Adweeti Nepal1, Santa Kumar Dangol2, Anke van der Kwaak3. 1. Save the Children, Surkhet, Karnali Province, Nepal. anepal7@gmail.com. 2. CARE International, Nepal, P.O Box 1611, 4/288- SAMATA Bhawan-Dhobighat, Lalitpur, Nepal. 3. Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), Mauritskade 64, 1092, AD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The persistent quality gap in maternal health services in Nepal has resulted in poor maternal health outcomes. Accordingly, the Government of Nepal (GoN) has placed emphasis on responsive and accountable maternal health services and initiated social accountability interventions as a strategical approach simultaneously. This review critically explores the social accountability interventions in maternal health services in Nepal and its outcomes by analyzing existing evidence to contribute to the informed policy formulation process. METHODS: A literature review and desk study undertaken between December 2018 and May 2019. An adapted framework of social accountability by Lodenstein et al. was used for critical analysis of the existing literature between January 2000 and May 2019 from Nepal and other low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) that have similar operational context to Nepal. The literature was searched and extracted from database such as PubMed and ScienceDirect, and web search engines such as Google Scholar using defined keywords. RESULTS: The study found various social accountability interventions that have been initiated by GoN and external development partners in maternal health services in Nepal. Evidence from Nepal and other LMICs showed that the social accountability interventions improved the quality of maternal health services by improving health system responsiveness, enhancing community ownership, addressing inequalities and enabling the community to influence the policy decision-making process. Strong gender norms, caste-hierarchy system, socio-political and economic context and weak enforceability mechanism in the health system are found to be the major contextual factors influencing community engagement in social accountability interventions in Nepal. CONCLUSIONS: Social accountability interventions have potential to improve the quality of maternal health services in Nepal. The critical factor for successful outcomes in maternal health services is quality implementation of interventions. Similarly, continuous effort is needed from policymakers to strengthen monitoring and regulatory mechanism of the health system and decentralization process, to improve access to the information and to establish proper complaints and feedback system from the community to ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of the interventions. Furthermore, more study needs to be conducted to evaluate the impact of the existing social accountability interventions in improving maternal health services in Nepal.
BACKGROUND: The persistent quality gap in maternal health services in Nepal has resulted in poor maternal health outcomes. Accordingly, the Government of Nepal (GoN) has placed emphasis on responsive and accountable maternal health services and initiated social accountability interventions as a strategical approach simultaneously. This review critically explores the social accountability interventions in maternal health services in Nepal and its outcomes by analyzing existing evidence to contribute to the informed policy formulation process. METHODS: A literature review and desk study undertaken between December 2018 and May 2019. An adapted framework of social accountability by Lodenstein et al. was used for critical analysis of the existing literature between January 2000 and May 2019 from Nepal and other low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) that have similar operational context to Nepal. The literature was searched and extracted from database such as PubMed and ScienceDirect, and web search engines such as Google Scholar using defined keywords. RESULTS: The study found various social accountability interventions that have been initiated by GoN and external development partners in maternal health services in Nepal. Evidence from Nepal and other LMICs showed that the social accountability interventions improved the quality of maternal health services by improving health system responsiveness, enhancing community ownership, addressing inequalities and enabling the community to influence the policy decision-making process. Strong gender norms, caste-hierarchy system, socio-political and economic context and weak enforceability mechanism in the health system are found to be the major contextual factors influencing community engagement in social accountability interventions in Nepal. CONCLUSIONS: Social accountability interventions have potential to improve the quality of maternal health services in Nepal. The critical factor for successful outcomes in maternal health services is quality implementation of interventions. Similarly, continuous effort is needed from policymakers to strengthen monitoring and regulatory mechanism of the health system and decentralization process, to improve access to the information and to establish proper complaints and feedback system from the community to ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of the interventions. Furthermore, more study needs to be conducted to evaluate the impact of the existing social accountability interventions in improving maternal health services in Nepal.
Entities:
Keywords:
Community participation; Health system; Maternal health services; Quality of care; Responsiveness; Social accountability
Authors: Elsbet Lodenstein; Marjolein Dieleman; Barend Gerretsen; Jacqueline E W Broerse Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2016-07-03 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Sara Gullo; Christine Galavotti; Anne Sebert Kuhlmann; Thumbiko Msiska; Phil Hastings; C Nathan Marti Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mukesh Hamal; Kalina Heiter; Lian Schoenmakers; Myonne Smid; Tjard de Cock Buning; Vincent De Brouwere; Azucena Bardají; Chiranjibi Nepal; Marjolein Dieleman Journal: Int J Health Policy Manag Date: 2019-05-01
Authors: Eric M Mafuta; Marjolein A Dieleman; Lisanne M Hogema; Paul N Khomba; François M Zioko; Patrick K Kayembe; Tjard de Cock Buning; Thérèse N M Mambu Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Todd P Lewis; Amit Aryal; Suresh Mehata; Astha Thapa; Aisha K Yousafzai; Margaret E Kruk Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2022-08-01 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Dilaram Acharya; Salila Gautam; Thomas G Poder; Antoine Lewin; Amaury Gaussen; Kwan Lee; Jitendra Kumar Singh Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-09-15