Literature DB >> 33353822

Prediction of remnant liver volume using 3D simulation software in patients undergoing R1vasc parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases: reliability, clinical impact, and learning curve.

Fabio Procopio1, Matteo Cimino2, Luca Viganò1, Anna E Colombo3, Eloisa Franchi2, Guido Costa2, Matteo Donadon1, Daniele Del Fabbro2, Guido Torzilli4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the future liver remnant (FLR) is routinely performed before major hepatectomy. In R1-vascular one-stage hepatectomy (R1vasc-OSH), given the multiplanar dissection paths, the FLR is not easily predictable. Preoperative 3D-virtual casts may help. We evaluated the predictability of the FLR using the 3D-virtual cast in the R1vasc-OSH for multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CLM).
METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with multiple bilobar CLMs scheduled for R1vasc-OSH were included. Predicted and real-FLRs were compared. Propensity score-matched analysis was used to determine the impact of 3D-virtual cast on postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Median number of CLM and resection areas were 12 (4-33) and 3 (1-8). Median predicted-FLR was 899 ml (558-1157) and 60% (42-85), while for the real-FLR 915 ml (566-1777) and 63% (43-87). Median discrepancy between predicted and real-FLR was -0.6% (p = 0.504), indicating a slight tendency to underestimate the FLR. The difference was more evident in more than 12 CLMs (p = 0.013). A discrepancy was not evident according to the number of resection areas (p = 0.316). No mortality occurred. Patients in virtual-group had lower major complications compared to nonvirtual-group (0% vs 18%, p-value 0.014).
CONCLUSION: FLR estimation based on 3D-analysis is feasible, provides a safe surgery and represents a promising method in planning R1vasc-OSH for patients with multiple bilobar CLMs.
Copyright © 2020 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33353822     DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  4 in total

1.  International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology (IPSO) Surgical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Simone de Campos Vieira Abib; Chan Hon Chui; Sharon Cox; Abdelhafeez H Abdelhafeez; Israel Fernandez-Pineda; Ahmed Elgendy; Jonathan Karpelowsky; Pablo Lobos; Marc Wijnen; Jörg Fuchs; Andrea Hayes; Justin T Gerstle
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2022-02-17

2.  Is the exposure to liver transplantation worthwhile for trainees in liver surgery?

Authors:  Matteo Donadon; Paolo Baroffio
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 8.265

Review 3.  Essential updates 2020/2021: Current topics of simulation and navigation in hepatectomy.

Authors:  Yu Saito; Mitsuo Shimada; Yuji Morine; Shinichiro Yamada; Maki Sugimoto
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-12-23

Review 4.  Perioperative Management of Complex Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: The Alliance between the Surgeon and the Anesthetist.

Authors:  Enrico Giustiniano; Fulvio Nisi; Laura Rocchi; Paola C Zito; Nadia Ruggieri; Matteo M Cimino; Guido Torzilli; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.