| Literature DB >> 33352788 |
Anwar M Hashem1,2, Rowa Y Alhabbab1,3, Abdullah Algaissi4,5, Mohamed A Alfaleh1,6, Sharif Hala7,8, Turki S Abujamel1,3, M-Zaki ElAssouli1, Afrah A Al-Somali9, Fadwa S Alofi10, Asim A Khogeer11, Almohanad A Alkayyal12, Ahmad Bakur Mahmoud13, Naif A M Almontashiri13,14, Arnab Pain7,15,16.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), continues to spread globally. Although several rapid commercial serological assays have been developed, little is known about their performance and accuracy in detecting SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in COVID-19 patient samples. Here, we have evaluated the performance of seven commercially available rapid lateral flow immunoassays (LFIA) obtained from different manufacturers, and compared them to in-house developed and validated ELISA assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgM and IgG antibodies in RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients. While all evaluated LFIA assays showed high specificity, our data showed a significant variation in sensitivity of these assays, which ranged from 0% to 54% for samples collected early during infection (3-7 days post symptoms onset) and from 54% to 88% for samples collected at later time points during infection (8-27 days post symptoms onset). Therefore, we recommend prior evaluation and validation of these assays before being routinely used to detect IgM and IgG in COVID-19 patients. Moreover, our findings suggest the use of LFIA assays in combination with other standard methods, and not as an alternative.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antibodies; rapid assay; serology
Year: 2020 PMID: 33352788 PMCID: PMC7767212 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens9121067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817