BACKGROUND: Researchers had contradictory conclusions about the role of probiotics in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), which has led to the controversial use of probiotics in mechanically ventilated patients. OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy and safety of probiotics in preventing VAP. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in 7 medical databases. Two investigators assessed literature quality independently and collected data. The primary outcome was the incidence of VAP. Secondary outcomes included 16 measures. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to analyze the source of heterogeneity. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant, and CIs were set at 95%. A random-effects model was set when I2 <50%, otherwise a fixed-effects model was used. RESULTS: A total of 20 randomized controlled studies with a total of 2428 patients were analyzed. Pooled results showed positive effects of probiotics on the reduction of VAP incidence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.672; P < 0.001; I2 = 11.3%), length of ICU stay (WMD = -1.417; P = 0.012; I2 = 90.7%), oropharyngeal (RR = 0.866; P = 0.031; I2 = 12.4%) and gastric (RR = 0.645; P < 0.001; I2 = 30.2%) colonization. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Probiotics can reduce the incidence of VAP and reduce oropharyngeal and gastric bacterial colonization. The results also suggest that probiotics do not cause adverse effects.
BACKGROUND: Researchers had contradictory conclusions about the role of probiotics in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), which has led to the controversial use of probiotics in mechanically ventilated patients. OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy and safety of probiotics in preventing VAP. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in 7 medical databases. Two investigators assessed literature quality independently and collected data. The primary outcome was the incidence of VAP. Secondary outcomes included 16 measures. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to analyze the source of heterogeneity. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant, and CIs were set at 95%. A random-effects model was set when I2 <50%, otherwise a fixed-effects model was used. RESULTS: A total of 20 randomized controlled studies with a total of 2428 patients were analyzed. Pooled results showed positive effects of probiotics on the reduction of VAP incidence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.672; P < 0.001; I2 = 11.3%), length of ICU stay (WMD = -1.417; P = 0.012; I2 = 90.7%), oropharyngeal (RR = 0.866; P = 0.031; I2 = 12.4%) and gastric (RR = 0.645; P < 0.001; I2 = 30.2%) colonization. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Probiotics can reduce the incidence of VAP and reduce oropharyngeal and gastric bacterial colonization. The results also suggest that probiotics do not cause adverse effects.