Feng-Ping Zhou1, Cheng-Cheng Wang2, Hua-Ping Du1, Shan-Bo Cao2, Jin Zhang3. 1. Department of Hematology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China. 2. Acornmed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100176, China. 3. Department of Hematology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China. zfpingzd@zju.edu.cn.
Core Tip: We report a rare case of primary myelofibrosis in which a CALR and MPL co-mutation was detected by next-generation sequencing technology. It demonstrated that CALR and MPL mutations can be concurrent in myeloproliferative neoplasm. We review the literature, analyze previous reports of the mutation sites in our patient and differences between our patient and other reported cases of co-mutated CALR and MPL genes, and discuss the reason why the CALR and MPL co-mutations are rare and possible mechanisms and their impact on the prognosis of patients.
INTRODUCTION
Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by recurrent mutations in the JAK2, CALR, and MPL genes. Although these mutations were initially reported to be mutually exclusive in MPN, several studies have reported the presence of JAK2-CALR or JAK2-MPL co-mutations in PMF patients[1-4], and CALR and MPL co-mutation cases are still very rarely reported. With the increasingly wide application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, rare myelofibrosis cases with co-mutated CALR and MPL genes are increasingly being detected. Here, we report a patient with PMF, in which co-mutated CALR and MPL genes were detected.
CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints
Abdominal distension for 2 mo.
History of present illness
A 73-year-old woman was admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine in 2018 due to abdominal distension for 2 mo, especially after eating with no complaints of abdominal pain, diarrhea, vomiting, or reduced anal exhaust and defecation.
History of past illness
The patient had a history of a left kidney cyst.
Personal and family history
She denied any other specific personal or family history of other diseases.
Physical examination
The patient’s conjunctiva and skin were pale, and the sclera was not yellow. Slightly swollen lymph nodes could be felt in the neck and armpit. The abdomen looked a little distended and felt soft, with no tenderness; the spleen under the ribs could be felt, and the texture was slightly hard. The rest of the abdomen did not have any obvious masses. The bowels sounded normal.
Laboratory examinations
Peripheral blood tests demonstrated a leukocyte count of 2.9 × 109/L, platelet count of 126 × 109/L, and hemoglobin of 87 g/L, and a smear revealed immature granulocytes of 4%. Liver function tests showed normal levels of transaminases, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, serum creatinine, and potassium. Lactate dehydrogenase was 570 IU/L, and total cholesterol was 2.6 mmol/L.
Imaging examinations
An abdominal computed tomography scan showed that the spleen was enlarged and uniform (Figure 1), with a left kidney cyst. Abdominal ultrasound showed that the spleen was enlarged, with a thickness of 5.6 cm and a length of 16.1 cm.
Figure 1
Computed tomography images showing splenomegaly. A and B: Abdominal computed tomography images showing that the inferior margin of the spleen was lower than that of the liver (A) and reached the level of abdominal aortic bifurcation (B).
Computed tomography images showing splenomegaly. A and B: Abdominal computed tomography images showing that the inferior margin of the spleen was lower than that of the liver (A) and reached the level of abdominal aortic bifurcation (B).
Pathological examination
Bone marrow aspiration revealed erythroid and megakaryocytic hyperplasia; dacrocytes were easily observed, and megakaryocytes had atypia (Figure 2). Bone marrow biopsy showed megakaryocytic proliferation and atypia, accompanied by reticulin fibrosis grade 2 (Figure 3).
Figure 2
Bone marrow aspiration findings. A: Dacrocytes were easily observed; B-D: Images showing the presence of megakaryocyte atypia, including abnormal nuclear-cytoplasmic ratios, malformed nucleus (B), abnormal chromatin clumping with hyperchromatic nucleus (C), and extensive lobulation of the nucleus (D).
Figure 3
Bone marrow biopsy findings. A: Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed megakaryocytic proliferation and clustered distribution (magnification, 200 ×); B: Gomori staining showed diffuse and dense increase in reticulin fibres (magnification, 200 ×).
Bone marrow aspiration findings. A: Dacrocytes were easily observed; B-D: Images showing the presence of megakaryocyte atypia, including abnormal nuclear-cytoplasmic ratios, malformed nucleus (B), abnormal chromatin clumping with hyperchromatic nucleus (C), and extensive lobulation of the nucleus (D).Bone marrow biopsy findings. A: Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed megakaryocytic proliferation and clustered distribution (magnification, 200 ×); B: Gomori staining showed diffuse and dense increase in reticulin fibres (magnification, 200 ×).
Examination for gene mutations
The bone marrow samples were sequenced by NGS, which showed mutations in CALR, MPL, and PIK3RI (Table 1), while JAK2 V617F and BCR-ABL were negative.
Table 1
Gene mutation list in the primary myelofibrosis patient
Gene
VAF
HGVS
Exonic function
CALR
30.04%
NM_004343: c.1092_1143del (p.364fs)
Frameshift deletion
MPL
50.11%
NM_005373: c.1908A>G (p.X636W)
Nonsynonymous SNV
PIK3R1
3.18%
NM_00181523: c.683delG (p.R228fs)
Frameshift deletion
VAF: Variant allele frequency; HGVS: Human Genome Variation Society; SNV: Single nucleotide variant.
Gene mutation list in the primary myelofibrosispatientVAF: Variant allele frequency; HGVS: Human Genome Variation Society; SNV: Single nucleotide variant.
FINAL DIAGNOSIS
The patient was ultimately diagnosed with PMF (International Prognostic Scoring System score = 3, high risk).
TREATMENT
The patient received oral ruxolitinib 15 mg twice per day.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP
Half a year later, the spleen response was poor, and the size of the spleen increased from 16.1 × 5.6 cm to 17.7 × 6.6 cm. Anemia was progressively aggravated in the meantime and developed to blood transfusion dependence, indicating that PMF with co-mutated MPL and CALR genes cannot benefit from ruxolitinib.
DISCUSSION
Most PMF patients carry JAK2, MPL, or CALR driver mutations[5]. Mutations in MPL and CALR are drivers in the pathogenesis of MPNs, and mutant CALR can bind with MPL to activate the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Previous studies have shown that JAK2, MPL, and CALR are mutually exclusively mutated in MPN patients[6,7]. However, studies have also reported the presence of JAK2-CALR or JAK2-MPL co-mutations in PMF patients[1-4], and cases of CALR and MPL co-mutations are still very rarely reported. Here, we report the case of a PMF patient with CALR-p.364fs and MPL-p.X636W mutations. The CALR-p.364fs mutation is usually detected in essential thrombocytosis (ET) and PMF patients, while the MPL-p.X636W mutation is not a common mutation and has only been reported in refractory anemia with ring sideroblast patients[8,9]. Furthermore, we also detected a low-burden PIK3R1 mutation in this case. The PIK3R1 gene belongs to the Akt signaling pathway and plays a direct role in regulating cell survival, growth, and differentiation. Mutated PIK3R1 can cause aberrant PI3K signaling, and the p.R228fs mutation site has already been reported in acute lymphocytic leukemiapatients[10,11]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a CALR and MPL double mutant PMF patient from East Asia.Earlier research reports show that CALR and MPL mutations are mutually exclusive in MPN patients. This case demonstrated that CALR and MPL mutations can coexist in MPN patients. Three MPN cases with co-mutated CALR and MPL genes have already been reported since 2017[12-14]. Partouche et al[12] reported that a post-ET PMF patient carried type I CALR and MPLW515R mutations, with an variant allele frequency (VAF) of 59.1% and 31.7%, respectively. Tashkandi et al[13] reported a post-ET PMF patient carrying a CALR (p.L367Tfs*46) mutation at an allele frequency of 47% and two MPL (p.S505C and p.W515L) mutations at a lower allele frequency of 4%. Bernal et al[14] detected a CALR (p.L367fs*48) mutation at an allele frequency of 30% and a MPL (p.Trip515L) mutation at an allele frequency of 11.75% in an ET patient. In contrast to these reported cases, we identified an uncommon mutation in MPL (p.X636W) in PMF patients, and its VAF was higher than that of the CALR mutation in our patient.Patients with concurrent CALR and MPL mutations are truly rare in the clinic. In PMF patients, the frequency of CALR (20%-25%) and MPL (7%) gene mutations is low[1,6,7]. Before 2017, there were no case reports about CALR and MPL co-mutations. Currently, a few MPN patients have been detected, which is inseparable from the progress of molecular testing technology. From previous cases, we can see that in MPN patients, a MPL mutation VAF is usually low[2,3,15], and some uncommon mutations exist. Traditional Sanger sequencing may miss these mutations because of its test range and sensitivity[7,13-15]. High-throughput sequencing may cover the full loci, and the detection VAF limit was lowered to 1%. Therefore, MPN patients with concurrent CALR and MPL mutations can be accurately detected.The MPL mutation may have been a molecular event independent of the CALR deletion or a secondary event in the CALR-containing clone. Some researchers have proven that the CALR gene mutation is an early event during disease development, and MPL is a passenger event[2,13]. It is speculated that the mutated CALR gene can trigger genome instability, which then causes mutations in the MPL gene[13]. This is a possible explanation for why CALR and MPL can co-mutate. However, in our case, the MPL mutation was improbable as a secondary event because its VAF was more than 50%, indicating the possibility of a germline mutation. Some research has already proven that MPN patients can carry germline MPN mutations[16-18]. The co-mutation mechanism is not clear and still needs more investigations.Gene mutations can predict prognosis in PMF patients. CALR mutations indicate a good prognosis in ET and PMF patients[19,20]. Compared to JAK2 or triple-negative patients, CALR mutation-positive patients have a longer overall survival and low risk of thrombogenesis[1,7,19,21]. Patients who harbor the MPLW515L/K mutation have a moderate prognosis and higher risk of thrombogenesis than CALR mutation-positive patients[19]. The prognosis of patients with MPL and CALR co-mutations is still unknown due to the limited number of patients, but it seems that these patients have more aggressive progression based on our patient and other reported cases[12,13]. Our patient’s disease progression was rapid. In Partouche’s and Tashkandi’s patients, the CALR mutation was a pre-existing clone in the ET stage, and the MPL mutation was acquired when the disease developed into PMF. Disease acceleration may be associated with MPL-mutated clones. Because of the lack of patients with coexisting mutations, further investigations in large cohorts are needed to better quantify the presence and clinical significance.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, we have described a rare case of PMF with concurrent CALR and MPL mutations. This demonstrates that CALR and MPL mutations are not mutually exclusive in MPN. The use of NGS may help to identify more patients with CALR and MPL co-mutations. This will help to further explore the mechanism and its impact on these patients to develop appropriate treatment strategies.
Authors: A Pardanani; P Guglielmelli; T L Lasho; A Pancrazzi; C M Finke; A M Vannucchi; A Tefferi Journal: Leukemia Date: 2011-06-21 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: F Palandri; R Latagliata; N Polverelli; A Tieghi; M Crugnola; B Martino; M Perricone; M Breccia; E Ottaviani; N Testoni; F Merli; F Aversa; G Alimena; M Cavo; G Martinelli; L Catani; M Baccarani; N Vianelli Journal: Leukemia Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Animesh D Pardanani; Ross L Levine; Terra Lasho; Yana Pikman; Ruben A Mesa; Martha Wadleigh; David P Steensma; Michelle A Elliott; Alexandra P Wolanskyj; William J Hogan; Rebecca F McClure; Mark R Litzow; D Gary Gilliland; Ayalew Tefferi Journal: Blood Date: 2006-07-25 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Anna K Andersson; Jing Ma; Jianmin Wang; Xiang Chen; Amanda Larson Gedman; Jinjun Dang; Joy Nakitandwe; Linda Holmfeldt; Matthew Parker; John Easton; Robert Huether; Richard Kriwacki; Michael Rusch; Gang Wu; Yongjin Li; Heather Mulder; Susana Raimondi; Stanley Pounds; Guolian Kang; Lei Shi; Jared Becksfort; Pankaj Gupta; Debbie Payne-Turner; Bhavin Vadodaria; Kristy Boggs; Donald Yergeau; Jayanthi Manne; Guangchun Song; Michael Edmonson; Panduka Nagahawatte; Lei Wei; Cheng Cheng; Deqing Pei; Rosemary Sutton; Nicola C Venn; Albert Chetcuti; Amanda Rush; Daniel Catchpoole; Jesper Heldrup; Thoas Fioretos; Charles Lu; Li Ding; Ching-Hon Pui; Sheila Shurtleff; Charles G Mullighan; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; Tanja A Gruber; Jinghui Zhang; James R Downing Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 38.330