| Literature DB >> 33344593 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hernia is a common condition requiring abdominal surgery. The current standard treatment for hernia is tension-free repair using meshes. Globally, more than 200 new types of meshes are licensed each year. However, their clinical applications are associated with a series of complications, such as recurrence (10% - 24%) and infection (0.5% - 9.0%). In contrast, 3D-printed meshes have significantly reduced the postoperative complications in patients. They have also shortened operating time and minimized the loss of mesh materials. In this study, we used the myopectineal orifice (MPO) data obtained from preoperative computer tomography (CT)-based 3D reconstruction for the production of 3D-printed biologic meshes. AIM: To investigate the application of multislice spiral CT-based 3D reconstruction technique in 3D-printed biologic mesh for hernia repair surgery.Entities:
Keywords: 3D-printed biologic meshes; Computer tomography-based 3D reconstruction; Hernia; Inguinal; Inguinal hernia; Myopectineal orifice
Year: 2020 PMID: 33344593 PMCID: PMC7723694 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5944
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Clin Cases ISSN: 2307-8960 Impact factor: 1.337
Figure 1Comparison of the measurement points marked in the computer tomography-based 3D reconstruction images and during the surgery. A: The pubic tubercle; B: Intersection of the horizontal line extending from the summit of the inferior edge of the internal oblique and transversus abdominis and the outer edge of the rectus abdominis, C: Intersection of the horizontal line extending from the summit of the inferior edge of the internal oblique and transversus abdominis and the inguinal ligament, D: Intersection of the iliopsoas muscle and the inguinal ligament, and E: Intersection of the iliopsoas muscle and the superior pubic ramus.
Comparison of preoperative computer tomography measurement data and intraoperative measurement data
|
|
|
|
|
| AB, preoperative | 7.576 ± 0.212 | 0.014 | 0.990 |
| AB, intraoperative | 7.573 ± 0.266 | ||
| AC, preoperative | 7.627 ± 0.212 | 0.147 | 0.891 |
| AC, intraoperative | 7.627 ± 0.212 | ||
| BC, preoperative | 7.677 ± 0.229 | 0.752 | 0.494 |
| BC, intraoperative | 7.567 ± 0.786 | ||
| DE, preoperative | 7.589 ± 0.204 | 0.585 | 0.590 |
| DE, intraoperative | 7.512 ± 0.21 | ||
| AE, preoperative | 7.617 ± 0.231 | 0.214 | 0.841 |
| AE, intraoperative | 7.582 ± 0.189 |
A: The pubic tubercle; B: Intersection of the horizontal line extending from the summit of the inferior edge of the internal oblique and transversus abdominis and the outer edge of the rectus abdominis, C: Intersection of the horizontal line extending from the summit of the inferior edge of the internal oblique and transversus abdominis and the inguinal ligament, D: Intersection of the iliopsoas muscle and the inguinal ligament, and E: Intersection of the iliopsoas muscle and the superior pubic ramus.
Figure 2Comparison of preoperative computer tomography measurement data and intraoperative measurement data. A: The pubic tubercle; B: Intersection of the horizontal line extending from the summit of the inferior edge of the internal oblique and transversus abdominis and the outer edge of the rectus abdominis, C: Intersection of the horizontal line extending from the summit of the inferior edge of the internal oblique and transversus abdominis and the inguinal ligament, D: Intersection of the iliopsoas muscle and the inguinal ligament, and E: Intersection of the iliopsoas muscle and the superior pubic ramus.