Jennifer A Campbell1,2, Alice Yan3, Leonard E Egede1,2. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 2. Center for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 3. Joseph Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic evaluation of community-based participatory research (CBPR) interventions on diabetes outcomes. Understanding of effective CBPR interventions on diabetes outcomes is limited, and findings remain unclear. METHODS: A reproducible search strategy was used to identify studies testing CBPR interventions to improve diabetes outcomes, including A1C, fasting glucose, blood pressure, lipids, and quality of life. Pubmed, PsychInfo, and CINAHL were searched for articles published between 2010 and 2020. Using a CBPR continuum framework, studies were classified based on outreach, consulting, involving, collaborating, and shared leadership. RESULTS: A total of 172 were screened, and a title search was conducted to determine eligibility. A total of 16 articles were included for synthesis. Twelve out of the 16 studies using CBPR approaches for diabetes interventions demonstrated statistically significant differences in 1 or more diabetes outcomes measured at a postintervention time point. Studies across the spectrum of CBPR demonstrated statistically significant improvements in diabetes outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 16 studies included for synthesis, 14 demonstrated statistically significant changes in A1C, fasting glucose, blood pressure, lipids, and quality of life. The majority of studies used community health workers (CHWs) to deliver interventions across group and individual settings and demonstrated significant reductions in diabetes outcomes. The evidence summarized in this review shows the pivotal role that CHWs and diabetes care and education specialists play in not only intervention delivery but also in the development of outward-facing diabetes care approaches that are person- and community-centered.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic evaluation of community-based participatory research (CBPR) interventions on diabetes outcomes. Understanding of effective CBPR interventions on diabetes outcomes is limited, and findings remain unclear. METHODS: A reproducible search strategy was used to identify studies testing CBPR interventions to improve diabetes outcomes, including A1C, fasting glucose, blood pressure, lipids, and quality of life. Pubmed, PsychInfo, and CINAHL were searched for articles published between 2010 and 2020. Using a CBPR continuum framework, studies were classified based on outreach, consulting, involving, collaborating, and shared leadership. RESULTS: A total of 172 were screened, and a title search was conducted to determine eligibility. A total of 16 articles were included for synthesis. Twelve out of the 16 studies using CBPR approaches for diabetes interventions demonstrated statistically significant differences in 1 or more diabetes outcomes measured at a postintervention time point. Studies across the spectrum of CBPR demonstrated statistically significant improvements in diabetes outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 16 studies included for synthesis, 14 demonstrated statistically significant changes in A1C, fasting glucose, blood pressure, lipids, and quality of life. The majority of studies used community health workers (CHWs) to deliver interventions across group and individual settings and demonstrated significant reductions in diabetes outcomes. The evidence summarized in this review shows the pivotal role that CHWs and diabetes care and education specialists play in not only intervention delivery but also in the development of outward-facing diabetes care approaches that are person- and community-centered.
Authors: Michael S Spencer; Ann-Marie Rosland; Edith C Kieffer; Brandy R Sinco; Melissa Valerio; Gloria Palmisano; Michael Anderson; J Ricardo Guzman; Michele Heisler Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Tai J Mendenhall; Jerica M Berge; Peter Harper; Betty GreenCrow; Nan LittleWalker; Sheila WhiteEagle; Steve BrownOwl Journal: Nurs Inq Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.393
Authors: Nadia S Islam; Laura C Wyatt; Shilpa D Patel; Ephraim Shapiro; S Darius Tandon; B Runi Mukherji; Michael Tanner; Mariano J Rey; Chau Trinh-Shevrin Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2013-06-07 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Rebecca Delafield; Andrea Nacapoy Hermosura; Claire Townsend Ing; Claire K Hughes; Donna-Marie Palakiko; Adrienne Dillard; B Puni Kekauoha; Sheryl R Yoshimura; Shari Gamiao; Joseph Keawe Kaholokula Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2016
Authors: Amy West-Pollak; Eddy P Then; Carlos Podesta; Anne Hedelt; Mary Lou Perry; Wendy V Izarnotegui; Margarita Perez; Antonio Villegas; Nelson I Baez; Rimsky Bassa; Gabriella Mendez; Karmina Hernandez; David S Lim; Pedro Urena; Angela M Taylor Journal: Int Health Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 2.473
Authors: Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Sarah Addison; Yesol Yang; Faith Metlock; Mikayla King; Alicia McKoy; Amaris Williams; John Gregory; Darrell M Gray; Joshua J Joseph; Timiya S Nolan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-23 Impact factor: 4.614