| Literature DB >> 33353020 |
Athanasios Zervas1, Marie Rønne Aggerbeck1, Henrietta Allaga2, Mustafa Güzel3, Marc Hendriks4, IIona Jonuškienė5, Orsolya Kedves2, Ayse Kupeli6, Janja Lamovšek7, Pascal Mülner8, Denise Munday9, Şahin Namli6, Hilal Samut6, Ružica Tomičić10, Zorica Tomičić11, Filiz Yeni6, Raida Zribi Zghal12,13, Xingchen Zhao14, Vincent Sanchis-Borja15, Niels Bohse Hendriksen1.
Abstract
The phylogeny, identification, and characterization of 33 B. cereus sensu lato isolates originating from 17 agricultural soils from 11 countries were analyzed on the basis of whole genome sequencing. Phylogenetic analyses revealed all isolates are divided into six groups, which follows the generally accepted phylogenetic division of B. cereus sensu lato isolates. Four different identification methods resulted in a variation in the identity of the isolates, as none of the isolates were identified as the same species by all four methods-only the recent identification method proposed directly reflected the phylogeny of the isolates. This points to the importance of describing the basis and method used for the identification. The presence and percent identity of the protein product of 19 genes potentially involved in pathogenicity divided the 33 isolates into groups corresponding to phylogenetic division of the isolates. This suggests that different pathotypes exist and that it is possible to differentiate between them by comparing the percent identity of proteins potentially involved in pathogenicity. This also reveals that a basic link between phylogeny and pathogenicity is likely to exist. The geographical distribution of the isolates is not random: they are distributed in relation to their division into the six phylogenetic groups, which again relates to different ecotypes with different temperature growth ranges. This means that we find it easier to analyze and understand the results obtained from the 33 B. cereus sensu lato isolates in a phylogenetic, patho-type and ecotype-oriented context, than in a context based on uncertain identification at the species level.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus mosaicus; Bacillus mycoides; Bacillus thuringiensis; Bacillus toyonensis; ecotypes; geographical-distribution; patho-types; phylogeny
Year: 2020 PMID: 33353020 PMCID: PMC7766411 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8122028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607