Stefan Janik1, Stefan Grasl1, Erdem Yildiz1, Gerold Besser1, Jonathan Kliman1, Philipp Hacker1, Florian Frommlet2, Alexandra Fochtmann-Frana3, Boban M Erovic4. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 2. Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 3. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 4. Institute of Head and Neck Diseases, Evangelical Hospital Vienna, Hans-Sachs Gasse 10-12, Vienna, Austria. b.erovic@ekhwien.at.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of tracheostomy on complications, dysphagia and outcome in second and third degree burned patients. METHODS: Inpatient mortality, dysphagia, severity of burn injury (ABSI, TBSA) and complications in tracheotomized burn patients were compared to (I) non-tracheotomized burn patients and (II) matched tracheotomized non-burn patients. RESULTS: 134 (30.9%) out of 433 patients who underwent tracheostomy, had a significantly higher percentage of inhalation injury (26.1% vs. 7.0%; p < 0.001), higher ABSI (8.9 ± 2.1 vs. 6.0 ± 2.7; p < 0.001) and TBSA score (41.4 ± 19.7% vs. 18.6 ± 18.8%; p < 0.001) compared to 299 non-tracheotomized burn patients. However, complications occurred equally in tracheotomized burn patients and matched controls and tracheostomy was neither linked to dysphagia nor to inpatient mortality at multivariate analysis. In particular, dysphagia occurred in 6.2% of cases and was significantly linked to length of ICU stay (OR 6.2; p = 0.021), preexisting neurocognitive impairments (OR 5.2; p = 0.001) and patients' age (OR 3.4; p = 0.046). A nomogram was calculated based on age, TBSA and inhalation injury predicting the need for a tracheostomy in severely burned patients. CONCLUSION: Using the new nomogram we were able to predict with significantly higher accuracy the need for tracheostomy in severely burned patients. Moreover, tracheostomy is safe and is not associated with higher incidenc of complications, dysphagia or worse outcome.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of tracheostomy on complications, dysphagia and outcome in second and third degree burned patients. METHODS: Inpatient mortality, dysphagia, severity of burn injury (ABSI, TBSA) and complications in tracheotomized burn patients were compared to (I) non-tracheotomized burn patients and (II) matched tracheotomized non-burn patients. RESULTS: 134 (30.9%) out of 433 patients who underwent tracheostomy, had a significantly higher percentage of inhalation injury (26.1% vs. 7.0%; p < 0.001), higher ABSI (8.9 ± 2.1 vs. 6.0 ± 2.7; p < 0.001) and TBSA score (41.4 ± 19.7% vs. 18.6 ± 18.8%; p < 0.001) compared to 299 non-tracheotomized burn patients. However, complications occurred equally in tracheotomized burn patients and matched controls and tracheostomy was neither linked to dysphagia nor to inpatient mortality at multivariate analysis. In particular, dysphagia occurred in 6.2% of cases and was significantly linked to length of ICU stay (OR 6.2; p = 0.021), preexisting neurocognitive impairments (OR 5.2; p = 0.001) and patients' age (OR 3.4; p = 0.046). A nomogram was calculated based on age, TBSA and inhalation injury predicting the need for a tracheostomy in severely burned patients. CONCLUSION: Using the new nomogram we were able to predict with significantly higher accuracy the need for tracheostomy in severely burned patients. Moreover, tracheostomy is safe and is not associated with higher incidenc of complications, dysphagia or worse outcome.
Authors: Orazio Stefano Giovanni Filippelli; Anna Maria Giglio; Simona Paola Tiburzi; Maria Teresa Archinà; Ercole Barozzi; Pietro Maglio; Stefano Candido; Roberta Viotti; Umberto Riccelli; Mario Pezzi; Carmelo Romano; Anna Maria Scozzafava; Maria Laura Guzzo Journal: Case Rep Emerg Med Date: 2021-07-01