| Literature DB >> 33354209 |
Lu Qi1, Shuang Li2, Jun Xu1, Jie Xu1, Wangzouyang Lou1, Liangbin Cheng3, Chizhi Zhang3.
Abstract
Acupuncture is widely used in the clinical treatment of liver cirrhosis (LC) in China. However, the efficacy of acupuncture on LC has not been fully confirmed by systematic analysis. This current meta-analysis evaluated the impact effect of acupuncture on patients with LC. We conducted a systematic literature search of the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Biomedical Database (SinoMed), VIP medicine information system, Wanfang Data, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. Further, we used Review Manager 5.3 software for the analysis of the data and Stata 14.0 software for the Egger test to assess publication bias. Fifteen studies involving 1066 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the efficacy rate of acupuncture therapy. The secondary outcomes were impact on acupuncture on liver function grading assessment and lab tests related to liver functions. The result suggested that acupuncture is an effective treatment option for patients with LC as a complementary therapy. However, the recommendation is weak due to some limitations of the included studies.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33354209 PMCID: PMC7737460 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4054781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract ISSN: 1687-6121 Impact factor: 2.260
PICOS criteria for study selection.
| Parameter | Criteria for studies |
|---|---|
| P (population) | Patients with liver cirrhosis |
| I (intervention) | Acupuncture |
| C (comparison) | No acupuncture |
| O (outcomes) | Efficacy rate of acupuncture therapy; impact of acupuncture on liver function grading assessment; outcomes related to liver function |
| S (study design) | Randomized clinical trials |
Figure 1Flowchart of study selection.
Characteristics of included studies.
| Included study (year) | Study country | Number of subjects ( | Intervening measure ( | Duration (day) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chen, 2017 | China | 47/40 | Plus acupuncture on the basis of the control group | 30 |
| Deng, 2019a | China | 25/25 | Plus acupuncture on the basis of the control group | 30 |
| Deng, 2019b | China | 30/30 | Plus acupuncture on the basis of the control group | 14 |
| Du, 2015 | China | 45/45 | Plus acupuncture on the basis of the control group | 14 |
| Fang, 2019 | China | 40/40 | Plus acupuncture on the basis of the control group | 30 |
| Li, 2016 | China | 35/35 | Plus acupuncture on the basis of the control group | 10 |
| Liu, 2018 | China | 40/40 | Plus acupuncture on the basis of the control group | 30 |
| Qu, 2014 | China | 26/25 | Plus acupuncture on the basis of the control group | 14 |
| Shen, 2013 | China | 30/30 | Plus acupuncture on the basis of the control group | 14 |
| Xia, 2019 | China | 48/47 | Plus acupuncture on the basis of the control group | 28 |
| Xiao, 2010 | China | 50/35 | Plus acupuncture on the basis of the control group | 14 |
| Xie, 2018 | China | 38/38 | Plus acupuncture on the basis of the control group | 5 |
| Yu, 2013a | China | 40/40 | Plus acupuncture on the basis of the control group | 8 |
| Yu, 2013b | China | 21/21 | Plus acupuncture on the basis of the control group | 14 |
| Zhang, 2014 | China | 30/30 | Plus acupuncture on the basis of the control group | 30 |
Note: E/C = experimental/control group.
Figure 2Risk of bias graph: review of authors' judgments regarding each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figure 3The efficacy rate of acupuncture versus no acupuncture. Both I2 and P are used as the criteria for heterogeneity test. ♦: pooled relative risk; —■—: relative risk and 95% CI.
Figure 4Impact of acupuncture on ALT. Both I2 and P represent the criteria for the heterogeneity test. ♦: pooled mean difference; —■—: mean difference and 95% CI.
Figure 5Impact of acupuncture on AST. Both I2 and P represent the criteria for the heterogeneity test. ♦: pooled mean difference; —■—: mean difference and 95% CI.
Figure 6Impact of acupuncture on ALB. Both I2 and P represent the criteria for the heterogeneity test. ♦: pooled mean difference; —■—: mean difference and 95% CI.
Figure 7Impact of acupuncture on TBIL. Both I2 and P represent the criteria for the heterogeneity test. ♦: pooled mean difference; —■—: mean difference and 95% CI.
Figure 8Funnel plot of acupuncture versus no acupuncture on efficacy rate.
Figure 9Egger's publication bias plot of the efficacy rate.