| Literature DB >> 33344111 |
R Scott Van Pelt1, John Tatarko2, Thomas E Gill3, Chunping Chang4, Junran Li5, Iyasu G Eibedingil6, Marcos Mendez7.
Abstract
In drylands around the world, ephemeral lakes (playas) are common. Dry, wind-erodible playa sediments are potent local and regional sources of dust and PM10 (airborne particles with diameters less than 10 μm). Dust clouds often cause sudden and/or prolonged loss of visibility to travelers on downwind roadways. Lordsburg Playa, in southwestern New Mexico, USA is bisected by Interstate Highway 10. Dust storms emanating from the playa have been responsible for numerous visibility-related road closures (including 39 road closures between 2012 and 2019) causing major economic losses, in addition to well over a hundred dust-related vehicle crashes causing at least 41 lost lives in the last 53 years. In order to improve understanding of the surfaces responsible for the dust emissions, we investigated the critical wind friction velocity thresholds and the dust emissivities of surfaces representing areas typical of Lordsburg Playa's stream deltas, shorelines, and ephemerally flooded lakebed using a Portable In-Situ Wind ERosion Laboratory (PI-SWERL). Mean threshold friction velocities for PM10 entrainment ranged from less than 0.30 m s- 1 for areas in the delta and shoreline to greater than 0.55 m s- 1 for ephemerally flooded areas of the lakebed. Similarly, we quantified mean PM10 vertical flux rates ranging from less than 500 μg m- 2 s- 1 for ephemerally flooded areas of lakebed to nearly 25,000 μg m- 2 s- 1 for disturbed delta surfaces. The unlimited PM10 supply of the relatively coarse sediments along the western shoreline is problematic and indicates that this may be the source area for longer-term visibility reducing dust events and should be a focus area for dust mitigation efforts.Entities:
Keywords: Dust storms; Highway safety; PM10; Surface emissivity; Visibility; Wind erosion
Year: 2020 PMID: 33344111 PMCID: PMC7728642 DOI: 10.1186/s40677-020-00171-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Geoenvironmental Disasters ISSN: 2197-8670
Fig. 1Satellite image of Lordsburg Playa dissected by Interstate 10 showing the locations (green diamonds) of surfaces that were tested with the PI-SWERL as listed in Table 1 and the NMDOT weather stations (NM003 and NM004) (yellow diamonds)
Summary of the hybrid PI-SWERL test used to assess surface dust emissivities and threshold friction velocities
| Cumulative Test Time (s) | Interval Time (s) | Operation |
|---|---|---|
| 0–540 | 540 | Aspirate PI-SWERL bell and record PM10 concentration |
| 0–60 | 60 | No ring movement |
| 61–105 | 45 | Accelerate ring to 2000 RPM |
| 106–165 | 60 | Maintain ring at 2000 RPM |
| 166–210 | 45 | Accelerate ring to 3000 RPM |
| 211–270 | 60 | Maintain ring at 3000 RPM |
| 271–315 | 45 | Accelerate ring to 4000 RPM |
| 316–375 | 60 | Maintain ring at 4000 RPM |
| 376–420 | 45 | Accelerate ring to 5000 RPM |
| 421–480 | 60 | Maintain ring at 5000 RPM |
| 481–540 | 60 | Decelerate ring to 0 RPM |
Fig. 2Dust clouds blowing across Interstate Highway 10 on Lordsburg Playa while the highway is open to automobile and truck traffic, March 22, 2016
Fig. 3PI-SWERL in test configuration on an undisturbed surface at the eastern beach area (EPL)
Mean and standard deviation of longitude, latitude, percent sand, silt, clay and PM10 for the surface sediment samples at the test sites
| Site (Surface Class)a | Longitude | Latitude | Sand | Silt | Clay | PM10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Degrees W | Degrees N | % | % | % | % | ||
| AD1 (D) | Mean St. Dev. | 108.854 1.91 E-5 | 32.255 8.64 E-5 | 17.79 1.01 | 69.2 1.10 | 12.29 0.50 | 41.30 1.36 |
| AD2 (D) | Mean St. Dev. | 108.868 3.86 E-5 | 32.254 3.47 E-5 | 28.64 4.94 | 57.42 4.16 | 13.94 3.16 | 42.25 7.40 |
| AD3 (D) | Mean St. Dev. | 108.878 8.03 E-5 | 32.267 5.4 E-5 | 18.01 1.08 | 70.10 1.29 | 11.90 1.32 | 45.24 3.41 |
| AD2 (L) | Mean St. Dev. | 108.868 1.04 E-4 | 32.254 3.98 E-5 | 30.66 5.37 | 57.16 7.05 | 12.18 1.67 | 37.57 2.62 |
| RFP (L) | Mean St. Dev. | 108.943 5.89 E-4 | 32.242 6.68 E-4 | 29.02 12.27 | 62.27 12.00 | 8.70 0.51 | 33.72 2.93 |
| PC (L) | Mean St. Dev. | 108.908 3.18 E-4 | 32.322 2.47 E-4 | 17.52 3.88 | 54.62 1.95 | 27.85 2.81 | 57.73 4.55 |
| RFP (B) | Mean St. Dev. | 108.944 -- | 32.242 -- | 56.72 -- | 36.17 -- | 7.11 -- | 25.22 -- |
| EB (B) | Mean St. Dev. | 108.832 1.65 E-4 | 32.333 7.11 E-5 | 41.33 7.13 | 45.35 6.13 | 13.32 1.70 | 42.55 7.06 |
| WB (B) | Mean St. Dev | 108.933 1.93 E-5 | 32.315 4.41 E-5 | 84.59 13.00 | 12.23 10.76 | 3.17 2.24 | 10.80 8.83 |
asurface classes are D = Delta, L = Lake, and B = Beach
Fig. 4Aerial photograph of area on the west of Lordsburg Playa showing erosional head cutting in the left portions of the picture and subsequent deposition of eroded sediment on the playa surface in the right-hand portions of the image
Surface class (Delta, Lake, or Beach), disturbance class (Undisturbed or Disturbed), and mean and standard deviation of threshold friction velocity (u*t), friction velocity at which the NAAQS standard would be exceeded in a 30 m tall column of air (u*exc), friction velocity at which the maximum rate of PM10 vertical flux is observed (u*maxQ), the maximum rate of PM10 vertical flux observed (Max Q), and the total PM10 vertical flux for the nine minute PI-SWERL test (Tot Q) of each sample site
| Site | Surf. Class | Disturb. Class | u*t (m s−1) | u*exc (m s−1) | u*maxQ (m s−1) | Max Q (μg m−2 s− 1) | Tot Q (μg m−2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD1 | D | U | Mean St. Dev. | 0.31 0.02 | 0.80 0.02 | 0.81 0.00 | 1325.48 919.87 | 84,217 69,106 |
| AD1 | D | D | Mean St. Dev. | 0.31 0.02 | 0.62 0.07 | 0.81 0.01 | 11,030.94 5498.17 | 845,554 5,168,485 |
| AD2 | D | U | Mean St. Dev. | 0.26 0.05 | 0.74 0.12 | 0.80 0.02 | 3098.75 2021.42 | 193,221 131,854 |
| AD3 | D | U | Mean St. Dev. | 0.24 0.05 | 0.60 0.15 | 0.80 0.02 | 1248.26 8697.52 | 999,201 832,504 |
| AD3 | D | D | Mean St. Dev. | 0.31 0.02 | 0.50 0.03 | 0.68 0.05 | 24,977.63 1778.07 | 2,226,249 682,823 |
| AD2 | L | U | Mean St. Dev. | 0.31 0.01 | -- -- | 0.80 0.00 | 223.60 36.49 | 16,733 2287 |
| RFP | L | U | Mean St. Dev. | 0.36 0.06 | -- -- | 0.81 0.00 | 476.06 406.79 | 45,648 77,958 |
| PC | L | U | Mean St. Dev. | 0.56 0.10 | 0.81 -- | 0.80 0.02 | 561.84 717.75 | 36,857 49,034 |
| RFP | B | U | Mean St. Dev. | 0.39 -- | 0.77 -- | 0.81 -- | 2450.36 -- | 288,993 -- |
| EB | B | U | Mean St. Dev. | 0.30 0.10 | 0.72 0.08 | 0.81 0.00 | 7561.78 12,282.01 | 788,012 1,266,773 |
| WB | B | U | Mean St. Dev. | 0.28 0.04 | 0.50 0.05 | 0.80 0.02 | 17,182.49 6844.97 | 2,727,300 1,084,141 |
Fig. 5PI-SWERL test response curve showing PM10 supply limitations. The dashed line represents the friction velocity (u*) and the solid line is the instantaneous vertical flux of PM10. This test was from an area that is ephemerally flooded (L)
Fig. 6PI-SWERL test response curve showing no PM10 supply limitations once threshold friction velocity (u*t) has been exceeded. The dashed line represents the friction velocity (u*) and the solid line is the instantaneous vertical flux of PM10. This test was from the western beach area (WPL)