| Literature DB >> 33345695 |
Kenneth Ejike Ogbonna1,2, Chidozie Victor Agu3, Christopher Chukwudi Okonkwo4, Kingsley Tochukwu Ughamba1,5, Joseph Akor1,2, Obioma U Njoku2.
Abstract
In this study, we explored the possibility of utilizing the succulent pulp of Spondias mombin (SM) as feedstock for the synthesis of biosurfactants by Pseudomonas spp. The cultures were composed of basic mineral medium amended with SM, SM + glucose, glucose (GLC), and nutrient broth (NB) as carbon sources. Biosurfactant production was determined by surface-active properties such as hemolysis, emulsification index (E24), drop collapse, oil-spreading assays, and reduction of surface tension. The stability of the biosurfactants was monitored across different temperature and pH regimes while chemical components of the extracted biosurfactants were determined by thin-layer chromatography. Biosurfactants synthesized from SM as sole substrate showed the highest emulsification index (56.35%), oil-spreading capacity (4.4 ± 1.31 cm), hemolysis (3.10 ± 0.02 cm), the shortest time for drop collapse (30 s), and surface tension reduction (24 mN/m). Biosurfactant concentrations ranged from 0.07 ± 0.01 in the NB to 2.08 ± 0.01 g/L in the media amended with SM. Chemical characterization revealed significant concentrations of carbohydrates and lipids in the biosurfactant produced from SM (1.2 ± 0.17 and 0.88 ± 0.04 g/L, respectively) when compared to SM + glucose (0.92 ± 0.05, and 0.62 ± 0.02 g/L, respectively), glucose (0.35 ± 0.04 and 0.13 ± 0.02 g/L, respectively), and nutrient broth (0.06 ± 0.03 and 0.01 ± 0.01 g/L, respectively). The biosurfactants were stable over a wide range of temperature while E24 increased with pH. Our results show the viability of SM fruit pulp as low-cost feedstock for industrial-scale production of biosurfactants using Pseudomonas spp.Entities:
Keywords: Pseudomonas spp; spondias mombin ; Biosurfactants; emulsification index
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33345695 PMCID: PMC8806352 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2020.1853391
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Phytochemical and proximate composition of Spondias mombin pulp extract
| Phytochemicals | Abundance | Proximate parameter | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alkaloids | + | Moisture | 88.48 |
| Flavonoids | ++ | Proteins | 1.40 |
| Glycosides | +++ | Fats | 2.54 |
| Proteins | ++ | Fiber | 0.67 |
| Carbohydrates | +++ | Ash | 1.59 |
| Saponins | + | Carbohydrate | 5.30 |
| Steroids | ++ | ||
| Reducing sugars | +++ | ||
| Tannins | - | ||
| Terpenoids | - |
Key: +++ present in high amount, ++ present in moderate amount, + present in low amount,- absent.
Figure 1.The growth pattern of Pseudomonas species in the different media
The concentration of biosurfactants in different media
| Carbon source | Biosurfactants (g/L) |
|---|---|
| BMM+SM | 2.08 ± 0.01a |
| BMM+SM+GLC | 1.54 ± 0.02b |
| BMM+GLC | 0.48 ± 0.04 c |
| BMM+NB | 0.07 ± 0.01d |
| BMM | 0.00 |
BMM = Basal mineral medium; SM = Spondias mombin pulp extract.
a,b,c,dFisher’s LSD pairwise Values with different letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.
Comparison of biosurfactants activities among carbon sources in hemolytic, drop collapse, oil spreading, and surface tension reduction tests
| Carbon source | Hemolytic test (cm) | Drop assay | Time of collapse (s) | Oil spreading test (cm) | Surface tension measurement (mN/m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM | 3.10 ± 0.02a | +++ | 30 | 4.4 ± 1.31a | 24 ± 0.02a |
| SM+GLC | 2.51 ± 0.02b | ++ | 60 | 2.73 ± 0.06b | 27 ± 0.05b |
| GLC | 1.5 ± 0.01 c | ++ | 150 | 1.64 ± 0.05 c | 29.2 ± 0.01 c |
| NB | 0.9 ± 0.02d | + | 150 | 0.97 ± 0.05d | 32 ± 0.04d |
| Tween 80 | 3.8 ± 0.02e | +++ | 30 | 15.2 ± 0.1e | 25 ± 0.03e |
SM = Spondias mombin pulp extract.
a,b,c,d,eFisher’s LSD pairwise Values with different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. Drop collapse assay: +++ present in high amount, ++ present in moderate amount, + present in low amount.
Figure 2.The emulsification patterns on different oils using different growth media
Figure 3.Emulsification index in different growth media under different temperature regimes
Figure 4.Emulsification index in different growth media under different pH regimes
Comparison of carbohydrate and lipid concentrations among carbon sources
| Carbon source | Proteins (g/L) | Carbohydrates (g/L) | Lipids |
| SM | Not detected | 1.20 ± 0.17a | 0.88 ± 0.04a |
| SM+GLC | Not detected | 0.92 ± 0.05b | 0.62 ± 0.02b |
| GLC | Not detected | 0.35 ± 0.04 c | 0.13 ± 0.02 c |
| NB | Not detected | 0.06 ± 0.03d | 0.01 ± 0.01d |
a,b,c,dFisher’s LSD pairwise Values with different letters indicate significant difference at p < 0.05.