Literature DB >> 33348763

Gender Differences in Subjective Pain Perception during and after Tattooing.

Joanna Witkoś1, Magdalena Hartman-Petrycka2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the research was to analyse the impact of gender on pain perception during and directly after tattooing, with the following predictors as covariates: the body area chosen for a tattoo, the character of the pain, the time it takes to complete the tattoo, bleeding, the level of stress, analgesics taken before the tattooing procedure, and the cycle phase.
METHODS: A total of 1092 participants took part in this study (F: 863, M: 229). A proprietary survey was used in the research, including patient characteristics and questions relating to the above-mentioned variables. Multiple regression analyses were used for continuous outcomes and multiple logistic regression analyses for binary outcomes.
RESULTS: Factors increasing pain during tattooing include: time B: 0.35; 95% CIs: 0.27-0.43; p = 0.001; bleeding B: 0.36; 95% CIs: 0.00-0.72; p = 0.052; level of stress B: 0.45; 95% CIs: 0.31-0.60; p = 0.001; pain medications taken before tattooing B: 1.42; 95% CIs: 0.60-2.23; p = 0.001. Factors increasing pain after tattooing include: time B: 0.21; 95% CIs: 0.15-0.27; p = 0.001; bleeding B: 0.47; 95% CIs: 0.20-0.72; p = 0.001; level of stress B: 0.15; 95% CIs: 0.04-0.26; p = 0.001.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference between females and males in pain intensity during tattooing. Directly after the procedure, however, pain intensity was higher in women when compared to men. The most important factors increasing pain were time, bleeding, and the level of stress.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bleeding; gender differences; level of stress; pain; tattoo; time of tattooing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33348763      PMCID: PMC7767267          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  30 in total

Review 1.  Sex-related hormonal influences on pain and analgesic responses.

Authors:  R B Fillingim; T J Ness
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 2.  Applying hypnosis in dermatology.

Authors:  Philip D Shenefelt
Journal:  Dermatol Nurs       Date:  2003-12

3.  Prevalence of tattooing and body piercing in Germany and perception of health, mental disorders, and sensation seeking among tattooed and body-pierced individuals.

Authors:  Aglaja Stirn; Andreas Hinz; Elmar Brähler
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 4.  Sex hormones, central nervous system and pain.

Authors:  Anna Maria Aloisi; Marco Bonifazi
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 3.587

5.  SEX DIFFERENCES IN RESPONSE TO EXPERIMENTALLY INDUCED PAIN.

Authors:  M Apkhazava; I Kvachadze; М Tsagareli; M Chakhnashvili
Journal:  Georgian Med News       Date:  2019-02

6.  Sensory changes during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle in healthy women.

Authors:  P Bajaj; L Arendt-Nielsen; P Bajaj; H Madsen
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 7.  Modulation of pain by estrogens.

Authors:  Rebecca M Craft
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 8.  Sex Differences in Pain.

Authors:  Robert E Sorge; Stacie K Totsch
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 9.  Hypnosis for Acute Procedural Pain: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Cassie Kendrick; Jim Sliwinski; Yimin Yu; Aimee Johnson; William Fisher; Zoltán Kekecs; Gary Elkins
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  2016

10.  Tattooing and body piercing--what motivates you to do it?

Authors:  Bogusław Antoszewski; Aneta Sitek; Marta Fijałkowska; Anna Kasielska; Julia Kruk-Jeromin
Journal:  Int J Soc Psychiatry       Date:  2009-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.