| Literature DB >> 33344843 |
Jie Pan1, Wenjing Meng1, Shi Li1, Jun Du1.
Abstract
Plasma-assisted combustion is a promising approach to achieve fast ignition and highly efficient combustion. In this work, methane-air nanosecond pulsed dielectric barrier discharge plasma-assisted combustion is numerically investigated by combining a homemade plasma model with the combustion model of software CHEMKIN-PRO. Effects of varying applied voltage amplitudes on the characteristic parameters of the plasma-assisted planar shear flow combustion as well as the reaction pathway maps of not only the nanosecond pulsed dielectric barrier discharge plasma but also the combustions without and with plasma assistance are systematically illustrated and analyzed. The simulation results indicate that under the combined action of increasing electric field intensity and increasing charged particle densities, the peak value of the discharge current density increases, and the peak time of the discharge current density is brought forward with the increase of the applied voltage amplitude. The temperature reaches its peak value earlier in the methane-air combustion with plasma assistance than without plasma assistance. The maximum temperature reduces to around 1900 K when the applied voltage amplitude is higher than 11 kV. There are emerging pathways to generate hydrocarbons C2H4 and C2H2 in the plasma-assisted combustion, the reactions of CH4 on CH and C2H on H2, respectively. The reactions involving active species such as H play a significant role in the plasma-assisted combustion, which causes an obvious decrease in the densities of these active species with plasma assistance.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33344843 PMCID: PMC7745419 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04735
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Simulation results of the applied voltage Va, the discharge gap voltage Vg, and the discharge current density Jg calculated by the present methane–air NPDBD plasma model.
Figure 2Experimental results of the applied voltage Va and the discharge current density Jg derived from the methane–air NPDBD plasma experiment in ref (28).
Figure 3Discharge current densities in the methane–air NPDBD plasma under different amplitudes of the applied voltage.
Figure 4Averaged particle densities of the electrons, all negatively charged particles, and all positively charged particles (left y axis) as well as the maximum discharge current densities (right y axis) in the methane–air NPDBD plasma under different amplitudes of the applied voltage.
Figure 5Spatial distributions of (a) electric field intensities, (b) densities of all negatively charged particles, and (c) densities all positively charged particles at the time when the discharge current density reaches the maximum in the methane–air NPDBD plasma under different amplitudes of the applied voltage.
Figure 6Averaged particle densities of the significant active species in the methane–air NPDBD plasma under different amplitudes of the applied voltage.
Figure 7Two-dimensional spatial evolutions of the temperatures in the methane–air planar shear flow combustions (a) without and (b) with plasma assistance.
Figure 8Two-dimensional spatial evolutions of the CH3 mole fractions in the methane–air planar shear flow combustions (a) without and (b) with plasma assistance.
Figure 9Temperatures in the methane–air planar shear flow combustions without and with plasma assistance under different amplitudes of the applied voltage.
Figure 10Mole fractions of (a) CH3, (b) HO2, (c) CH3OH, (d) C2H4, (e) C2H6, and (f) CH2O in the methane–air planar shear flow combustions without and with plasma assistance under different amplitudes of the applied voltage.
Figure 11Mole fractions of (a) O, (b) H, and (c) OH in the methane–air planar shear flow combustions without and with plasma assistance under different amplitudes of the applied voltage.
Figure 12Reaction pathway map of the methane–air NPDBD plasma when the applied voltage amplitude is 11 kV.
Figure 13Reaction pathway map of the methane–air combustion without plasma assistance.
Figure 14Reaction pathway map of the methane–air combustion with plasma assistance when the applied voltage amplitude is 11 kV.
Figure 15Schematic of the NPDBD plasma-assisted combustion system used in this work.
Species Considered in the Methane–Air NPDBD Plasma
| gas type | charged species | neutral species |
|---|---|---|
| methane | C+, H+, H2+, H3+, CH+, CH2+, CH3+, CH4+, CH5+, C2H2+, C2H4+, C2H5+, e–, H–, CH2– | C, H, H2, CH, CH2, CH3, CH4, C2H, C2H2, C2H3, C2H4, C2H5, C2H6, C3H5, C3H6, C3H7, C3H8 |
| air | O+, O2+, O4+, N2+, N3+, N4+, NO+, NO2+, N2O+, e–, O–, O2–, O3–, O4–, NO–, NO2–, NO3–, N2O– | O, O2, O3, N, N2, NO, NO2, NO3, N2O, N2O3, N2O4, N2O5, O(1D), O2(a), N(2D), N2(A), N2(B), N2(a′), |
| methane/air | OH+, H2O+, H3O+, e–, OH– | OH, H2O, HO2, H2O2, CO, CO2, HNO, HNO2, HNO3, CHO, CH2O, CH2OH, CH3OH, CN, HCN, C2HO |