| Literature DB >> 33345150 |
Maxime L'Hermette1, Ingrid Castres1, Jeremy Coquart1, Montassar Tabben2, Nihel Ghoul1, Bernard Andrieu3, Claire Tourny1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the physiological data from subjects and their reported sensory experiences during two types of recovery methods following a handball training session. Female handball players (average age: 21.4 ± 1.3 years; weight: 59.2 ± 3.3 kg; height: 158 ± 3 cm; body mass index, 23.4 ± 2.0 kg.m-2) carried out an athletic training session (rating of perceived exertion RPE: 14.70 ± 0.89) with either a passive recovery (PR) period or cold water immersion (CWI) for 14 min) (cross-over design). Physiological data were collected during the recovery period: CWI had a greater effect than PR on heart rate (HR; bpm), the higher frequencies (HF) of heart rate variability (HRV: 46.44 ± 21.50 vs. 24.12 ± 17.62), delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS: 1.37 ± 0.51 vs. 2.12 ± 1.25), and various reported emotional sensations. Spectrum HRV analysis showed a significant increase in HF during CWI. Sensorial experiences during the recovery periods were gathered from verbatim reports 24 h later. Players' comments about CWI revealed a congruence between the physiological data and sensorial reports. They used words such as: "thermal shock," "regeneration," "resourcefulness," "dynamism," and "disappearance of pain" to describe their sensations. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the link between physiological and experiential data during CWI and we propose that action of the parasympathetic system on the autonomic nervous system can, at least in part, explain the observed correlations between the corporeal data measured and the sensorial experiences reported.Entities:
Keywords: athletic recovery; cold water immersion; experiential data; handball; physiological data; sensations; verbatim reports
Year: 2020 PMID: 33345150 PMCID: PMC7739586 DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2020.581705
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Sports Act Living ISSN: 2624-9367
Figure 1Experimental procedure. RPE, Ratings of Perceived Exertion; DOMS, Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness; HRV, Heart Rate Variability; CWI, Cold Water Immersion; PR, Passive Recovery. The interview was to gather sensorial data.
Comparison heart rate variabilities (HRV) and delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) scores in female handball players following passive recovery (PR) or cold-water immersion (CWI) treatment post-exertion.
| DOMS | DOMS +16 min | 1.37 ± 0.517 | 2.12 ± 1.25 | 0.77 |
| HF | 46.44 ± 21.50 | 24.12 ± 17.62 | 1.13 | |
| LF | 53.37 ± 21.61 | 75.69 ± 17.65 | 1.13 | |
| HRV | LF/HF | 5.76 ±4.921 | 1.812 ± 1.701 | 1.07 |
| RMSSD | 3.692 ± 0.726 | 3.396 ± 0.934 | 0.35 | |
| pNN50 | 2.523 ± 1.29 | 2.2510 ± 1.37 | 0.20 |
ES, Effect size.
Levels of statistical significance are indicated where
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001.
Fatigue as measured by rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale of 6 to 20 and heart rate (HR) values (bpm) measured post-training (postT) and post-recovery (postR) of eight female handball players.
| PR | 14.5 ± 3.5 NS | 9 ± 3.4 NS | 165.29 ± 5.2 NS | 88.71 ± 13.1 NS |
| CWI | 13.5 ± 3.0 | 8.5 ± 2.7 | 165.71 ± 6.9 | 85.8 ± 9.0 |
| ES | 0.30 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.25 |
NS indicates no significant difference (p > 0.05).
PR, passive recovery; CWI, cold water immersion; ES, effect size.
Figure 2Comparison of heart rates (HR; bpm) in female handball players following passive recovery (PR) or cold-water immersion (CWI) treatment post-exertion. CWI, Cold Water Immersion; PR, Passive Recovery. Levels of statistical significance are indicated where *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3Heart rate (HR) individual's responses to training session (ts) and to cold-water immersion (CWI). S, Subjects; HRts, Mean HR of the training session; HRti, HR at initial time of immersion. HR1, HR3, HR5, HR9, HR14: HR value at 1, 3, 5, 9, and 14 min of CWI.