Michaela M Hell1, Christian Schlundt2, Daniel Bittner2, Mohamed Marwan2, Stephan Achenbach2. 1. Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. Electronic address: michaela.hell@unimedizin-mainz.de. 2. Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An optimal aorto-coronary angiographic projection, characterized by an orthogonal visualization of the proximal coronary artery, is crucial for interventional success. We determined the distribution of optimal C-arm positions and assessed their feasibility by invasive coronary angiography. METHODS: Orthogonal aorto-coronary ostial angulations were determined in 310 CT data sets. In 100 patients undergoing subsequent invasive angiography, we assessed if the CT-predicted angulations were achievable by the C-arm system. If the predicted projection was not achievable due to mechanical constraints of the C-arm system, the most close, achievable angulation was determined. Patient characteristics were analyzed regarding the distribution of optimal angulations and its feasibility by the C-arm system. RESULTS: For the left ostium, CT revealed a mean angulation of LAO 23 ± 21°/cranial 25 ± 23° (90% of patients with a LAO/cranial angulation, 3% LAO/caudal, 4% RAO/cranial, 3% RAO/caudal) and were achievable by the C-arm system in 87% of patients. For the right ostium, the mean CT-predicted orthogonal angulation was LAO 36 ± 37°/cranial 36 ± 51° (84% LAO/cranial, 2% LAO/caudal, 14% RAO/caudal) and achievable by the C-arm system in 45% of patients. For the left ostium, a higher body weight was associated with a steeper LAO/cranial angulation being less feasible by the C-arm system due to mechanical constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Orthogonal aorto-left coronary angulations show a relative narrow distribution predominately in LAO/cranial position whereas a wider range of angulations was found for the right coronary ostium. The feasibility of CT-predicted angulations by the C-arm system is more restricted for the right than the left coronary ostium.
BACKGROUND: An optimal aorto-coronary angiographic projection, characterized by an orthogonal visualization of the proximal coronary artery, is crucial for interventional success. We determined the distribution of optimal C-arm positions and assessed their feasibility by invasive coronary angiography. METHODS: Orthogonal aorto-coronary ostial angulations were determined in 310 CT data sets. In 100 patients undergoing subsequent invasive angiography, we assessed if the CT-predicted angulations were achievable by the C-arm system. If the predicted projection was not achievable due to mechanical constraints of the C-arm system, the most close, achievable angulation was determined. Patient characteristics were analyzed regarding the distribution of optimal angulations and its feasibility by the C-arm system. RESULTS: For the left ostium, CT revealed a mean angulation of LAO 23 ± 21°/cranial 25 ± 23° (90% of patients with a LAO/cranial angulation, 3% LAO/caudal, 4% RAO/cranial, 3% RAO/caudal) and were achievable by the C-arm system in 87% of patients. For the right ostium, the mean CT-predicted orthogonal angulation was LAO 36 ± 37°/cranial 36 ± 51° (84% LAO/cranial, 2% LAO/caudal, 14% RAO/caudal) and achievable by the C-arm system in 45% of patients. For the left ostium, a higher body weight was associated with a steeper LAO/cranial angulation being less feasible by the C-arm system due to mechanical constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Orthogonal aorto-left coronary angulations show a relative narrow distribution predominately in LAO/cranial position whereas a wider range of angulations was found for the right coronary ostium. The feasibility of CT-predicted angulations by the C-arm system is more restricted for the right than the left coronary ostium.
Authors: Yuhe Sheng; Jie Yu; Quanmin Jing; Yaling Han; Yi Li; Kai Xu; Miaohan Qiu; Yingdong Wang; Gary S Mintz; Bin Wang Journal: J Interv Cardiol Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 2.279