M Victoria Cerezo1, María J Blanca1, Marta Ferragut1. 1. Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Behavioral Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Malaga, Campus Universitario de Teatinos, s/n, 29071 Malaga, Spain.
Abstract
Dispositional personality characteristics may play a role in psychosocial adjustment to any disease, including cancer. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify personality profiles in breast cancer patients and to determine whether these profiles are associated with psychological adjustment or psychopathology. METHODS: Participants were 109 women (mean age, 52.01) diagnosed with breast cancer. They completed the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III), the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), the Satisfaction with Life Scale, and the Positive and Negative Affect Scales. RESULTS: The analysis revealed two different personality profiles: (a) one group, comprising 38.23% of the sample, was characterized by paranoid, negativistic, and dependent personality traits and was considered as a "vulnerable group"; and (b) another group (61.77%) was characterized by compulsive, histrionic, and narcissistic personality traits and was considered as a "psychologically adjusted group". The vulnerable group scored higher than the psychologically adjusted group on all clinical syndromes, with scores above 60 on the anxiety, somatoform, dysthymic, and bipolar scales (score on anxiety being above 75); in contrast, the psychologically adjusted group did not reach a base rate score of 60 on any of the clinical syndromes, showing no manifestations of psychopathology. Additionally, the vulnerable group scored lower than the psychologically adjusted group on optimism, life satisfaction, and positive affect, but higher on negative affect. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that personality traits could affect the psychological adjustment of breast cancer survivors. We discuss the implications of belonging to each group and highlight the importance of early identification of vulnerable women in order to facilitate clinical and psychological support.
Dispositional personality characteristics may play a role in psychosocial adjustment to any disease, including cancer. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify personality profiles in breast cancerpatients and to determine whether these profiles are associated with psychological adjustment or psychopathology. METHODS:Participants were 109 women (mean age, 52.01) diagnosed with breast cancer. They completed the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III), the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), the Satisfaction with Life Scale, and the Positive and Negative Affect Scales. RESULTS: The analysis revealed two different personality profiles: (a) one group, comprising 38.23% of the sample, was characterized by paranoid, negativistic, and dependent personality traits and was considered as a "vulnerable group"; and (b) another group (61.77%) was characterized by compulsive, histrionic, and narcissistic personality traits and was considered as a "psychologically adjusted group". The vulnerable group scored higher than the psychologically adjusted group on all clinical syndromes, with scores above 60 on the anxiety, somatoform, dysthymic, and bipolar scales (score on anxiety being above 75); in contrast, the psychologically adjusted group did not reach a base rate score of 60 on any of the clinical syndromes, showing no manifestations of psychopathology. Additionally, the vulnerable group scored lower than the psychologically adjusted group on optimism, life satisfaction, and positive affect, but higher on negative affect. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that personality traits could affect the psychological adjustment of breast cancer survivors. We discuss the implications of belonging to each group and highlight the importance of early identification of vulnerable women in order to facilitate clinical and psychological support.
Entities:
Keywords:
MCMI; breast cancer; clinical syndromes; personality; psychological profile; well-being
Authors: Estrella Durá-Ferrandis; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Jonathan Clapp; George Luta; LeighAnne Faul; Gretchen Kimmick; Harvey Jay Cohen; Rachel L Yung; Arti Hurria Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Anna Vespa; Maria Velia Giulietti; Paolo Fabbietti; Mirko Di Rosa; Pisana Gattafoni; Riccardo Sarzani; Giorgio Arnaldi; Giancarlo Balercia; Rossana Berardi; Gianmaria Salvo; Luigi Attademo; Roberta Spatuzzi Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2022 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: David Almaraz; Jesús Saiz; Florentino Moreno Martín; Iván Sánchez-Iglesias; Antonio J Molina; Tamara L Goldsby; David H Rosmarin Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2022-06-18