 ± 0.97 | 8.23 ± 0.28 | 2.13 ± 0.28 | 8.13 ± 0.55 | 3.83 ± 0.24 |
| Sucralfate | 100 | 16.50 ± 0.36c | 7.93 ± 0.21 | 1.17 ± 0.11b | 6.80 ± 0.38c | 1.57 ± 0.08 |
| Methanolic extract | 125 | 19.40 ± 0.96a | 10.60 ± 0.06b | 1.07 ± 0.06b | 4.03 ± 0.18cɣ | 2.97 ± 0.13 |
| 250 | 17.92 ± 0.62b | 8.87 ± 0.39 | 1.68 ± 0.21 | 5.73 ± 0.29cɣ | 2.78 ± 1.22 | |
| 500 | 18.78 ± 0.47a | 12.16 ± 0.50cɣ | 1.46 ± 0.06 | 4.78 ± 0.09cɣ | 1.44 ± 0.13 |
Each value represents the mean ± standard error of the mean of 6 animals and analyses by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test; ap < 0.05; cp < 0.001: significant when compared to negative control 1 (ulcerated rats killed 5-day postethanol administration); < 0.05, ɣp < 0.001: significant when compared to negative control 2 (received indomethacin for 4 days + 3% DMSO for 10 days); TWBC: total white blood cells.
Effect of methanolic extract of D. benthamianus stem bark on some parameters of oxidative stress in ethanol-induced gastric lesions in rats.
| Treatment | Dose (mg∕kg) | MDA ( | CAT (U/g of organ) | GSH (U/g of organ) | SOD (U/g of organ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutral | / | 2.07 ± 0.19 | 80.17 ± 0.02 | 7.14 ± 0.44 | 0.32 ± 0.02 |
| Control 1 | / | 5.16 ± 0.02 | 34.21 ± 0.73 | 4.22 ± 0.08 | 0.27 ± 0.01 |
| Control 2 | / | 5.10 ± 0.32 | 38.48 ± 0.33 | 4.96 ± 0.27 | 0.28 ± 0.01 |
| Sucralfate | 100 | 1.10 ± 0.00cɣ | 53.49 ± 4.00 | 3.39 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.01 |
| Methanolic extract | 125 | 1.29 ± 0.12cɣ | 66.31 ± 7.15cɣ | 6.07 ± 0.37cɣ | 0.22 ± 0.02 |
| 250 | 1.38 ± 0.08cɣ | 54.10 ± 2.13cɣ | 7.09 ± 0.42cɣ | 0.25 ± 0.01 | |
| 500 | 1.32 ± 0.03cɣ | 47.87 ± 1.22cɣ | 6.37 ± 0.32cɣ | 0.24 ± 0.01 |
Each value represents the mean ± standard error of the mean of 6 animals and analyses by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test; cp < 0.001: significant when compared to negative control 1 (ulcerated rats killed 5-day postethanol administration); ɣp < 0.001: significant when compared to negative control 2 (received indomethacin for 4 days + 3% DMSO for 10 days); MDA: malondialdehyde, CAT: catalase; GSH: glutathione; SOD: superoxide dismutase.
Figure 3Histological study of ethanol-induced gastric damage in rats (H&E: ×400): (a) normal control rat: no injuries in the gastric mucosa are seen; (b) control 1 and (c) control 2: there is destruction of epithelium surface and edema; (d) sucralfate 100 mg/kg: the gastric wall appears with small destruction of epithelium and edema; (e) extract 500 mg/kg): there is complete cicatrization of ulcerated portion.