| Literature DB >> 33344679 |
Raheleh Soltani1, Gholamreza Sharifirad2, Behzad Mahaki3, Ahmad Ali Eslami4.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Oral self- care is an important aspect of lifestyle and a serious public health issue.Entities:
Keywords: Child; Dental caries; Educational intervention; Health Education; Mothers; Oral health; Self- Care; Theory of Planned Behavior
Year: 2020 PMID: 33344679 PMCID: PMC7737928 DOI: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.81811.0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent (Shiraz) ISSN: 2345-6418
Number of items, range and Cranach’s Alpha based on the TPB (Theory of Planned Behavior) constructs
| TPB constructs | Items example | Options | Numbe of itemsr | Range score | Cranach’s Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | |||||
| Attitude | In my opinion, oral health problems can lead to general health problems in children | 1= Completely disagree | 6 | 6-30 | 0.81 |
| 2= Disagree | |||||
| 3= No idea | |||||
| 4= Agree | |||||
| 5 = Completely agree | |||||
| Subjective Norms | Most people who are important to me (e.g. family, dentist, health nurses) think that my child must brush his/her teeth at least a once a day | 1= Completely disagree | 6 | 6-30 | 0.89 |
| 2= Disagree | |||||
| 3= No idea | |||||
| 4= Agree | |||||
| 5 = Completely agree | |||||
| Perceived Behavioral Control | I am confident that I could perform my child oral self-care | 1= Completely disagree | 3 | 3-15 | 0.88 |
| 2= Disagree | |||||
| 3= No idea | |||||
| 4= Agree | |||||
| 5 = Completely agree | |||||
| Intention | I intend to help my child in teeth brushing | 1 = Completely agree | 3 | 3-15 | 0.75 |
| 2= Agree | |||||
| 3= No idea | |||||
| 4= Disagree | |||||
| 5 = Completely disagree |
Details of the educational intervention program on mothers’ about oral health for children
| Presentation by | Time | Activity and learning objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Health care provider | 100-120 min | |
| Dentist and Health care provider | 150 min | |
| Dentist, Nutritionist and Health care provider | 120-150 | |
Demographic characteristics and mean (standard deviation) of TPB (Theory of Planned Behavior) structures of participants in control (n=74) and Experimental (n=74) groups
| Variables | Category | Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) Experimental | N (%) Control | |||
| Maternal age | 18-28years | 25(33.7) | 26(35.1) | 0.94 |
| 29-39years | 38(51.4) | 36(48.6) | ||
| 40-49years | 11(14.9) | 12(16.3) | ||
| Maternal education | Primary | 4(5.4) | 3(4) | 0.97 |
| Middle school | 10(13.5) | 9(12.2) | ||
| High school | 10(13.5) | 8(10.8) | ||
| Diploma | 38(51.4) | 40(54.1) | ||
| College or university | 12 (16.2) | 14(18.9) | ||
| Number of children | 1 | 33(44.5) | 40(54.1) | 0.56 |
| 2to3 | 35(47.3) | 31(41.9) | ||
| <3 | 6(8.2) | 3(4) | ||
| Mother’s occupation | Employed | 1(1.4) | 3(4.2) | 0.34 |
| Unemployed | 73(98.6) | 71(95.8) | ||
| Child’s gender | Male | 40(48.2) | 42(51.2) | 0.49 |
| Female | 34(51.5) | 32(48.5) | ||
| Economic Status | Low | 17(23) | 18(21.3) | 0.36 |
| Medium | 43(58.1) | 40(54.1) | ||
| High | 14(18.9) | 16(21.6) | ||
| TPB structure Mean(SD) | Attitude | 22.1 (5.3) | 21.8(5.5) | 0.33t |
| Subjective norms | 24.8 (5) | 25.3(4.5) | 0.52t | |
| Perceived behavioral control | 9.3(3) | 9.7(2.8) | 0.35t | |
| Intention | 8.1(2) | 8.4(1.8) | 0.39t | |
Statistical test was Chi square test, T Statistical test was independent sample t test (between groups), SD: Standard deviation
Comparing of mean and standard deviation of TPB (Theory of Planned Behavior) structures and the oral self- care in the experimental and control group before and after intervention
| TPB constructs | Groups | Baseline | Time 1 | Time2 | Time3 | Time | Group | Time/group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (S.D) | Mean (S.D) | Mean (S.D) | Mean (S.D) | F(df) | ƞ2 | |||||
| Attitude | Experimental | 22.1 (5.3) | 25 (4.3) | 26.9(3.8) | 27.2(3.6) | <0.001 | 80(1.8,136) | 0.55 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Control | 21.8(5.5) | 22(5.4) | 22.1(5.5) | 22.3(5.5) | 0.149 | 1.8(2.4,181) | 0.025 | |||
| Subjective norm | Experimental | 24.8 (5) | 27.9(2.3) | 28.1(1.8) | 28.2(1.8) | 0.001 | 34(1.3,83) | 0.32 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| Control | 25.3(4.5) | 25.5(4.2) | 25.6(4.1) | 25.4(4.4) | 0.126 | 2(1.9,155) | 0.028 | |||
| Perceived behavioral control | Experimental | 9.3(3) | 11.2(2.8) | 11.9(2.2) | 13(2) | <0.001 | 111(1.9,14) | 0.60 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Control | 9.7(2.8) | 9.7(3) | 10(2.9) | 10(2.8) | 0.41 | 0.96(2.7,20) | 0.013 | |||
| Intention | Experimental | 8.1(2) | 10.7(2.5) | 11.7(2.5) | 12.5(2.1) | <0.001 | 153(2.3,17) | 0.67 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Control | 8.4(1.8) | 8.5(1.6) | 8.5(1.8) | 8.7(1.9) | 0.22 | 1.8(2.4.175) | 0.020 | |||
| Maternal oral self-care behavior | Experimental | 5.9(1.7) | 7.8(1.9) | 8.5(1.9) | 8.7(1.1.8) | <0.001 | 107(2,149) | 0.59 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Control | 6.1(1.8) | 6 (1.8) | 6.2(1.7) | 6.2(1.8) | 0.22 | 1.3(1.5,110) | 0.018 | |||
| Children’s oral self- care behavior | Experimental | 3.7(1.9) | 6.1(1.6) | 6.6(1.5) | 6.4(1.6) | <0.001 | 66(1.2,87) | 0.47 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Control | 4.1(1.8) | 4.4(2) | 4.3 (1.9) | 4.4(2) | 0.28 | 2.7 (1.3,90) | 0.037 | |||
Time1: immediately after intervention, Time2: 3 months after intervention, Time3:6 months after intervention, P :P-value, SD: Standard deviation. * Statistical test was Repeated measure ANOVA.
Comparing of children's tooth brushing in the experimental and control group before and 6 months after intervention
| Category | Before N (%) | After N (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Control | Experimental | Control | |
| Never | (31. 1)23 | (27)20 | - | (17.6) 13 |
| Irregular | (10.8)8 | (13.5)10 | (2.7)2 | (20.3)15 |
| a few times a week | (13.5)10 | (16.2)12 | (8.1)6 | (20.3) 15 |
| Once a day | (36.5)28 | (35.1)26 | (33.8)25 | 32.4)) 24 |
| Twice or more a day | (8.1)6 | (8.1)6 | (55.4)41 | (9.1) 7 |
chi-square test was used, N (%)= Number(%)