Literature DB >> 33351832

Perceptual harmony in judgments of group prototypicality and intragroup respect.

Joshua D Wright1, L James Climenhage1, Michael T Schmitt1, Nyla R Branscombe2.   

Abstract

We test common sense psychology of intragroup relations whereby people assume that intragroup respect and ingroup prototypicality are positively related. In Study 1a, participants rated a group member as more prototypical if they learned that group member was highly respected rather than disrespected. In Study 1b, participants rated a group member as more respected by other group members if they learned that group member was prototypical rather than unprototypical. As a commonsense psychology of groups, we reasoned that the perceived relationship between prototypicality and intragroup respect would be stronger for cohesive groups compared to incohesive groups. The effect of intragroup respect on perceptions of prototypicality (Study 2a & 2c) and the effect of prototypicality on perceptions of intragroup respect (Study 2b) were generally stronger for participants considering cohesive groups relative to incohesive groups. However, the interaction effect of prototypicality and group cohesion on intragroup respect did fail to replicate in Study 2d. In Studies 3, 4a, and 4b we manipulated the relationship between prototypicality and intragroup respect and found that when these variables were in perceptual harmony participants perceived groups as more cohesive. The results of eight out of nine studies conducted are consistent with the prediction that people make inferences about intragroup respect, prototypicality, and group cohesion in a manner that maintains perceptual harmony.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33351832      PMCID: PMC7755273          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  13 in total

1.  Classification and quantitative judgement.

Authors:  H TAJFEL; A L WILKES
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1963-05

2.  Better P-curves: Making P-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious P-hacking, a Reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015).

Authors:  Uri Simonsohn; Joseph P Simmons; Leif D Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-12

3.  Perceptions of entitativity and attitude change.

Authors:  Robert J Rydell; Allen R McConnell
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-01

4.  Substitutes for procedural fairness: prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not.

Authors:  Johannes Ullrich; Oliver Christ; Rolf van Dick
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2009-01

5.  Testing an integrative model of respect: implications for social engagement and well-being.

Authors:  Yuen J Huo; Kevin R Binning; Ludwin E Molina
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-12-23

6.  Concepts and folk theories.

Authors:  Susan A Gelman; Cristine H Legare
Journal:  Annu Rev Anthropol       Date:  2011-06-29

7.  Personality in its natural habitat: manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life.

Authors:  Matthias R Mehl; Samuel D Gosling; James W Pennebaker
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2006-05

8.  The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.

Authors:  Ulrich Schimmack
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-08-27

9.  Too True to be Bad: When Sets of Studies With Significant and Nonsignificant Findings Are Probably True.

Authors:  Daniël Lakens; Alexander J Etz
Journal:  Soc Psychol Personal Sci       Date:  2017-05-05

10.  TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences.

Authors:  Leib Litman; Jonathan Robinson; Tzvi Abberbock
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.