Literature DB >> 33347585

Extracorporeal life support in therapy-refractory cardiocirculatory failure: looking beyond 30 days.

Sabina P W Guenther1, Roman Hornung2, Dominik Joskowiak1, Polyxeni Vlachea1, Katharina Feil3, Martin Orban4, Sven Peterss1, Frank Born1, Jörg Hausleiter4, Steffen Massberg4,5, Christian Hagl1,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Venoarterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has emerged as a potentially life-saving treatment option in therapy-refractory cardiocirculatory failure, but longer-term outcome is poorly defined. Here, we present a comprehensive follow-up analysis covering all major organ systems.
METHODS: From February 2012 to December 2016, 180 patients were treated with ECLS for therapy-refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. The 30-day survival was 43.9%, and 30-day survivors (n = 79) underwent follow-up analysis with the assessment of medium-term survival, quality of life, neuropsychological, cardiopulmonary and end-organ status.
RESULTS: After a median of 1.9 (1.1-3.6) years (182.4 patient years), 45 of the 79 patients (57.0%) were alive, 35.4% had died and 7.6% were lost to follow-up. Follow-up survival estimates were 78.0% at 1, 61.2% at 3 and 55.1% at 5 years. NYHA class at follow-up was ≤II for 83.3%. The median creatinine was 1.1 (1.0-1.4) mg/dl, and the median bilirubin was 0.8 (0.5-1.0) mg/dl. No patient required dialysis. Overall, 94.4% were free from moderate or severe disability, although 11.1% needed care. Full re-integration into social life was reported by 58.3%, and 39.4% were working. Quality of life was favourable for mental components, but a subset showed deficits in physical aspects. While age was the only peri-implantation parameter significantly predicting medium-term survival, adverse events and functional status at discharge or 30 days were strong predictors.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates positive medium-term outcome with high rates of independence in daily life and self-care but a subset of 10-20% suffered from sustained impairments. Our results indicate that peri-implantation parameters lack predictive power but downstream morbidity and functional status at discharge or 30 days can help identify patients at risk for poor recovery.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracorporeal life support; Outcome; Quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33347585      PMCID: PMC8906718          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  19 in total

1.  Health related quality of life after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in refractory cardiac arrest.

Authors:  T Spangenberg; J Schewel; A Dreher; F Meincke; E Bahlmann; H van der Schalk; F Kreidel; C Frerker; M Stoeck; B Bein; K-H Kuck; A Ghanem
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Early and late outcomes of 517 consecutive adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Ardawan Julian Rastan; Andreas Dege; Matthias Mohr; Nicolas Doll; Volkmar Falk; Thomas Walther; Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a population-based sample.

Authors:  Heidi C Rossetti; Laura H Lacritz; C Munro Cullum; Myron F Weiner
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Predicting survival after ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: the survival after veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE)-score.

Authors:  Matthieu Schmidt; Aidan Burrell; Lloyd Roberts; Michael Bailey; Jayne Sheldrake; Peter T Rycus; Carol Hodgson; Carlos Scheinkestel; D Jamie Cooper; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Daniel Brodie; Vincent Pellegrino; David Pilcher
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Comparison of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale with disability outcome measures in acute stroke trials.

Authors:  Fiona B Young; Christopher J Weir; Kennedy R Lees
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Sean van Diepen; Jason N Katz; Nancy M Albert; Timothy D Henry; Alice K Jacobs; Navin K Kapur; Ahmet Kilic; Venu Menon; E Magnus Ohman; Nancy K Sweitzer; Holger Thiele; Jeffrey B Washam; Mauricio G Cohen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Outcomes and long-term quality-of-life of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Alain Combes; Pascal Leprince; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Nicolas Bonnet; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Philippe Léger; Alain Pavie; Jean Chastre
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  The ENCOURAGE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after VA-ECMO for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Grégoire Muller; Erwan Flecher; Guillaume Lebreton; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Nicolas Bréchot; Matthieu Schmidt; Ciro Mastroianni; Jean Chastre; Pascal Leprince; Amedeo Anselmi; Alain Combes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.

Authors:  Piotr Ponikowski; Adriaan A Voors; Stefan D Anker; Héctor Bueno; John G F Cleland; Andrew J S Coats; Volkmar Falk; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Ewa A Jankowska; Mariell Jessup; Cecilia Linde; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John T Parissis; Burkert Pieske; Jillian P Riley; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Luis M Ruilope; Frank Ruschitzka; Frans H Rutten; Peter van der Meer
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Early Prediction of 3-month Survival of Patients in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest on Extracorporeal Life Support.

Authors:  Clément Delmas; Jean-Marie Conil; Simon Sztajnic; Bernard Georges; Caroline Biendel; Camille Dambrin; Michel Galinier; Vincent Minville; Olivier Fourcade; Stein Silva; Bertrand Marcheix
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  The quality of afterlife: surviving extracorporeal life support after therapy-refractory circulatory failure-a comprehensive follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Benjamin Immohr; Sophie Margaretha Eschlböck; Philipp Rellecke; Hannan Dalyanoglu; Igor Tudorache; Udo Boeken; Payam Akhyari; Alexander Albert; Artur Lichtenberg; Hug Aubin
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-09-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.