Literature DB >> 33351831

Manufacturing of convalescent plasma of COVID-19 patients: Aspects of quality.

Viola Hähnel1, David Peterhoff2, Veronika Bäuerlein1, Andreas-Michael Brosig1, Irene Pamler1, Christian Johnson1, Adelina Bica1, Monica Totir1, Thomas Ossner1, Barbara Stemmer1, Martina Toelge2, Anja Schütz2, Hans-Helmut Niller2,3, Barbara Schmidt2,3, Ralf Wagner2,3, André Gessner2,3, Ralph Burkhard1, Robert Offner1.   

Abstract

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic emerged in December 2019. Convalescent plasma represents a promising COVID-19 treatment. Here, we report on the manufacturing of a plasma-based product containing antibodies specific to SARS-CoV-2 obtained from recently recovered COVID-19 patients. Convalescent plasma donors were screened as follows: 1) previously confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (by real-time PCR (RT-PCR)); 2) a subsequent negative PCR test followed by a 2-week waiting period; 3) an additional negative PCR test prior to plasmapheresis; and 4) confirmation of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies. Convalescent plasma was stored fresh (2-6°C) for up to 5 days or frozen (-30°C) for long-term storage. Donor peripheral blood and final plasma product were assayed for binding antibodies targeting the SARS-CoV-2 S-protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) and their titers measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We performed 72 plasmaphereses resulting in 248 final products. Convalescent plasma contained an RBD-specific antibody titer (IgG) ranging from 1:100 to 1:3200 (median 1:800). The titer was congruent to the titer of the blood (n = 34) before collection (1:100-1:6400, median 1:800). Levels of IL-8 and LBP of donors were slightly increased. Therapeutic products derived from a human origin must undergo rigorous testing to ensure uniform quality and patient safety. Whilst previous publications recommended RBD-specific binding antibody titers of ≥ 1:320, we selected a minimum titer of 1:800 in order to maximize antibody delivery. Production of highly standardized convalescent plasma was safe, feasible and was readily implemented in the treatment of severely ill COVID-19 patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33351831     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  4 in total

Review 1.  Regulatory challenges of convalescent plasma collection during the evolving stages of COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

Authors:  Sajjad Hassan; Kamille A West; Kathleen Conry-Cantilena; Valeria De Giorgi
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.337

2.  Characterization of convalescent plasma: Findings reported between aliquots of donors and units processed in a Blood Bank in Lima-Peru.

Authors:  Alfredo Goytendia; Veralucia De la Vega; Ina Perez
Journal:  Hematol Transfus Cell Ther       Date:  2022-09-19

Review 3.  A Review on Effectiveness of Plasma Therapy in Severe COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Kartik Kapil; Pramita Muntode Gharde
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-07

4.  Donors for SARS-CoV-2 Convalescent Plasma for a Controlled Clinical Trial: Donor Characteristics, Content and Time Course of SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies.

Authors:  Sixten Körper; Bernd Jahrsdörfer; Victor M Corman; Jan Pilch; Patrick Wuchter; Rainer Blasczyk; Rebecca Müller; Torsten Tonn; Tamam Bakchoul; Richard Schäfer; David Juhl; Tatjana Schwarz; Nina Gödecke; Thomas Burkhardt; Michael Schmidt; Thomas Appl; Hermann Eichler; Harald Klüter; Christian Drosten; Erhard Seifried; Hubert Schrezenmeier
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.747

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.