| Literature DB >> 33350341 |
Fan Feng1, Baiquan Zeng1, Shilin Ouyang1, Yanan Zhong1, Jienan Chen2,3.
Abstract
In this study, contrary to untreated poplar fiber, processing of alkali-treated poplar fiber was optimized for the enzymatic saccharification. Considering reducing sugar content as the evaluation index, pH, temperature, time, amount of enzyme, and rotational speed of shaker were standardized to optimize the sugar production by enzymatic hydrolysis. Using response surface methodology, the optimum technological condition of enzymatic hydrolysis was found to be utilizing 43 mg cellulase at 46 °C for 50 h. At this, the sugar conversion amount of NaOH or H2O2-NaOH pretreated poplar was 164.62 mg/g and 218.82 mg/g respectively. It was a corresponding increase of 446.73% or 626.75% than that of poplar fiber without a pretreatment. At a low concentration, metal ions and surfactants promoted the conversion of reducing sugar. Especially, 0.01 g/L Mn2+ and 0.50 g/L hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) produced the best effect and increased the conversion rate of reducing sugar by 23.62% and 21.44% respectively. Also, the effect of the combination of metal ions and surfactants was better than that of a single accelerator. By improving the enzymatic process, these findings could enhance the utilization of poplar fiber for the production of reducing sugar.Entities:
Keywords: Alkali treatment; metal ion; response surface; saccharification; surfactant
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33350341 PMCID: PMC8806347 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2020.1857576
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Figure 1.Types of lignin sugar complexes linkages
Main instrument
| Name | Type | Country |
|---|---|---|
| Electronic balance | AL204 | America |
| Miniature plant grinder | FZ102 | China |
| Automatic high pressure steam sterilizer | DAIHANLABTECH Co | Japan |
| Electronic universal furnace | 1 KW | China |
| Desktop high speed centrifuge | H/T18MM | China |
| Electric blast drying box | WGL-230B | China |
| Muffle furnace | SX2-4-10 T | China |
| Tabletop thermostat oscillator | IS-RDD3 | China |
| Ultraviolet visible spectrophotometer | UV-8100B | China |
| Precision digital display acidity meter | PHS-3B | China |
Factors and levels of Plackett-Burman design
| Number | Factors | Low | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Enzyme addition | 30 | 40 |
| B | Material-liquid ratio | 10 | 20 |
| C | Time | 40 | 48 |
| D | Temperature | 40 | 50 |
| E | pH | 4.6 | 4.8 |
| F | Shaking speed | 150 | 200 |
| G | - | - | - |
| H | - | - | - |
| J | - | - | - |
| K | - | - | - |
| L | - | - | - |
Figure 2.Effects of different factors on the yield of reducing sugar
ANOVA for Response Surface Quadratic Model Analysis of variance table [Partial sum of squares – Type III]
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean | F | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 34,463.79 | 9 | 3829.31 | 325.62 | < 0.0001 | significant | |
| A- Enzyme addition | 1697.00 | 1 | 1697.00 | 144.30 | < 0.0001 | ||
| B- Time | 865.59 | 1 | 865.59 | 73.60 | < 0.0001 | ||
| C- Temperature | 18,010.98 | 1 | 18,010.98 | 1531.54 | < 0.0001 | ||
| AB | 75.65 | 1 | 75.65 | 6.43 | 0.0389 | ||
| AC | 15.57 | 1 | 15.57 | 1.32 | 0.2876 | ||
| BC | 236.27 | 1 | 236.27 | 20.09 | 0.0029 | ||
| A2 | 59.03 | 1 | 59.03 | 5.02 | 0.0600 | ||
| B2 | 85.68 | 1 | 85.68 | 7.29 | 0.0307 | ||
| C2 | 13,115.26 | 1 | 13,115.26 | 1115.24 | < 0.0001 | ||
| Residual | 82.32 | 7 | 11.76 | ||||
| Lack of Fit | 50.01 | 3 | 16.67 | 2.06 | 0.2477 | not significant | |
| Pure Error | 32.31 | 4 | 8.08 | ||||
| Cor Total | 34,546.11 | 16 | |||||
Figure 3.Response surface of the effect of different factors on the conversion of reducing sugar
Figure 4.Comparison of reducing sugar production by different pretreatment methods
Figure 5.Effect of different metal ions on the conversion of reducing sugar
Figure 6.Effect of different surfactants on the conversion of reducing sugar
Figure 7.Effect of the mixture of metal ions and surfactants on reducing sugar
Effect of Pretreatment on Poplar components (%)
| Pretreatment method | Cellulose | Hemicellulose | Lignin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw material | 46.91 | 23.35 | 24.78 |
| NaOH | 64.60 | 14.89 | 19.28 |
| H2O2- NaOH | 65.50 | 16.40 | 17.32 |
Figure 8.Scanning electron microscope images of poplar with different pretreatment methods
Different metal ion addition concentrations
| Metal ion concentration (g/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na+ | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.01 | 0.015 | 0.02 |
| K+ | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.01 | 0.015 | 0.02 |
| Mn2+ | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.01 | 0.015 | 0.02 |
| Mg2+ | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.09 |
| Ca2+ | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.09 |
| Fe2+ | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.07 |
| Cu2+ | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.21 |
Different surfactant concentration
| Surfactant concentration (g/L, ml/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTAB(S) | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| Citric acid (S) | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
| Tween-80 (L) | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| Glycerol (L) | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 |
Plackett-Burman design test factors and response values
| | A | B | C | D | E | F | Value(R) |
| 1 | 30 | -1 | 40 | 40 | 4.6 | 150 | 94.7281 |
| 2 | 40 | -1 | 48 | 50 | 4.8 | 150 | 157.062 |
| 3 | 30 | 1 | 48 | 40 | 4.8 | 200 | 125.417 |
| 4 | 30 | -1 | 40 | 50 | 4.6 | 200 | 125.402 |
| 5 | 40 | -1 | 48 | 50 | 4.6 | 200 | 156.077 |
| 6 | 30 | 1 | 48 | 50 | 4.6 | 150 | 144.998 |
| 7 | 40 | 1 | 40 | 40 | 4.6 | 200 | 127.285 |
| 8 | 40 | 1 | 40 | 50 | 4.8 | 200 | 138.094 |
| 9 | 30 | -1 | 48 | 40 | 4.8 | 200 | 106.101 |
| 10 | 40 | -1 | 40 | 40 | 4.8 | 150 | 100.047 |
| 11 | 30 | 1 | 40 | 50 | 4.8 | 150 | 123.291 |
| 12 | 40 | 1 | 48 | 40 | 4.6 | 150 | 125.789 |
ANOVA for selected factorial model Analysis of variance table
| Source | Sum of | df | Mean | F | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 4133.93 | 6 | 688.99 | 11.99 | 0.0077 | significant |
| A- enzyme addition | 593.85 | 1 | 593.85 | 10.33 | 0.0236 | |
| B- substrate liquid to material ratio | 172.20 | 1 | 172.20 | 3.00 | 0.1440 | |
| C- time | 946.90 | 1 | 946.90 | 16.48 | 0.0097 | |
| D- temperature | 2284.10 | 1 | 2284.10 | 39.75 | 0.0015 | |
| E-pH | 49.07 | 1 | 49.07 | 0.85 | 0.3978 | |
| F- shaker speed | 87.81 | 1 | 87.81 | 1.53 | 0.2713 | |
| Residual | 287.34 | 5 | 57.47 | |||
| Cor Total | 4421.27 | 11 |
Box-Benhnken test factors and their levels
| Influence factor | Level | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | |
| A-Enzyme addition (mg) | 30 | 40 | 50 |
| C-Time (h) | 40 | 48 | 56 |
| C-Temperature (°C) | 40 | 50 | 60 |
Box-Benhnken test factors and response values
| Number | A | B | C | Value(R) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 37.777 |
| 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 38.589 |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 149.721 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 146.079 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150.493 |
| 6 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 118.679 |
| 7 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 106.097 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 147.634 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 52.253 |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 161.978 |
| 11 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 150.233 |
| 12 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 117.973 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 146.373 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 142.629 |
| 15 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 140.219 |
| 16 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 145.251 |
| 17 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 28.398 |