Literature DB >> 33351807

Practice-based analysis of direct posterior dental restorations performed in a public health service: Retrospective long-term survival in Brazil.

Renata Afonso da Silva Pereira1, Gisele Rodrigues da Silva1, Luciana Mendes Barcelos1, Karoline Guará Brusaca Almeida Cavalcanti2, Álex Moreira Herval3, Thiago Machado Ardenghi4, Carlos José Soares1.   

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the survival and associated factors for the longevity of direct posterior restorations and to verify whether the geographic location of public health units could influence the long-term survival of such restorations. Data were extracted from electronic patient files of the Brazilian public oral health services. The sample comprised 2,405 class I and II restorations performed 4 to 24 years ago (mean, 8.9 years) in 351 patients (6.8 teeth/patient) across 12 public health units located in different city regions (42 professionals-55 restorations). The restoration was considered successful if it had not been repaired or replaced at the time of evaluation; failure was defined as replacement of the restoration, the need for endodontic treatment, tooth/restoration fracture or tooth extraction. Data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier test for restoration survival and Cox regression to evaluate the factors associated with failure. The majority of the restorations involved the use of amalgam (85%), involved a single face (70%), and were without pulp/dentin capping (85%). The overall survival rate was 95%, and the mean observation time was 8.9 years. The restoration survival was 79% (95% CI: 60.6-89.5) over 24 years, and the mean survival time was 22.2 years (95% CI: 21.9-22.6 years). The annual failure rate up to 24 years was 0.9%. After the adjustment, only the number of restored faces and the geographic location where the restoration was performed remained associated with failure of the restoration. The direct posterior restorations performed at the evaluated public health service units presented high survival rates. The restorations of people with lower access to POHS had lower survival rates. Class I restorations presented higher survival rates than class II restorations with two or more faces, regardless of the restorative material used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33351807      PMCID: PMC7755217          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  44 in total

1.  The longevity of direct and indirect posterior restorations is uncertain and may be affected by a number of dentist-, patient-, and material-related factors.

Authors:  Gary R Goldstein
Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.267

2.  Filling cavities or restoring teeth?

Authors:  Antheunis Versluis; Daranee Versluis-Tantbirojn
Journal:  J Tenn Dent Assoc       Date:  2011

Review 3.  Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults – A systematic review.

Authors:  Álfheiður Ástvaldsdóttir; Jessica Dagerhamn; Jan W V van Dijken; Aron Naimi-Akbar; Gunilla Sandborgh-Englund; Sofia Tranæus; Mikael Nilsson
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 2: Amalgam restorations - time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth.

Authors:  F J T Burke; P S K Lucarotti
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Amalgam or composite fillings--which material lasts longer?

Authors:  Dominic Hurst
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2014-06

6.  Caries Management by Risk Assessment: Results from a Practice-Based Research Network Study.

Authors:  Peter Rechmann; Benjamin W Chaffee; Beate M T Rechmann; John D B Featherstone
Journal:  J Calif Dent Assoc       Date:  2019-01

7.  Economic crisis, austerity and its effects on the financing of oral health and access to public and private services.

Authors:  Thais Regis Aranha Rossi; José Eudes de Lorena Sobrinho; Sonia Cristina Lima Chaves; Petrônio José de Lima Martelli
Journal:  Cien Saude Colet       Date:  2019-08-30

8.  Agreement among dentists' restorative treatment planning thresholds for primary occlusal caries, primary proximal caries, and existing restorations: findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Tim J Heaven; Valeria V Gordan; Mark S Litaker; Jeffrey L Fellows; D Brad Rindal; Allen R Firestone; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland.

Authors:  I A Mjör; C Shen; S T Eliasson; S Richter
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.440

10.  A prospective 8-year follow-up of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth of children and adolescents in Public Dental Health Service: reasons for replacement.

Authors:  Ulla Pallesen; Jan W V van Dijken; Jette Halken; Anna-Lena Hallonsten; Ruth Höigaard
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.