Natalia Danek1, Kamil Michalik2, Marcin Smolarek1, Marek Zatoń1. 1. Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland. 2. Department of Human Motor Skills, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland.
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to compare acute physiological, biochemical, and perceptual responses during sprint interval exercise (SIE) with breathing through a device increasing added respiratory dead space volume (ARDSV) and without the device. Methods: The study involved 11 healthy, physically active men (mean maximal oxygen uptake: 52.6 ± 8.2 mL∙kg1∙min-1). During four visits to a laboratory with a minimum interval of 72 h, they participated in (1) an incremental test on a cycle ergometer; (2) a familiarization session; (3) and (4) cross-over SIE sessions. SIE consisted of 6 × 10-s all-out bouts with 4-min active recovery. During one of the sessions the participants breathed through a 1200-mL ARDSv (SIEARDS). Results: The work performed was significantly higher by 4.4% during SIEARDS, with no differences in the fatigue index. The mean respiratory ventilation was significantly higher by 13.2%, and the mean oxygen uptake was higher by 31.3% during SIEARDS. Respiratory muscle strength did not change after the two SIE sessions. In SIEARDS, the mean pH turned out significantly lower (7.26 vs. 7.29), and the mean HCO3- concentration was higher by 7.6%. Average La- and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) did not differ between the sessions. Conclusions: Using ARDSV during SIE provokes respiratory acidosis, causes stronger acute physiological responses, and does not increase RPE.
Background: The aim of the study was to compare acute physiological, biochemical, and perceptual responses during sprint interval exercise (SIE) with breathing through a device increasing added respiratory dead space volume (ARDSV) and without the device. Methods: The study involved 11 healthy, physically active men (mean maximal oxygen uptake: 52.6 ± 8.2 mL∙kg1∙min-1). During four visits to a laboratory with a minimum interval of 72 h, they participated in (1) an incremental test on a cycle ergometer; (2) a familiarization session; (3) and (4) cross-over SIE sessions. SIE consisted of 6 × 10-s all-out bouts with 4-min active recovery. During one of the sessions the participants breathed through a 1200-mL ARDSv (SIEARDS). Results: The work performed was significantly higher by 4.4% during SIEARDS, with no differences in the fatigue index. The mean respiratory ventilation was significantly higher by 13.2%, and the mean oxygen uptake was higher by 31.3% during SIEARDS. Respiratory muscle strength did not change after the two SIE sessions. In SIEARDS, the mean pH turned out significantly lower (7.26 vs. 7.29), and the mean HCO3- concentration was higher by 7.6%. Average La- and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) did not differ between the sessions. Conclusions: Using ARDSV during SIE provokes respiratory acidosis, causes stronger acute physiological responses, and does not increase RPE.