| Literature DB >> 33345226 |
Marco D Burkhard1,2, Michael Dietrich1, Octavian Andronic2, Nikola Nikolic3, Patrick Grueninger1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Among many advances in the treatment of rotator cuff tears, arthroscopic augmentation techniques with patches of various biological and synthetic graft materials have been introduced to reinforce the repair. However, structural and functional outcomes after patch augmentation vary, and reinforcing the tendon healing remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes 1 year after arthroscopic posterosuperior (PS) rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable patch augmentation.Entities:
Keywords: Biofiber; P4HB; Rotator cuff tear; arthroscopic repair; bioabsorbable; patch augmentation
Year: 2020 PMID: 33345226 PMCID: PMC7738590 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JSES Int ISSN: 2666-6383
Figure 1Rotator cuff tears eligible for patch augmentation. (A) Large U-shaped tear, Davidson type IIA. (B) Reversed-shape tear, Davidson type IIB. (C) Massive contracted posterosuperior tear, Davidson type III. (D) Transtendinous posterosuperior tear. (E) Supraspinatus with significant delamination with extensive fraying and retraction of the bursal layer.
Figure 2Arthroscopic images of patch-augmented rotator cuff repairs: large reversed-shape tear (A), side-to-side suture (B), and augmentation with patch (C) and large L-shaped tear with intensive fraying of superficial layer of supraspinatus tendon (D), side-to-side suture (E), and augmentation with patch (F).
Patient characteristics, tear morphology, and surgical treatment
| Variable | Data |
|---|---|
| No. of patients | 16 |
| Age, mean ± SD (range), yr | 61.2 ± 9.7 (45-76) |
| Female sex, % (n) | 25 (4) |
| PS tear pattern, % (n) | |
| Large U-shaped tear, Davidson type IIA | 25.0 (4) |
| Large L-shaped tear, Davidson type IIB | 12.5 (2) |
| Massive contracted PS tear, Davidson type III | 18.8 (3) |
| Transtendinous SSP and/or ISP tear | 31.6 (5) |
| SSP delamination with extensive superficial fraying | 62.5 (10) |
| Tear morphology, % (n) | |
| SSP tear | 93.8 (15) |
| Patte grade 1 | 31.3 (5) |
| Patte grade 2 | 43.8 (7) |
| Patte grade 3 | 18.8 (3) |
| ISP tear | 68.8 (11) |
| Patte grade 1 | 43.8 (7) |
| Patte grade 2 | 25.0 (4) |
| Patte grade 3 | 0 |
| SSC tear | 43.8 (7) |
| Lafosse grade 1 | 6.3 (1) |
| Lafosse grade 2 | 25.0 (4) |
| Lafosse grade 3 | 0 |
| Lafosse grade 4 | 12.5 (2) |
| Long biceps tendon luxation or subluxation | 43.8 (7) |
| Tendinopathy of long biceps tendon | 25.0 (4) |
| Surgical treatment, % (n) | |
| SSC treatment | 43.8 (7) |
| Biceps treatment | |
| Tenodesis | 87.5 (14) |
| Tenotomy | 0 |
| Acromioclavicular resection | 62.5 (10) |
SD, standard deviation; n, number of patients; PS, posterosuperior; SSP, supraspinatus; ISP, infraspinatus; SSC, subscapularis.
Clinical evaluation
| Variable | Preoperative | Follow-up | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 16 | 16 | |
| Strength | |||
| Modified belly-press test (0-5) | 4.0 ± 1.0 (2-5) | 4.9 ± 0.5 (3-5) | .004 |
| Jobe abduction strength test (0-5) | 2.7 ± 0.6 (1-3) | 4.8 ± 0.5 (3-5) | <.001 |
| External rotation strength (0-5) | 3.2 ± 0.5 (2-4) | 4.9 ± 0.3 (4-5) | <.001 |
| CMS | |||
| Total (maximum, 100 points) | 44.3 ± 13.8 (19-72) | 89.3 ± 11.1 (60-100) | <.001 |
| Pain (maximum, 15 points) | 6.7 ± 3.9 (0-14) | 14.3 ± 1.4 (10-15) | <.001 |
| Activity level (maximum, 10 points) | 4.6 ± 2.5 (1-8) | 9.4 ± 1.1 (6-10) | .001 |
| Painless activity (maximum, 10 points) | 6.5 ± 1.9 (4-10) | 9.6 ± 0.8 (8-10) | <.001 |
| ROM (maximum, 40 points) | 23.8 ± 7.5 (8-34) | 35.9 ± 4.9 (22-40) | <.001 |
| Strength (maximum, 25 points) | 2.8 ± 2.4 (0-6) | 20.1 ± 6.4 (4-25) | <.001 |
| Level of satisfaction | NA | 3.6 ± 0.6 (2-4) | NA |
CMS, Constant-Murley score; ROM, range of motion; NA, not available.
Data are given as mean ± standard deviation (range) unless otherwise indicated.
Statistically significant.
MRI evaluation
| Variable | Preoperative | 1-yr follow-up | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 14 | 14 | |
| Rerupture, % (n) | 6.7 (1 of 15) | NA | |
| Fatty infiltration grade (Goutallier classification) | |||
| SSC | 0.1 ± 0.4 (0-1) | 0.2 ± 0.6 (0-2) | .317 |
| SSP | 1.6 ± 1.1 (0-3) | 1.6 ± 0.7 (0-3) | >.999 |
| ISP | 0.6 ± 0.7 (0-2) | 1.3 ± 0.9 (0-3) | .011 |
| CSA, mm2 | |||
| SSC | 2110 ± 531 (1474-3221) | 2182 ± 586 (1494-3518) | .387 |
| SSP | 506 ± 170 (324-880) | 545 ± 162 (351-945) | .155 |
| ISP | 864 ± 298 (294-1358) | 885 ± 323 (315-1521) | .664 |
| Tendon integrity (Sugaya classification) | |||
| Mean | NA | 1.9 ± 0.7 (1-3) | NA |
| Grade I, % | 28.6 | NA | |
| Grade II, % | 57.1 | NA | |
| Grade III, % | 14.3 | NA |
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NA, not available; SSC, subscapularis; SSP, supraspinatus; ISP, infraspinatus; CSA, cross-sectional area.
Data are given as mean ± standard deviation (range) unless otherwise indicated. Data are presented for 14 patients; 1 patient refused to undergo postoperative MRI. Change in CSA was normally distributed, and significance was tested with the paired t test.
A retear was diagnosed on a computed tomography scan postoperatively in 1 patient. This patient did not undergo any further MRI assessments after 1 year and is not included in the total of 14 patients who underwent MRI follow-up.
Statistically significant.
Figure 3Rerupture of the rotator cuff repair occurred in 1 of 16 patients. (A, B) Preoperative paracoronal magnetic resonance imaging with transtendinous infraspinatus rupture and partial (superficial) supraspinatus rupture. (C, D) At 3 months postoperatively, a coronal radiograph and axial computed tomography scan show dislocation of 2 radiolucent lateral-row anchors with consecutive retears of the infraspinatus and posterior half of the supraspinatus tendon. ∗Fully dislocated anchor. ∗∗Partially dislocated anchor.
Figure 4(A, B) Preoperative paracoronal preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of transtendinous supraspinatus tear with extensive retraction. (C, D) Corresponding 1-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging slices show structural integrity with Sugaya grade II and a restored supraspinatus tendon thickness at the footprint.
Figure 5(A, B) Preoperative paracoronal magnetic resonance imaging preoperative with large L-shaped tear and significant fraying of superficial layer of supraspinatus. (C, D) Corresponding 1-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging with full structural integrity Sugaya I. Note that the patch is radiographically indistinguishable, representing full resorption of the patch.