Literature DB >> 33349378

Elderly Woman With Cough, Fever, and Dyspnea.

Oron Frenkel1, David Barbic1, Mario Francispragasm1, Derek Murray1, Jeff Yoo1, Frank X Scheuermeyer1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33349378      PMCID: PMC7362810          DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


× No keyword cloud information.
A 91-year-old woman with emphysema, heart failure, and remote coronary artery bypass grafting attended the emergency department (ED) with cough, fever, and dyspnea for 3 days. She lived with her son, who had recently tested positive for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). On examination, she had normal mentation, a temperature of 38.8°C (101.8°F), a pulse rate of 110 beats/min, a respiratory rate of 28 breaths/min, and oxygen levels of 91% on room air. On auscultation, she had bilateral coarse inspiratory crackles. The emergency physician performed bedside lung ultrasonography; the most prominent findings were in the right upper posterior lung zone (Figure 1 , Video 1) and left lower posterior zone (Figure 2 , Video 2). Then the physician obtained a confirmatory chest radiograph (Figure 3 ).
Figure 1

Lung ultrasonography of the right upper posterior zone, demonstrating thickened irregular pleural line (short arrow) and B lines (long arrows). The emergency physician used a curvilinear probe (Sonosite C-60, 5 to 2 MHz; Sonosite, Bothell, WA) with a horizontal probe orientation with multibeam and tissue harmonic imaging presets off. The physician used the 12-zone technique. The most noteworthy findings were in the right upper posterior zone and the left lower posterior zone.

Figure 2

Lung ultrasonography of the left lower posterior zone, demonstrating skip lesion of subpleural consolidation (vertical arrow) but minimal pleural discontinuity. Also note the B line (bracket) with A lines (short arrow) denoting surrounding normal lung tissue. Probe setting same as above.

Figure 3

Chest radiography showing interstitial infiltrate.

Lung ultrasonography of the right upper posterior zone, demonstrating thickened irregular pleural line (short arrow) and B lines (long arrows). The emergency physician used a curvilinear probe (Sonosite C-60, 5 to 2 MHz; Sonosite, Bothell, WA) with a horizontal probe orientation with multibeam and tissue harmonic imaging presets off. The physician used the 12-zone technique. The most noteworthy findings were in the right upper posterior zone and the left lower posterior zone. Lung ultrasonography of the left lower posterior zone, demonstrating skip lesion of subpleural consolidation (vertical arrow) but minimal pleural discontinuity. Also note the B line (bracket) with A lines (short arrow) denoting surrounding normal lung tissue. Probe setting same as above. Chest radiography showing interstitial infiltrate.

Diagnosis

COVID-19 lung infection. The flocked nasopharyngeal swab demonstrated a positive test result (Cobas Roche 6800 reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction; Roche Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) within 6 hours. Ultrasonography is a rapid, repeatable test that minimizes patient transfer and infection concerns. Key features include a thickened, irregular pleural line, “skip” lesions caused by subpleural effusions, and B lines caused by thickened subpleural septa.2, 3, 4, 5, 6 There are no unique ultrasonographic findings in COVID-19, and comorbidities (eg, heart failure) may have similar appearance; as such, the optimal ED utility remains unclear. , However, bilateral B lines appear to be one of the strongest clinical predictors of COVID-19 in undifferentiated ED patients, and ultrasonographic findings appear correlated with computed tomographic findings in ill patients.
  6 in total

1.  Bedside ultrasound assessment of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced lung recruitment.

Authors:  Belaïd Bouhemad; Hélène Brisson; Morgan Le-Guen; Charlotte Arbelot; Qin Lu; Jean-Jacques Rouby
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Lung Ultrasound for COVID-19 Evaluation in the Emergency Department: Is It Feasible?

Authors:  Jon Wolfshohl; Andrew Shedd; Eric H Chou; James P d'Etienne
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Can Lung US Help Critical Care Clinicians in the Early Diagnosis of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pneumonia?

Authors:  Erika Poggiali; Alessandro Dacrema; Davide Bastoni; Valentina Tinelli; Elena Demichele; Pau Mateo Ramos; Teodoro Marcianò; Matteo Silva; Andrea Vercelli; Andrea Magnacavallo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  A Brief Review of Lung Ultrasonography in COVID-19: Is It Useful?

Authors:  Matthew J Fiala
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Accuracy of Emergency Department Clinical Findings for Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Authors:  Olivier Peyrony; Carole Marbeuf-Gueye; Vy Truong; Marion Giroud; Clémentine Rivière; Khalil Khenissi; Léa Legay; Marie Simonetta; Arben Elezi; Alessandra Principe; Pierre Taboulet; Carl Ogereau; Mathieu Tourdjman; Sami Ellouze; Jean-Paul Fontaine
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Findings of lung ultrasonography of novel corona virus pneumonia during the 2019-2020 epidemic.

Authors:  Qian-Yi Peng; Xiao-Ting Wang; Li-Na Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 17.440

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.