| Literature DB >> 33354145 |
Mohammed S ALEissa1, Ibrahim A AlGhofaili1, Haifa F Alotaibe1, Maram T Yaslam1, Mohammed S AlMujil1, Maha M Arnous2, Sultan K Al Dalbhi3.
Abstract
Hypoglycemia is a common complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), more so if they have diabetes as well. The occurrence of hypoglycemia in CKD is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, both of which are treatable and preventable. This review summarizes the incidence and risk factors associated with hypoglycemia among patients with CKD. The meta-analysis was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. A search was done on PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature for cohort studies in English published between January 2000 and August 2019 using search terms related to hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), chronic kidney disease (chronic renal failure OR renal failure), and incidence (risk OR epidemiology OR risk factors). Summary measures were calculated using random-effects model. A total of 5 studies involving 311,817 persons were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of hypoglycemia in patients with CKD was 0.188 (confidence interval [CI] = 0.097-0.287). The incidence of hypoglycemia was significantly higher in patients with CKD than in patients without CKD (Relative risk [RR] = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.86-1.92, P < 0.0001). No heterogeneity was reported between the studies (I2 = 0%, P > 0.05), and publication bias was also found. Females, patients who had diabetes mellitus of long duration, and those on antidiabetic drugs such as insulin and sulfonylureas were at risk of developing hypoglycemia in CKD as per narrative review. The incidence of hypoglycemia in patients with CKD is high. Therefore, there is need to closely monitor affected individuals so that appropriate management protocols could be set up. Further probing of various risk factors for hypoglycemia in CKD patients is necessary for early detection and initiation of timely preventive and curative measures. Copyright:Entities:
Keywords: Chronic kidney disease; hypoglycemia; incidence; risk factors
Year: 2020 PMID: 33354145 PMCID: PMC7745784 DOI: 10.4103/jfcm.JFCM_304_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Community Med ISSN: 1319-1683
Figure 1Flowchart showing selection of studies
Summary matrix for studies included in the systemic review
| First author, years | Country | Study design | Study period | Study population | Sample size | Age (years) | Groups | Number of patients developing hypoglycemia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moen | USA | Retrospective cohort | 2004-2005 | General population developing CKD and diabetes | 243,222 | 73±0.04 | Hypoglycemia in CKD | 16,977/70,169 |
| Hypoglycemia in patients without CKD | 22,161/173,053 | |||||||
| Khyalappa | India | Prospective cohort | 2009-2011 | CKD Stage V with and without diabetes | 100 | NA | Hypoglycemia in patients with CKD | 46/100 |
| Yun | South Korea | Prospective longitudinal cohort | 2000-2012 | All patients with Type II DM | 871 | 55.3±9.8 | Hypoglycemia in micro- and macroalbuminuria | 33/190 |
| Hypoglycemia in normoalbuminuria | 71/681 | |||||||
| Chu | Taiwan | Longitudinal cohort | 2002-2008 | ESRD with diabetes | 20845 | NA | Single arm | 3998/20,845 |
| Hsiao | Taiwan | Retrospective cohort | 1997-2011 | DM and ESRD | 46,779 | 60.45±3.96 | Single arm | 5379/46,779 |
CKD: Chronic kidney disease, DM: Diabetes mellitus, ESRD: End-stage renal disease, NA: Not available
Quality assessment of studies
| GRACE checklist | Moen | Khyalappa | Yun | Chu | Hsiao |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1. Were treatment and/or important details of treatment exposure adequately recorded for the study purpose in the data sources? | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| D2. Were the primary outcomes adequately recorded for the study purpose? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| D3. Was the primary clinical outcome measured objectively rather than subject to clinical judgment? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| D4. Were primary outcomes validated, adjudicated, or otherwise known to be valid in a similar population? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| D5. Was the primary outcome measured or identified in an equivalent manner between the intervention group and the comparison groups? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| D6. Were important covariates that may be known confounders or effect modifiers available and recorded? | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| M1. Was the study (or analysis) population restricted to new initiators of treatment or those starting a new course of treatment? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| M2. If 1 or more comparison groups were used, were they concurrent comparators? If not, did the authors justify the use of historical comparison groups? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| M3. Were important confounding and effect modifying variables taken into account in the design and/or analysis? | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| M4. Is the classification of exposed and unexposed person-time free of “immortal time bias”? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| M5. Were any meaningful analyses conducted to test key assumptions on which primary results are based? | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Figure 2Forest plot depicting risk of hypoglycemia in chronic kidney disease patients
Figure 3Funnel plot showing publication bias
Figure 4Hypoglycemia incidence in patients with and without chronic kidney disease