Literature DB >> 33352329

A comparison of the accuracy of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis.

Lihua Sun1, Liwei Yao2, Genlian Fu3, Lihua Lin4, Enlan Zhu5, Jinpeng Huang6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the efficiency of the CapitalBioMycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection test with the standard Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM).
METHODS: We analyzed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from 163 patients with suspected TBM that were collected between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. For both tests, we determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC). Next, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of the two techniques using clinical diagnosis as a reference standard.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC, of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test were 48.5%, 100%, 100%, 29.6%, and 0.74, respectively, when used for the diagnosis of TBM. In comparison, the Xpert MTB/RIF assay returned values of 47.0%, 100%, 100%, 29.0%, and 0.74, respectively. Our analysis showed that the diagnostic accuracies of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium detection test and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay were very similar; the accuracy of both tests for detecting mycobacteria was significantly higher than that associated with acid-fast staining.
CONCLUSIONS: The CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time PCR detection test has moderate sensitivity and very high specificity for TBM; results are very similar to those generated by the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. We recommend that the CapitalBio PCR test should be used as an initial screening method for TB.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CapitalBio; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Real-time polymerase chain reaction; Tuberculous meningitis; Xpert MTB/RIF

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33352329     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.12.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1201-9712            Impact factor:   3.623


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the Accuracy of Two Different Molecular Tests for the Diagnosis of Tuberculous Lymphadenitis Using Core Needle Biopsy Specimens: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Authors:  Yanqin Shen; Weixian Jiang; Liwei Yao; Xudong Xu; Gang Chen
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF and CapitalBio Mycobacterium RT-PCR Detection Assay for Tuberculous Pericarditis.

Authors:  Guocan Yu; Fangming Zhong; Linhua Wang; Yanqin Shen; Likui Fang; Jun Yang; Bo Ye; Kan Xu
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  The Role of Core Needle Biopsy Pathology Combined with Molecular Tests in the Diagnosis of Lymph Node Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Guocan Yu; Lihong Zhou; Yanqin Shen; Likui Fang; Bo Ye; Xudong Xu
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Comparing Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA Accuracy in Various Respiratory Specimens for the Rapid Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Guocan Yu; Yiming Ye; Xiaowei Qiu; Sipei Zheng; Jun Yang
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.177

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.