| Literature DB >> 33344244 |
Zhen Lin1,2, Xianyi Meng1,2, Jinming Wen1,2, José María Corral3, Darja Andreev1,2, Katerina Kachler1,2, Georg Schett1,2, Xiaoxiang Chen4, Aline Bozec1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human malignant melanoma is a highly aggressive, heterogeneous and drug-resistant cancer. Due to a high number of clones, harboring various mutations that affect key pathways, there is an exceptional level of phenotypic variation and intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) in melanoma. This poses a significant challenge to personalized cancer medicine. Hitherto, it remains unclear to what extent the heterogeneity of melanoma affects the immune microenvironment. Herein, we explore the interaction between the tumor heterogeneity and the host immune response in a melanoma cohort utilizing The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).Entities:
Keywords: The Cancer Genome Atlas; immunomodulator; intratumor heterogeneity; melanoma; tumor infiltrating lymphocytes
Year: 2020 PMID: 33344244 PMCID: PMC7747763 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.596493
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1High heterogeneity is associated with decreased patient survival in TCGA melanoma cohort. (A) Distribution of the overall intratumor heterogeneity estimated by CHAT algorithm (n = 71, 39, 136, 130,41,9). (B) Kaplan–Meier analysis for overall survival rate of patients. Log-rank test was performed to evaluate the survival differences. (C) The prediction performance of CHAT clones for 5-, 8- and 10-year overall survival by the ROC analysis. (D) Boxplots correlating CHAT with purity and Breslow thickness depth. (E) Multivariable Cox regression analysis of the CHAT clones.
Figure 2High heterogeneity is associated with reduced anti-tumor immune cell infiltration. (A) Cell composition fractions comparison containing 22 immune cell types between ITH high and low groups in the TCGA cohort by Wilcoxon’s test. (B) Correlation analysis among M1, M2, Tfh cell, resting Mast cell, CD8+T cell and clones by Spearman test. Clones is positively correlated with resting Mast cells, M2 and negatively correlated with M1, CD8+T cells, Tfh cell. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Figure 3Tumor heterogeneity is associated with the regulation of Immunomodulator. (A) Heatmap of immunomodulator genes among the CHAT 6 clones. Data normalized by Z score transformation is used. (B) The gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of immunomodulator genes (NES = −2.769; p = 0.001). (C) PD1 and PD-L1 expression sectioned by clonal subclasses (Student's t test,***p < 0.001. spearman’s rho = −0.266; p <0.0001 and spearman’s rho = −0.224; p <0.0001).
Figure 4Tumor heterogeneity is associated with less immune cytolytic activity. (A) Volcano plot of ssGSEA enrichment score difference (x-axis) versus –log10 p value (y-axis) of BIOCARTA pathway changes in the TCGA cohort. (B) TCYTOTOXIC Pathway and CTL Pathway scores sectioned by clonal subclasses (Student's t test,***p < 0.001. spearman’s rho = −0.253; p <0.0001 and spearman’s rho = −0.273; p <0.0001).
Figure 5Tumor heterogeneity is associated with immune-related proteins. (A) LCK and (B) SYK normalized protein expression in RPPA array are subdivided by clonal subclasses (Student's t test, **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001. spearman’s rho = −0.235; p <0.0001 and spearman’s rho = −0.187; p = 0.0011).