Literature DB >> 33350168

Validation of International Working Group response criteria in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: A report on behalf of the MDS Clinical Research Consortium.

Rami S Komrokji1, Najla H Al Ali1, David Sallman1, Eric Padron1, Amy E DeZern2, John Barnard3, Gail J Roboz4, Guillermo Garcia-Manero5, Alan List1, David P Steensma6, Mikkael A Sekeres7.   

Abstract

The utility of the International Working Group (IWG) 2006 response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) as a surrogate endpoint for outcomes is unclear. We assessed the validity of the IWG 2006 response criteria in a large cohort of higher-risk MDS patients (pts) treated at centers from the MDS Clinical Research Consortium. The best overall response rate (ORR) by IWG 2006 criteria to first-line therapy among 597 evaluable pts was 38% and include complete response (CR) 16%, marrow CR (mCR) 2%, partial response (PR) 10%, hematological improvement (HI) 10%, stable disease (SD) 33%, and progressive disease (PD) 24%. CR was associated with a better overall survival (OS) compared to all other response groups (P < 0.001). Among 470 pts treated with hypomethylating agent (HMA) as first-line therapy, the overall Response Rate, defined as HI or better was 39%. The median OS from time of best response was 21 mo, 8 mo, 14 mo, 12 mo, 13 mo, and 8 mo for CR, mCR, PR, HI, SD, and PD, respectively (P < 0.001). We validated those results in a separate cohort of 539 higher-risk MDS pts treated at Moffitt Cancer Center who received first-line HMA therapy, particularly addressing the value of mCR and mCR+HI. mCR alone without HI, SD, and PD outcomes were inferior to CR, PR, mCR+HI, and HI. In conclusion, CR by IWG 2006 response criteria can be used as a surrogate endpoint for OS in higher-risk MDS pts. Any response associated with restoration of effective hematopoiesis is associated with better outcome.
© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  high-risk disease; international working group; myelodysplastic syndromes; response criteria

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33350168      PMCID: PMC7877342          DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Med        ISSN: 2045-7634            Impact factor:   4.452


  11 in total

1.  Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Peter L Greenberg; Heinz Tuechler; Julie Schanz; Guillermo Sanz; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Francesc Solé; John M Bennett; David Bowen; Pierre Fenaux; Francois Dreyfus; Hagop Kantarjian; Andrea Kuendgen; Alessandro Levis; Luca Malcovati; Mario Cazzola; Jaroslav Cermak; Christa Fonatsch; Michelle M Le Beau; Marilyn L Slovak; Otto Krieger; Michael Luebbert; Jaroslaw Maciejewski; Silvia M M Magalhaes; Yasushi Miyazaki; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Mikkael Sekeres; Wolfgang R Sperr; Reinhard Stauder; Sudhir Tauro; Peter Valent; Teresa Vallespi; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Ulrich Germing; Detlef Haase
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  P Greenberg; C Cox; M M LeBeau; P Fenaux; P Morel; G Sanz; M Sanz; T Vallespi; T Hamblin; D Oscier; K Ohyashiki; K Toyama; C Aul; G Mufti; J Bennett
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; Peter L Greenberg; John M Bennett; Bob Lowenberg; Pierre W Wijermans; Stephen D Nimer; Antonio Pinto; Miloslav Beran; Theo M de Witte; Richard M Stone; Moshe Mittelman; Guillermo F Sanz; Steven D Gore; Charles A Schiffer; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Current state of prognostication and risk stratification in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Amer M Zeidan; Steven D Gore; Eric Padron; Rami S Komrokji
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.284

5.  Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study.

Authors:  Pierre Fenaux; Ghulam J Mufti; Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg; Valeria Santini; Carlo Finelli; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Robert Schoch; Norbert Gattermann; Guillermo Sanz; Alan List; Steven D Gore; John F Seymour; John M Bennett; John Byrd; Jay Backstrom; Linda Zimmerman; David McKenzie; Cl Beach; Lewis R Silverman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  A multivariate analysis of the relationship between response and survival among patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes treated within azacitidine or conventional care regimens in the randomized AZA-001 trial.

Authors:  Steven D Gore; Pierre Fenaux; Valeria Santini; John M Bennett; Lewis R Silverman; John F Seymour; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Arlene S Swern; Charles L Beach; Alan F List
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 7.  The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes.

Authors:  James W Vardiman; Jüergen Thiele; Daniel A Arber; Richard D Brunning; Michael J Borowitz; Anna Porwit; Nancy Lee Harris; Michelle M Le Beau; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Ayalew Tefferi; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Outcomes of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes who achieve stable disease after treatment with hypomethylating agents.

Authors:  Aziz Nazha; Mikkael A Sekeres; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; John Barnard; Najla H Al Ali; Gail J Roboz; David P Steensma; Amy E DeZern; Cassie Zimmerman; Elias J Jabbour; Katrina Zell; Alan F List; Hagop M Kantarjian; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski; Rami S Komrokji
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.156

9.  Rigosertib versus best supportive care for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of hypomethylating drugs (ONTIME): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Pierre Fenaux; Aref Al-Kali; Maria R Baer; Mikkael A Sekeres; Gail J Roboz; Gianluca Gaidano; Bart L Scott; Peter Greenberg; Uwe Platzbecker; David P Steensma; Suman Kambhampati; Karl-Anton Kreuzer; Lucy A Godley; Ehab Atallah; Robert Collins; Hagop Kantarjian; Elias Jabbour; Francois E Wilhelm; Nozar Azarnia; Lewis R Silverman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Randomized Phase II Study of Azacitidine Alone or in Combination With Lenalidomide or With Vorinostat in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: North American Intergroup Study SWOG S1117.

Authors:  Mikkael A Sekeres; Megan Othus; Alan F List; Olatoyosi Odenike; Richard M Stone; Steven D Gore; Mark R Litzow; Rena Buckstein; Min Fang; Diane Roulston; Clara D Bloomfield; Anna Moseley; Aziz Nazha; Yanming Zhang; Mario R Velasco; Rakesh Gaur; Ehab Atallah; Eyal C Attar; Elina K Cook; Alyssa H Cull; Michael J Rauh; Frederick R Appelbaum; Harry P Erba
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 50.717

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Risk-Adapted, Individualized Treatment Strategies of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML).

Authors:  Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.