| Literature DB >> 33344536 |
Mansour Sobeh1,2, Soha A Hassan3, Mahmoud A E Hassan4, Wael A Khalil5, Mohamed A O Abdelfattah6, Michael Wink2, Abdelaziz Yasri1.
Abstract
The Splinter bean, Entada abyssinica, is widely used in folk medicine. In the current work, we profiled the secondary metabolites from E. abyssinica bark extract using LC-MS and investigated its effect on cryopreserved ram semen. Twenty-eight compounds, including tannins and gallic acid derivatives that prevailed in the extract, were tentatively identified. Results showed that the quality of the post-thawed semen showed a significant improvement when the extract was added to the extender at a concentration of 375 μg/mL. The progressive motility and plasma membrane integrity of sperm cells were significantly increased in the post-thawed semen; however, the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) was insignificantly increased. A significant decrease in the concentration of hydrogen peroxide was detected as well. No significant changes were observed in activities of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alanine aminotransaminase (ALT), and aspartate transaminase (AST) within the treated samples. Intact sperm percentage was significantly increased, while apoptotic and necrotic sperm percentages were reduced significantly. Molecular docking of some individual components from the extract revealed their potential to interfere with the apoptosis cascade in which Bcl-2 is involved. In conclusion, Entada abyssinica appears to be useful for cryopreservation presumably owing to its polyphenol content that has potent antioxidant capacity scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS), enhancing the endogenous antioxidant system and inhibiting lipid peroxidation.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant biomarker; Entada abyssinica; polyphenolics; semen cryopreservation; sperm ultrastructure
Year: 2020 PMID: 33344536 PMCID: PMC7740001 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.604477
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Phytochemical profiling of Entada abyssinica bark extract.
| 1 | 1.53 | 133 | 115 | Malic acid |
| 2 | 2.37 | 417 | 153, 241, 285 | Gentisic acid dipentoside |
| 3 | 3.18 | 609 | 179, 305, 441 | (epi)Gallocatechin-(epi)gallocatechin |
| 4 | 5.25 | 593 | 289, 407, 425 | (epi)Catechin-(epi)gallocatechin |
| 5 | 6.26 | 305 | 179, 221, 287 | (epi)Gallocatechin |
| 6 | 10.97 | 761 | 305, 423, 609 | (epi)Gallocatechin-(epi)gallocatechin gallate |
| 7 | 11.50 | 183 | 125, 169, 183 | Methylgallate |
| 8 | 12.19 | 483 | 169, 271, 331 | Digalloyl glucose |
| 9 | 13.05 | 289 | 179, 205, 245 | (epi)Catechin |
| 10 | 17.47 | 457 | 179, 305 | Gallocatechin gallate |
| 11 | 18.17 | 745 | 289, 407, 593 | (epi)Catechin-(epi)gallocatechin gallate |
| 12 | 18.98 | 457 | 169, 305, 331 | (epi)Gallocatechin gallate |
| 13 | 20.17 | 729 | 289, 559, 577 | (epi)Catechin-(epi)catechin gallate |
| 14 | 20.65 | 457 | 179, 305 | Gallocatechin gallate |
| 15 | 21.78 | 617 | 285, 493, 599 | Kaempferol syringyl gallate |
| 16 | 22.60 | 729 | 289, 559, 577 | (epi)Catechin-(epi)catechin gallate |
| 17 | 25.19 | 541 | 169, 211, 271, 541 | Hydroxybenzoylbenzyl- |
| 18 | 26.35 | 615 | 271, 301, 463 | Quercetin galloylglucose |
| 19 | 27.73 | 441 | 179, 245, 289 | Catechin gallate |
| 20 | 28.73 | 441 | 179, 245, 289 | (epi)Catechin gallate |
| 21 | 30.34 | 477 | 169, 315, 331, 417 | Coumaroyl- |
| 22 | 32.19 | 507 | 169, 323, 445, 447 | Methyl gallate caffeoylglucose |
| 23 | 34.12 | 601 | 169, 313, 439 | Caffeoyl pyrogallol galloylglucose |
| 24 | 36.38 | 435 | 273 | Phlorizin |
| 25 | 37.86 | 521 | 169, 271, 331 | Dimethyl caffeoyl galloylglucose |
| 26 | 39.10 | 585 | 169, 313, 439 | |
| 27 | 41.88 | 477 | 169, 313, 327 | Coumaroyl- |
| 28 | 43.45 | 461 | 169, 313, 401 | Cinnamoyl- |
Identified according to Sobeh et al. (.
Antioxidant activity of the methanol bark extract of Entada abyssinica.
| Bark extract | 35.8 | 13.21 | 240 |
| Ascorbic acid | 2.92 ± 0.29 | – | – |
| Quercetin | – | 24.04 ± 1.23 | – |
Ascorbic acid and quercetin are positive controls. DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate; FRAP, ferric-reducing antioxidant power assay; TPC, total phenolic content.
Sperm characteristics in extender of post equilibrated (at 5°C for 4 h) fresh ram semen supplemented with different concentrations of the bark extract (means ± SE, n = 5).
| Control | 81.0, 1.87 | 77.6, 3.50 | 7.6, 1.03 | 75.4, 2.42 | 92.4, 0.51 |
| Extract 125 μg/mL | 84.0, 1.87 | 82.6, 1.60 | 8.4, 0.51 | 81.2, 2.01 | 93.4, 1.33 |
| Extract 250 μg/mL | 84.0, 1.87 | 79.6, 1.63 | 10.2, 1.46 | 82.8, 1.59 | 94.0, 1.30 |
| Extract 375 μg/mL | 86.0, 1.87 | 82.8, 1.85 | 7.8, 0.49 | 84.0, 1.70 | 93.0, 0.45 |
| Extract 500 μg/mL | 80.0, 2.24 | 77.6, 1.44 | 10.4, 1.44 | 78.2, 1.53 | 94.0, 0.71 |
Means denoted within the same column with different superscripts are significantly different at p < 0.05 compared with the control group.
Sperm characteristics in extender of post-thawed ram semen supplemented with different concentrations of the bark extract (means ± SE, n = 5).
| Control | 48.0, 2.55 | 44.6, 3.63 | 43.4, 2.80 | 88.2, 0.86 | 12.4, 0.51 |
| Extract 125 μg/mL | 56.0, 1.87 | 48.6, 2.34 | 45.6, 2.16 | 88.8, 0.58 | 12.8, 0.97 |
| Extract 250 μg/mL | 56.0, 2.92 | 48.8, 1.91 | 45.4, 2.36 | 88.0, 1.73 | 14.4, 2.01 |
| Extract 375 μg/mL | 59.0, 1.87 | 51.0, 1.90 | 53.6, 2.87 | 86.8, 0.80 | 15.6, 1.29 |
| Extract 500 μg/mL | 52.0, 2.00ab | 45.8, 2.08 | 41.2, 2.03 | 88.0, 0.84 | 14.8, 0.97 |
Means denoted within the same column with different superscripts are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Antioxidant capacity, oxidative stress, and enzymatic activity in extender of post-thawed ram semen supplemented with different concentrations of the bark extract (Means ± SE, n = 3).
| Control | 0.20, 0.07 | 0.36, 0.05 | 147.5, 24.84 | 67.3, 3.33 | 18.7, 0.67 |
| Extract 125 μg/mL | 0.31, 0.05 | 0.27, 0.01bc | 139.4, 38.17 | 52.7, 6.36 | 15.3, 2.40 |
| Extract 250 μg/mL | 0.36, 0.03 | 0.27, 0.03bc | 143.9, 19.48 | 48.7, 7.69 | 16.0, 1.15 |
| Extract 375 μg/mL | 0.45, 0.03 | 0.2, 0.06 | 134.0, 10.94 | 49.3, 9.33 | 16.7, 1.76 |
| Extract 500 μg/mL | 0.30, 0.09 | 0.45, 0.05 | 118.7, 6.79 | 68.0, 4.00 | 16.0, 2.31 |
Means denoted within the same column with different superscripts are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 1Transmission electron microscope (TEM) micrographs of ram spermatozoa in post-thawed semen showing (A) normal sperm with complete nuclei (N), homogenous condensed chromatin, intact acrosomal cap (AC), normal plasma membrane (PM). (B) Early apoptotic sperm cells with mildly swollen plasma membrane (PM). (C) Sperm with apoptotic nucleus characterized by marginated chromatin (MC), cytoplasmic residue (CPR), broken plasma membrane (PM), detached with apical ridge formed near the tip of acrosomal cap (DAC), degenerated acrosome. (D) Sperm with necrotic chromatin (NC), with cytoplasmic residue (CPR), lost plasma membrane (LPM), and degenerated acrosome (DAC).
Percentage of sperm groups characterized using TEM in extender of post-thawed ram semen supplemented with different concentrations of the bark extract (Means ± SE, n = 3).
| Control | 38.3 ± 2.03 | 40.3 ± 0.88 | 21.3 ± 1.86 |
| Extract 125 μg/mL | 48.0 ± 2.08 | 31.7 ± 1.86 | 21.7 ± 2.03 |
| Extract 250 μg/mL | 41.7 ± 0.88 | 30.3 ± 0.88 | 28.0 ± 0.58 |
| Extract 375 μg/mL | 53.3 ± 1.45 | 21.7 ± 1.45 | 25.0 ± 1.73 |
| Extract 500 μg/mL | 16.3 ± 2.03 | 53.3 ± 2.19 | 30.3 ± 0.67 |
Means denoted within the same column with different superscripts are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Docking scores of the docking poses obtained upon docking major compounds identified in the bark extract to Bcl-2:BH3 complex interface.
| 5 | Epigallocatechin | −13.16 |
| 6 | Epigallocatechin-epigallocatechin gallate | −16.49 |
| 8 | Digalloyl glucose | −12.72 |
| 12 | Epigallocatechin gallate | −15.69 |
| 13 | Epicatechin-epicatechin gallate | −16.66 |
| 18 | Quercetin galloylglucose | −13.62 |
| 20 | Epicatechin gallate | −13.89 |
| 24 | Phlorizin | −9.44 |
| 25 | Dimethyl caffeoyl galloylglucose | −13.57 |
| 26 | −13.23 | |
| 27 | −13.12 | |
| 28 | Cinnamoyl galloylglucose | −10.32 |
Figure 2Three-dimensional poses of compounds 6 (top) and 18 (bottom) docked into the Bcl-2:BH3 surface interface.