Literature DB >> 33351139

Evaluation of biological and economic efficiency of the All Heifer, No Cow beef production system using a system dynamics model based on 6 yr of demonstration herd data.

Meredith A Harrison1, John J Sheehan2, George E Seidel3, Dan F Mooney4, Ryan D Rhoades1, Jason K Ahola1.   

Abstract

Alternative management strategies with no cows and all heifers may improve biological and economic efficiency of beef production. The All Heifer, No Cow (AHNC) beef production system involves insemination of nulliparous heifers with female sex-selected semen (FSS) to produce primarily female calves that are early weaned at 3 mo of age. Dams are finished on a high concentrate diet and harvested before 30 mo of age. The objectives of this research were to: 1) build a dynamic model of an AHNC beef production system to quantify system biological and economic efficiency; 2) compare effects of utilizing FSS vs. conventional semen on biological and economic efficiency; 3) evaluate what-if scenarios to determine the effects on biological and economic efficiency of changing variables ±5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% from initial observed values; and 4) evaluate the effects on biological and economic efficiency of changing variables ±10% from initial observed values. A model was built over a 21-yr horizon using Stella Architect. Biological parameter values in the model were based on the 6 yr of data collected from the management of an AHNC demonstration herd. In the model animal, total digestible nutrients (TDN) intake, hot carcass weight (HCW), and age at harvest were randomized. Feed, animal, and carcass prices included in the model were based on 10 yr of historical U.S. price data. Key response variables were biological and economic efficiency (mean ± SD). Biological efficiency was defined as the ratio of output (kilograms of HCW produced) to input (lifetime kilograms of feed TDN consumed), and economic efficiency was measured using a benefit-cost ratio (BCR) and unit variable cost (UVC). Over 40 simulation runs, the predicted mean biological efficiency was 0.0714 ± 0.0008. Economic efficiency was 0.95 ± 0.02 and US $445.41 ± 0.06 for BCR and UVC, respectively. Biological and economic efficiency was improved in the conventional semen scenario; biological efficiency was 0.0738 ± 0.0008, and BCR and UVC were 0.99 ± 0.04 and US $407.24 ± 0.006, respectively. Under this parameterization and market conditions, the AHNC beef production system failed to achieve profitability under any scenario that was evaluated. However, this review did not account for the potential increased genetic benefit from a decreased generation interval and the reduction in feed energy in comparison to a conventional cow/calf system.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beef production system; biological efficiency; economic efficiency; single-calf heifer system; system dynamics

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33351139      PMCID: PMC7819636          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

1.  Simulation of cow-calf production systems in a range environment: II. Model evaluation.

Authors:  M W Tess; B W Kolstad
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Update on sexed semen technology in cattle.

Authors:  G E Seidel
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the Earth sciences.

Authors:  N Oreskes; K Shrader-Frechette; K Belitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Effects of heterosis on reproduction in Herford, Angus and Shorthorn cattle.

Authors:  L V Cundiff; K E Gregory; R M Koch
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Cow type and the nutritional environment: nutritional aspects.

Authors:  C L Ferrell; T G Jenkins
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Life cycle efficiency of beef production: I. Cow efficiency ratios for progeny weaned.

Authors:  M E Davis; J J Rutledge; L V Cundiff; E R Hauser
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Simulated efficiency of range beef production. III. Culling strategies and nontraditional management systems.

Authors:  R M Bourdon; J S Brinks
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  A simulation-based approach for evaluating and comparing the environmental footprints of beef production systems.

Authors:  C A Rotz; B J Isenberg; K R Stackhouse-Lawson; E J Pollak
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  BEEF SPECIES SYMPOSIUM: Beef production without mature cows.

Authors:  G E Seidel; J C Whittier
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.159

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Economic Analysis of an Image-Based Beef Carcass Yield Estimation System in Korea.

Authors:  Collins Wakholi; Shona Nabwire; Juntae Kim; Jeong Hwan Bae; Moon Sung Kim; Insuck Baek; Byoung-Kwan Cho
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.