Literature DB >> 33346718

Heritable Human Genome Editing: The Public Engagement Imperative.

Eli Y Adashi1, Michael M Burgess2, Simon Burall3, I Glenn Cohen4, Leonard M Fleck5, John Harris6, Soren Holm7, Cristina Lafont8, Jonathan D Moreno9, Michael A Neblo10, Simon J Niemeyer11, Eugene J Rowe12, Dietram A Scheufele13, Paul F Tetsa14, Effy Vayena15, Richard P Watermeyer16, Archon Fung17.   

Abstract

In the view of many, heritable human genome editing (HHGE) harbors the remedial potential of ridding the world of deadly genetic diseases. A Hippocratic obligation, if there ever was one, HHGE is widely viewed as a life-sustaining proposition. The national go/no-go decision regarding the implementation of HHGE, however, must not, in the collective view of the authors, proceed absent thorough public engagement. A comparable call for an "extensive societal dialogue" was recently issued by the International Commission on the Clinical Use of Human Germline Genome Editing. In this communication, the authors lay out the foundational principles undergirding the formation, modification, and evaluation of public opinion. It is against this backdrop that the societal decision to warrant or enjoin the clinical conduct of HHGE will doubtlessly transpire.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33346718     DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2020.0049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CRISPR J        ISSN: 2573-1599


  2 in total

1.  Who will oversee the ethical limits of human embryo research?

Authors:  Eli Y Adashi; I Glenn Cohen
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  A virtual deliberative public engagement study on heritable genome editing among South Africans: Study protocol.

Authors:  Donrich Thaldar; Beverley Townsend; Marietjie Botes; Bonginkosi Shozi; Siddharthiya Pillay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.