Literature DB >> 33345404

Venous thromboembolism incidence among patients recommended for pharmacologic thromboembolism prophylaxis after cesarean delivery in selected guidelines.

Jerome J Federspiel1,2, Lauren E Wein1, Kateena L Addae-Konadu1, Kristin C Darwin2, Laura E Talamo3, Evan R Myers4,5, Andra H James1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple guidelines regarding risk stratification for venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence following cesarean delivery have been promulgated.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the percentage of cesarean delivery patients for which pharmacologic VTE would be recommended and subsequent incidence of VTE, based on several guidelines. PATIENTS/
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database from October 2015 through December 2017. Diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify patients undergoing cesarean delivery, incidence of VTE, and risk factors used to stratify risk in the existing guidelines. Time-to-event analysis was used to analyze data, stratified by risk categorization in 2011 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), 2012 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), and 2018 American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines. RESULTS/
CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of 1 235 149 cesarean deliveries, VTE incidence was 2.1 per 1000 deliveries at 330 days following delivery (95% confidence interval: 2.0-2.2). Proportions of patients that would be recommended for pharmacologic prophylaxis ranged from 0.2% in 2018 ASH guidelines to 73.4% in 2015 RCOG criteria. Among groups considered at elevated risk for VTE for which pharmacologic prophylaxis would be recommended, VTE incidence varied from 35.2 per 1000 deliveries based on 2018 ASH criteria to 2.5 per 1000 in 2015 RCOG criteria. In a large cohort of cesarean deliveries in the United States, application of different risk stratification guidelines identified widely different proportions at risk of VTE following delivery, with implications for being categorized as having elevated risk.
© 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse effects; anticoagulation; cesarean delivery; clinical decision rules; epidemiology; venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33345404      PMCID: PMC7925427          DOI: 10.1111/jth.15218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  10 in total

1.  VTE, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Ian A Greer; Saskia Middeldorp; David L Veenstra; Anne-Marie Prabulos; Per Olav Vandvik
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Maternal mortality in the United States: predictability and the impact of protocols on fatal postcesarean pulmonary embolism and hypertension-related intracranial hemorrhage.

Authors:  Steven L Clark; James T Christmas; Donna R Frye; Janet A Meyers; Jonathan B Perlin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  A comparison of recommendations for pharmacologic thromboembolism prophylaxis after caesarean delivery from three major guidelines.

Authors:  K L Palmerola; M E D'Alton; C O Brock; A M Friedman
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Practice bulletin no. 123: thromboembolism in pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Pregnancy-Related Mortality in the United States, 2011-2013.

Authors:  Andreea A Creanga; Carla Syverson; Kristi Seed; William M Callaghan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: venous thromboembolism in the context of pregnancy.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Anita Rajasekhar; Saskia Middeldorp; Claire McLintock; Marc A Rodger; Andra H James; Sara R Vazquez; Ian A Greer; John J Riva; Meha Bhatt; Nicole Schwab; Danielle Barrett; Andrea LaHaye; Bram Rochwerg
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

7.  Trends in venous thromboembolism among pregnancy-related hospitalizations, United States, 1994-2009.

Authors:  Nafisa Ghaji; Sheree L Boulet; Naomi Tepper; William C Hooper
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Risks of Venous Thromboembolism After Cesarean Sections: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marc Blondon; Alessandro Casini; Kara K Hoppe; Françoise Boehlen; Marc Righini; Nicholas L Smith
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 196: Thromboembolism in Pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Postpartum venous thromboembolism prophylaxis may cause more harm than benefit: a critical analysis of international guidelines through an evidence-based lens.

Authors:  A Kotaska
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 6.531

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Prevention and management of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: cutting through the practice variation.

Authors:  Leslie Skeith
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

2.  Postpartum Heparin Thromboprophylaxis: More Harm Than Good.

Authors:  Andrew Kotaska
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Preventing Postpartum Venous Thromboembolism in 2022: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Marc Blondon; Leslie Skeith
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.