| Literature DB >> 33345234 |
Yulei Liu1, Laurent Lafosse2, Gaëtan Opsomer2, Benoit Villain2, Jean-Francxois Kempf3, Phillipe Collin4.
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes and tendon structural integrity after repair of isolated subscapularis (SSC) tendon tears.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; Subscapularis repair; fatty infiltration; isolated subscapularis tendon tears; long-term results; retear
Year: 2020 PMID: 33345234 PMCID: PMC7738443 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.04.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JSES Int ISSN: 2666-6383
Patients' demographic characteristics
| Data | |
|---|---|
| Age, yr | 54 ± 7.9 (39.2-66.7) |
| Sex: M/F, n | 26/9 |
| Dominant side involved | 25 (71.4) |
| Smokers | 7 (25.9) |
| Previous trauma | 16 (51.6) |
| Previous injections | 10 (34.5) |
| Profession | |
| Sedentary | 9 (25.7) |
| Light manual | 12 (34.3) |
| Heavy manual | 12 (34.3) |
| Repetitive | 2 (5.7) |
M, male; F, female.
Categorical variables are presented as number (percentage); continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (range).
Figure 1Flowchart detailing inclusion and exclusion of patients. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Postoperative assessment
| Outcome | Preoperative | Postoperative | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complications | |||
| Total | 2 (6) | ||
| Infection | 1 (3) | ||
| Frozen shoulder | 1 (3) | ||
| CS subscore, points | |||
| Pain | 6.4 ± 2.3 (2-12) | 12.5 ± 3.2 (5-15) | |
| Activity | 10.5 ± 3.3 (4-16) | 16.8 ± 4.3 (5-20) | |
| Mobility | 28.1 ± 8.8 (10-40) | 34.1 ± 5.5 (20-40) | |
| Strength | 9.9 ± 7.5 (0-25) | 12 ± 6.6 (2-24) | .05 |
| Total CS, points | 55.1 ± 18.1 (24-92) | 75.4 ± 17 (42-97) | |
| SSV | 80.9 ± 20.3 (10-100) | ||
| Sugaya classification | |||
| I | 4 (12.9) | ||
| II | 16 (51.6) | ||
| III | 7 (22.6) | ||
| IV | 2 (6.5) | ||
| V | 2 (6.5) |
CS, Constant score; SSV, Subjective Shoulder Value.
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (range) or number (percentage).
Figure 2Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of healed subscapularis tendon without fatty infiltration. (a) Subscapularis tendon with repair integrity graded as Sugaya type I. (b) Fatty infiltration of subscapularis graded at stage 1.
Figure 3Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of healed subscapularis tendon with severe fatty infiltration of subscapularis muscle. (a) Fatty infiltration of subscapularis graded as stage 4. (b) Subscapularis tendons graded as healed with Sugaya type II repair integrity.
Effect of preoperative factors on CS, SSV, and tendon healing
| Factor | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CS | SSV | Sugaya classification | |
| Age | .5 | .6 | .68 |
| Sex | .06 | .2 | .4 |
| Dominant shoulder | .85 | .88 | .26 |
| Smoking habits | .11 | .57 | .99 |
| Previous trauma | .26 | .27 | .33 |
| Injections | .65 | .09 | .15 |
| Profession | .9 | .99 | .36 |
CS, Constant score; SSV, Subjective Shoulder Value.