AIM: To compare the differences in kinetics, distribution, and toxicity of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) between the injection methods, sub-Tenon and intravitreal injections in rabbit ocular tissues. METHODS: TA was injected into the vitreous or the sub-Tenon in rabbits. For pharmacokinetic study, rabbits were sacrificed periodically and then TA in blood and ocular tissues (retina/choroids, vitreous, and aqueous humor) were measured over 91d. For toxicological study, clinical signs, slit-lamp microscopic examination, ophthalmological test were performed. The eyeballs and surrounding tissues were collected and fixed with glutaraldehyde-formalin solution, and then paraffin embedded for histological investigation. RESULTS: Higher levels of TA were distributed in the intraocular tissues when injected into the vitreous compared to the sub-Tenon. Conversely, TA level was remarkably lower in the rabbits which received intravitreal TA injections than those treated with sub-Tenon injection throughout the study period in plasma. Optical discharge probably caused by systemic circulation of TA was observed by receiving sub-Tenon TA injection. Meanwhile, technic-associated toxicological ocular symptoms and findings were more frequently observed in intravitreal injection than in sub-Tenon injection. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in kinetics and distribution of TA in vitreous body, aqueous humor and plasma, between the two injection methods. Although further study is needed to explain the species difference between human and rabbit, it is assumed that the difference in the frequency of intraocular pressure elevation and cataract formation by TA between the two injection methods are directly related to the TA concentrations in aqueous humor and vitreous body in each injection methods. Systemic toxicity and technic-associated toxicity are also closely related to kinetics of TA in plasma and each injection method itself, respectively. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.
AIM: To compare the differences in kinetics, distribution, and toxicity of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) between the injection methods, sub-Tenon and intravitreal injections in rabbit ocular tissues. METHODS:TA was injected into the vitreous or the sub-Tenon in rabbits. For pharmacokinetic study, rabbits were sacrificed periodically and then TA in blood and ocular tissues (retina/choroids, vitreous, and aqueous humor) were measured over 91d. For toxicological study, clinical signs, slit-lamp microscopic examination, ophthalmological test were performed. The eyeballs and surrounding tissues were collected and fixed with glutaraldehyde-formalin solution, and then paraffin embedded for histological investigation. RESULTS: Higher levels of TA were distributed in the intraocular tissues when injected into the vitreous compared to the sub-Tenon. Conversely, TA level was remarkably lower in the rabbits which received intravitreal TA injections than those treated with sub-Tenon injection throughout the study period in plasma. Optical discharge probably caused by systemic circulation of TA was observed by receiving sub-Tenon TA injection. Meanwhile, technic-associated toxicological ocular symptoms and findings were more frequently observed in intravitreal injection than in sub-Tenon injection. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in kinetics and distribution of TA in vitreous body, aqueous humor and plasma, between the two injection methods. Although further study is needed to explain the species difference between human and rabbit, it is assumed that the difference in the frequency of intraocular pressure elevation and cataract formation by TA between the two injection methods are directly related to the TA concentrations in aqueous humor and vitreous body in each injection methods. Systemic toxicity and technic-associated toxicity are also closely related to kinetics of TA in plasma and each injection method itself, respectively. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.
Entities:
Keywords:
corticosteroid(s); injection; ophthalmic drug delivery; pharmacokinetics; toxicity
Authors: Paul M Beer; Sophie J Bakri; Ravinder J Singh; Weiguo Liu; George B Peters; Michael Miller Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Michael R Robinson; Susan S Lee; Hyuncheol Kim; Stephanie Kim; Robert J Lutz; Craig Galban; Peter M Bungay; Peng Yuan; Nam Sun Wang; Jonghyeon Kim; Karl G Csaky Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Sreekanth Sreekantam; Trystan Macdonald; Pearse A Keane; Dawn A Sim; Philip I Murray; Alastair K Denniston Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 4.638