Literature DB >> 33349463

COVID-19-negative psychiatric units: Mitigating sequelae of pandemic isolation.

Katrina Brody Kostro1, Liliya Gershengoren2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33349463      PMCID: PMC7834021          DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry        ISSN: 0163-8343            Impact factor:   3.238


× No keyword cloud information.
Research Letter to the Editor: We are writing to call attention to the profound psychological/physiological stress caused by the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. As second waves are on the rise, U.S. total death rates related to COVID-19 are greater than 270,000, and above 1.5 million worldwide [1]. While public health guidelines continue to advise social distancing to prevent further spread of the virus, this very distancing increases pandemic-induced isolation, fear of infection, and fear of death [[2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]]. Extended periods of social isolation have led to disruption of daily routines, separation from loved ones, and perceived loss of autonomy. The subsequent distress has been labeled a “parallel epidemic,” [8] and an unprecedented “shock to humanity's fabric,” [7] rife with anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and suicidal ideations [[2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]]. Although medical literature has focused on COVID-19-positive individuals, there has been sparse discussion regarding COVID-19-negative individuals, specifically in the inpatient psychiatric setting. While the effects of isolation for COVID-infected patients are devastating, COVID-negative patients, too, require consideration regarding access to treatment. Given the decrease of in-person outpatient treatment, patients may be lost to follow up, leading to psychiatric decompensation requiring hospital admission [7]. We propose four different practices, indications, and key features (Table 1 ), through which we encourage COVID-19-negative psychiatric units to implement social support, trauma-guided principles, review of current events, and psychoeducation on telemedicine. The unique setting of COVID-negative psychiatric units may serve as a way to mitigate pandemic-associated psychopathology during a time of crisis, and help prepare patients for outpatient follow up care in the ongoing uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Table 1

Recommendations for COVID-19-negative psychiatric units.

Recommendations for COVID-19-negative psychiatric units: mitigating sequelae of pandemic isolation
PracticeIndicationKey features
Socially distanced supportSocial support is a protective factor

Frequent COVID-19 symptom screening & masks required for patients & staff

Group dining w/ physically-distanced seating

More patient group times (eg. AM / PM groups) to allow for maximum participation with physical distancing

Trauma-guided principlesCOVID-19 pandemic may be experienced as a trauma

Directly ask patients about COVID-19-related loss

Psychoeducation on adaptive coping mechanisms

Trauma-focused therapy: exposure-based, cognitive restructuring ⟶ reduce post-traumatic stress severity

COVID-19 current events groupsPlethora of COVID-19 pandemic (mis)information

Facilitate structured groups to discuss & synthesize COVID-19 news

Review pathophysiology basics & public health guidelines

Address ethnic, racial, socioeconomic disparities of COVID-19

Link to virtual supportPatients may be ambivalent about telehealth

Education about benefits of telemedicine

Technical assistance w/ virtual resources

Tablets/computers w/ HIPAA-compliant video capabilities for family meetings/visits

Recommendations for COVID-19-negative psychiatric units. Frequent COVID-19 symptom screening & masks required for patients & staff Group dining w/ physically-distanced seating More patient group times (eg. AM / PM groups) to allow for maximum participation with physical distancing Directly ask patients about COVID-19-related loss Psychoeducation on adaptive coping mechanisms Trauma-focused therapy: exposure-based, cognitive restructuring ⟶ reduce post-traumatic stress severity Facilitate structured groups to discuss & synthesize COVID-19 news Review pathophysiology basics & public health guidelines Address ethnic, racial, socioeconomic disparities of COVID-19 Education about benefits of telemedicine Technical assistance w/ virtual resources Tablets/computers w/ HIPAA-compliant video capabilities for family meetings/visits

Socially-distanced support

From community dining, to group therapy, and milieu intermingling, psychiatric units foster socialization, which mediates negative effects of isolation. However, COVID-negative units must cultivate socially-distanced support in accordance with current public health guidelines. Patients and staff should wear masks, adhere to hand hygiene, and undergo frequent COVID-19 symptom screening [9]. Patients should be placed in single rather than shared bedrooms whenever possible. Meanwhile, patient groups, which are a vital component of inpatient treatment, should be continued. Physical distancing can be maintained by limiting group attendance, or double-scheduling, to allow different patients to attend on different days/times. Group dining, in lieu of patients eating alone in their rooms, can continue by staggering meal times, and urging masks-on immediately whenever not eating/drinking. We acknowledge that group settings during a pandemic, and hospitalization itself, are not zero-risk. However, if risk is minimized with masks, physically-distanced seating, and symptom screening, we argue the benefits of socialization on COVID-negative units outweigh the risks of isolation, which may have precipitated psychiatric decompensation leading to admission in the first place.

Trauma-guided principles

The COVID-19 pandemic and the “parallel epidemic” of psychological stress may be experienced as a trauma, especially for patients with pre-existing psychiatric comorbidities. In the face of trauma, patients may develop maladaptive coping mechanisms such as increased substance use, and may be at increased risk for self-harm [3]. Providers should be attuned to pandemic-related trauma, and should directly ask patients about their exposure and/or loss related to COVID-19. Trauma-focused therapy, which uses exposure-based interventions and cognitive restructuring, may be effective in reducing post-traumatic stress, especially if used as an early intervention [3]. Inpatient units can utilize trauma-guided principles in individual therapy and in dedicated groups.

COVID-19 current events groups

The influx of information from public health authorities, news broadcasting, and social media, is in itself a significant stressor, especially for individuals with serious mental illness [4,5]. Patients would benefit from current events groups to review COVID-19 basics including symptoms, spread and prevention, and public health guidelines. Ethnic, racial, and socioeconomic disparities of COVID-19 should also be addressed. These groups would provide patients the opportunity to ask questions and correct potential misconceptions about the COVID-19 pandemic.

Link to virtual support

In the COVID-19 era of social distancing, virtual communication is critical, and telemedicine has become an indispensable method of care. Given strict limitations on hospital visitors [4], HIPAA-compliant video devices should be available to patients for virtual visits with loved ones and for family meetings, often a crucial component of discharge planning. Furthermore, regarding telemedicine, we have heard numerous patients say, “that's not my thing.” Providers should prepare patients for the reality of virtual treatment during the pandemic and potentially beyond. By working through and addressing ambivalence about telemedicine, individuals who might otherwise be lost to follow up in the absence of in-person appointments may more readily pursue care through telehealth after discharge. As governments and healthcare systems navigate the impact of this unprecedented pandemic, epidemiological research and evaluation of mental health interventions are essential for patients and their providers, whose relationships will continue by necessity to exist, even and especially in the face of pandemics as devastating as COVID-19.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.
  7 in total

1.  Mental Health of Communities during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Daniel Vigo; Scott Patten; Kathleen Pajer; Michael Krausz; Steven Taylor; Brian Rush; Giuseppe Raviola; Shekhar Saxena; Graham Thornicroft; Lakshmi N Yatham
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  The psychological impact of COVID-19 on the mental health in the general population.

Authors:  Gianluca Serafini; Bianca Parmigiani; Andrea Amerio; Andrea Aguglia; Leo Sher; Mario Amore
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2020-06-22

3.  Keeping the wolf at bay: Infection prevention and control measures for inpatient psychiatric facilities in the time of COVID-19.

Authors:  Brian Barnett; Frank Esper; Charles B Foster
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 3.238

Review 4.  How mental health care should change as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Carmen Moreno; Til Wykes; Silvana Galderisi; Merete Nordentoft; Nicolas Crossley; Nev Jones; Mary Cannon; Christoph U Correll; Louise Byrne; Sarah Carr; Eric Y H Chen; Philip Gorwood; Sonia Johnson; Hilkka Kärkkäinen; John H Krystal; Jimmy Lee; Jeffrey Lieberman; Carlos López-Jaramillo; Miia Männikkö; Michael R Phillips; Hiroyuki Uchida; Eduard Vieta; Antonio Vita; Celso Arango
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 27.083

5.  Epidemic psychiatry: The opportunities and challenges of COVID-19.

Authors:  Daniel Shalev; Peter A Shapiro
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.238

6.  Patients with mental health disorders in the COVID-19 epidemic.

Authors:  Hao Yao; Jian-Hua Chen; Yi-Feng Xu
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 27.083

Review 7.  The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence.

Authors:  Samantha K Brooks; Rebecca K Webster; Louise E Smith; Lisa Woodland; Simon Wessely; Neil Greenberg; Gideon James Rubin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 79.321

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.