Literature DB >> 33343401

Impact of Ringer's Solution Challenge Stress to Immunostimulatory Experiment, Insights From Japanese Flounder.

Jinxiang Liu1,2,3, Zan Li1, Yujue Wang1, Quanqi Zhang1,2,3.   

Abstract

Ringer's or phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solution buffer usually was used as dilution butter in intraperitoneal injection. Stress could activate immune response, inflammatory response and glycogen metabolic process. The impact of solution buffer as a stressor to immune system was ignored in immunostimulatory experiment. In this report, we tested the hypothesis that the innate immune response and glycogen metabolic process were altered when it were challenged with Ringer's in Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). RNA-seq was performed after challenge with Ringer's at 8 h and 48 h. The data revealed that the expression profiles of blood, gill, and kidney were significantly changed. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, and energy metabolic and immune-related genes were up-regulated or down-regulated obviously. GO and KEGG analyses showed that DEGs were mainly enriched in innate immune terms and pathways. Weighted gene co-expression networks analysis (WGCNA) also indicated the highest association module with stress. A total of 16 genes were detected in the gray module, which were immune-related and metabolic-related genes. These results provided fundamental information on intraperitoneal injection with solution buffer. It offered useful clues to further explore the functional mechanism of stress and immunity.
Copyright © 2020 Liu, Li, Wang and Zhang.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA-seq; Ringer’s; glycolysis; immune response; stress

Year:  2020        PMID: 33343401      PMCID: PMC7746848          DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.612036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Physiol        ISSN: 1664-042X            Impact factor:   4.566


Introduction

Stress is a general term applying to a situation in which organism is subjected to a challenge (Zhang et al., 2012). The stressors induced stress response can be mainly classified into different types. Firstly, physical and environmental stressors, including injuries, manipulations, handing, water temperature, dissolved oxygen, nitrogen compounds, salinity, pH, contaminants, and pathogens. Secondly, social and symbolic stressors, such as dominance, crowding, aggressiveness, and threat. Thirdly, acute and chronic stressors, for instance, predation, and fighting (Tort, 2011). It was demonstrated that stress could suppress or enhance the pathways involved in immune response (Dhabhar et al., 1995; Dhabhar, 2002). Stress also caused a wide range of physiological mechanisms except for immune, including the changes of gene and protein, metabolism, energetics, endocrine, and neural (Tort, 2011). In previous studies, it was reported that cytokines and neuropeptides performed roles in both neuroendocrine and immune systems after challenged with stress in fish (Ottaviani and Franceschi, 1996). The innate immunity and inflammatory response could be activated or enhanced after stress. It was investigated that the lysozyme and C3 was increased after acute stress in rainbow trout and sea bream (Oriol Sunyer and Tort, 1995; Demers and Bayne, 1997). The mechanism of these interactions has been mostly studied in higher vertebrates, but less information were available in fish. The studies focused on the regulation stimulated by high or low temperature. The normal expression profiles of kidney and gill were changed after challenged with high temperature in rainbow trout and Yesso scallop, and immune-related genes were up- and down-regulated (Huang et al., 2018; Jiang et al., 2018). A series of evidences indicated the immune response stimulated by stress mediated by cortisol and glucocorticoids. Immune suppression was correlated with high level of cortisol in sea bream and red porgy (Tort et al., 1998; Montero et al., 1999; MacKenzie et al., 2006; Rotllant and Tort, 2010). In a recent research, obvious oxidative burst was found in juvenile Chinook salmon leukocytes, and followed the cortisol concentration significantly increased after stress treatment (Herron et al., 2018). Glucocorticoid could also increase leukocytes of coho salmon after stress (Maule and Schreck, 1991). Ringer’s or PBS was usually used for immunostimulatory experiment as solution buffer to dilute bacteria. In fact, Ringer’s challenge was a stress, which could induce immune response. We should recognized it correctly, which might produce noise and interfere the result during immunostimulatory experiment. It could be recognized correctly, and exclude the noise caused by stress during immunostimulatory experiment. In our study, RNA-seq was used the estimate the influence of Ringer’s challenge at 8 h and 48 h post injection. Immune-related tissues were selected to detect the expression change after injection at transcriptome level. We demonstrated that the genes related to inflammatory response, innate immune, and metabolic process changed obviously. The results could provide a theoretical basis for the immunostimulatory experiment, especially intraperitoneal injection. The impact of solution buffer should not be ignored. It could be a reference for researchers to choose the better experimental method among injection, soaking, and feeding.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

All the experiments were conducted according to the Guidelines for the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Ocean University of China.

Fish and Sample Collection

The Japanese flounders used for the experiment were collected by the Yellow Sea Aquatic Product Co., Ltd., Shandong. A total of 12 healthy 1-year-old individuals were randomly selected for challenge experiment. The fish were divided into two groups denoted as the blank control group (BC group) and treatment group, which included four and eight individuals, respectively. During the experiment, the treatment group received an intraperitoneal injection of 1 mL sterilized Ringer’s solution buffer, and the BC group did not receive any treatment. The fish were maintained in sterilized seawater with sufficient oxygen after challenge. Before sampling, fish were anesthetized with MS-222. Four individuals were randomly collected from the BC group at 0 h post injection. At 8 h and 48 h post injection, four individuals were randomly collected from the treatment group. Tissues from blood, gill and kidney were collected and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. After collection, the samples were tested to exclude the infection of pathogen (Li et al., 2018).

RNA Isolation, cDNA Library Construction and Illumina Sequencing

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol, treated with RNase-free DNase I (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) to degrade genomic DNA, and then frozen at −80°C. RNAClean RNA Kit was applied to remove proteins. The quality and quantity were evaluated via 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometry using NanoPhotometer Pearl (Implen GmbH, Munich, Germany) and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States). The RNA-seq libraries of different tissues and time points were constructed by using Illumina TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instruction. A total of 18 libraries were constructed, including BL-BC-1/2, BL-8 h-1/2, BL-48 h-1/2, G-BC-1/2, G-8 h-1/2, G-48 h-1/2, K-BC-1/2, K-8 h-1/2, and K-48 h-1/2. During the library construction, two biological replicates of each sample were used. Equal molar ratios of RNA from any two of four individuals were pooled as one replication at each time point in the same tissue. The remaining two individuals were pooled as another replication. Then the libraries were subjected to paired-end sequencing of 150 bp on the Illumina HiSeq 4000.

Data Processing and Bioinformatics Analysis

Raw reads were cleaned by removing adaptors and low quality sequences using FastQC. TopHat was used to map the reads to the reference genome. Default values were set for the parameters of TopHat read mapping (Kim and Salzberg, 2011). Then the mapping files were analyzed using Cufflinks to assemble the reads into transcripts for each dataset (Roberts et al., 2011). Complete transcripts were obtained by merging the assemblies of all datasets using Cuffmerge. Gene expression levels were measured by Fragments Per Kilobase Million (FPKM) (Trapnell et al., 2012). The expressed genes were annotated by NR, Swiss-Prot, GO, and KOG databases (Kanehisa et al., 2008).

DEGs Identification, GO and KEGG Enrichment

Differentially expressed genes among BC groups and treatment groups at different time point and different tissues were detected by FPKM. The FPKM was calculated by Cuffdiff. Genes with an adjusted log2FoldChange ≥ 1 or log2FoldChange ≤ −1, and P < 0.01 were considered as DEGs. The DEGs were enriched by GO terms and KEGG categories using DAVID (Huang et al., 2008). The visualization of global similarities and differences were accomplished by MA plot, and R packages were used for these analysis. The significance of GO and KEGG enrichment analysis was determined via modified Fisher’s exact test (EASE ≤ 0.05).

Construction of Weighted Gene Co-expression Network

Gene co-expression networks were constructed using the WGCNA approach with R packages. Genes expressed in different tissues and time points were retained for co-expression network construction by WGCNA (Langfelder and Horvath, 2008). The co-expression adjacency matrix were formed based on correlation between each gene (genes FPKM < 0.5 were deleted). Cluster analysis was performed with flashClust function from the package flashClust, and modules were identified with the cutreeHybrid function of the package Dynamic Tree Cut. The calculation of module eigengene (ME) were carried out by the MEs function of WGCNA package. Gene modules with common expression patterns associated with particular trait were detected based on the correlation between ME and trait.

qRT-PCR Validation

A total of nine DEGs were selected for qRT-PCR validation. Specific primer pairs were designed by IDT (Supplementary Table 1). qRT-PCR was performed using the SYBR Premix Ex TaqII on LightCycler 480. β-actin was selected as reference gene. Amplification conditions were as follows: 95°C for 60 s and then 45 cycles of 95°C for 5 s, 60°C for 30 s for 45 s. The relative quantities were calculated using the 2–ΔΔCt comparative Ct method. The Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was performed between qRT-PCR assay and RNA-seq data.

Results and Discussion

Illumina Sequencing and Reads Mapping

A total of 18 libraries were sequenced, and 740,615,986 raw reads were acquired. Table 1 shown the clean reads, valid ratio and mapped reads ratio of each library after quality control. The paired-end reads were mapped to the reference genome, and more than 85% of them were mapped to the P. olivaceus genome. Meanwhile, more than 15,000 genes were annotated in each sample.
TABLE 1

Summary statistics of transcriptome sequencing data.

SampleRaw readsClean readsQ30Mapped reads ratio (%)
BL-BC-1393860503824996096.6185.4
BL-BC-2378931323647129896.2586.2
BL-8h-1389684683789132496.8784.8
BL-8h-2430188824216774496.5385.6
BL-48h-1433780884184777096.9386.7
BL-48h-2348151623369316496.6685.1
G-BC-1466232324480881096.0984.0
G-BC-2357570943418835896.3683.1
G-8h-1373588643665813096.5484.2
G-8h-2446399984328896896.4283.5
G-48h-1503022304919428696.3381.7
G-48h-2465665144429026896.3483.2
K-BC-1346549743366013096.5481.8
K-BC-2433368724155202696.4980.6
K-8h-1488708044783983896.7180.0
K-8h-2419771283979442496.3782.0
K-48h-1321953423152050296.3885.1
K-48h-2408731523912405096.3380.3
Summary statistics of transcriptome sequencing data.

DEGs Identification Between Control and Treatment Groups

MA plot analysis was conducted between different time points and BC groups in blood, gill and kidney. It was shown that most of genes demonstrated distributed in diagonal, and only parts of them deviated (Figure 1). DEGs were identified after Ringer’s challenge. In blood, 317 DEGs were found at 8 h post injection, which contained 184 genes were up-regulated and 133 genes were down-regulated. 369 DEGs were detected at 48 h post injection, including 152 up-regulated genes and 217 down-regulated genes (Figure 2A and Supplementary Table 2). In gill, 526 and 379 DEGs were found at 8 h and 48 h post injection, respectively. Specifically, 322 genes were up-regulated and 204 genes were down-regulated at 8 h post injection. 198 genes were up-regulated and 181 genes were down-regulated at 48 h post injection (Figure 2B and Supplementary Table 3). In kidney, a total of 462 and 1264 DEGs were identified at 8 h and 48 h post injection compared with BC group. 192 genes were up-regulated and 270 genes were down-regulated at 8 h post injection. 839 genes were up-regulated and 425 genes were down-regulated at 48 h post injection (Figure 2C and Supplementary Table 4). The results indicated that the expression profile had been changed after challenge with Ringer’s solution buffer. Usually, Ringer’s or PBS were used for diluting bacterial fluid during intraperitoneal injection and immunostimulatory experiment. It could be a kind of stress when Ringer’s or PBS buffer was injected as control group. Stress might cause a series of immune response (Dhabhar et al., 1995; Dhabhar, 2002), and generate noise during the experiment. It was important to choose the better method in challenge experiment.
FIGURE 1

MA plot analysis between BC group vs. 8 h and BC group vs. 48 h post injection in blood, gill, and kidney. BC, blank control; BL, blood; G, gill; K, kidney.

FIGURE 2

Venn diagram shown the numbers of expressed genes and DEGs in different tissues after challenged with Ringer’s. (A) DEGs in blood. (B) DEGs in gill. (C) DEGs in kidney.

MA plot analysis between BC group vs. 8 h and BC group vs. 48 h post injection in blood, gill, and kidney. BC, blank control; BL, blood; G, gill; K, kidney. Venn diagram shown the numbers of expressed genes and DEGs in different tissues after challenged with Ringer’s. (A) DEGs in blood. (B) DEGs in gill. (C) DEGs in kidney.

GO and KEGG Functional Analysis of DEGs

Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) analyses were performed on DEGs at different time points in different tissues. The DEGs were significantly enriched in several GO terms in biological process, cellular component and molecular function levels. In blood, the terms involved in innate immune response, inflammatory response and immune system process were enrich significantly from 317 DEGs at 8 h post injection. Meanwhile, the terms related to immune response were enriched from 369 DEGs at 48 h post injection, including inflammatory response, innate immune response, defensing response to virus and TLR signaling pathway (Figure 3A and Table 2). In gill, the terms about inflammatory response, glycolytic metabolism and ATP metabolic process were detected from DEGs after 8 h and 48 h challenge (Figure 3B and Table 3). In kidney, it was found that there were some terms related to metabolic process, response to mechanical stimulus and immune response at 8 h post injection. Besides, an amount of genes were enriched to the terms about inflammatory response, immune response, and signaling pathways about immune response (Figure 3C and Table 4). Basing on the results of GO enrichment, it was investigated that the stimulation of Ringer’s challenge changed the expression of genes involved in inflammatory. In addition, the genes related to glycolytic metabolism were also changed. Our results was consisted with the previous studies on stress, the immune-related genes and glycolytic metabolism-related genes were changed in other stresses. Meanwhile, inflammatory factors even were up-regulated (Calcagni and Elenkov, 2006; Rogatsky and Ivashkiv, 2006; Borghetti et al., 2009). It was a kind of stress after challenged by Ringer’s, the endocrine system and immune system could be regulated by the stress. The normal state in organism was broken, which caused the change of genes involved in these functions.
FIGURE 3

GO enrichment analysis of DEGs in different tissues. DEGs were annotated to different GO terms. (A) GO enrichment of DEGs in blood at 8 h and 48 h post injection. (B) GO enrichment of DEGs in gill at 8 h and 48 h post injection. (C) GO enrichment of DEGs in kidney at 8 h and 48 h post injection.

TABLE 2

DEGs associated with immune response in blood.

GeneAnnotationP-Value
BL-BC vs 8h
RBLL-rhamnose-binding lectin CSL2-like5.00E-05
MRC2C-type mannose receptor 25.00E-05
SIG15Sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin 150.003
TLR5Toll-like receptor 50.0001
PRS57Serine protease 570.0076
CLC5AC-type lectin domain family 5 member A5.00E-05
TCBT-cell receptor beta, type 15.00E-05
CCL2C-C motif chemokine 20.01115
XLOC_009588Galectin-3-like0.0036
CD2T-cell surface antigen CD2-like isoform X10.00245
NITRNovel immune-type receptor5.00E-05
IL21Rinterleukin-21 receptor-like isoform X15.00E-05
HHLA2HERV-H LTR-associating protein 2-like5.00E-05
NfkbidNF-kappa-B inhibitor delta-like0.01315
CD81CD81 antigen0.01425
BL-BC vs 48h
TLR5Toll-like receptor 55.00E-05
TNIP1TNFAIP3-interacting protein 1-like0.00525
MRC2C-type mannose receptor 20.00215
IL17RBInterleukin-17 receptor B5.00E-05
TLR2Toll-like receptor 25.00E-05
TLR1Toll-like receptor 15.00E-05
CD9CD9 antigen0.0016
CLECC-lectin-A0.0001
XLOC_002185Immunoglobulin light chain 20.00345
NLRC3NOD-like receptor C5.00E-05
TNFRSF11Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 11A0.01615
TLR3Toll-like receptor 30.0002
APOL6Apolipoprotein L65.00E-05
XLOC_013403Galactose-specific lectin nattectin5.00E-05
IL21RInterleukin-21 receptor5.00E-05
APOL3Apolipoprotein L65.00E-05
TLR7Toll-like receptor 70.0013
CCL20C-C motif chemokine 200.0102
TABLE 3

DEGs associated with immune response in gill.

GeneAnnotationP-Value
G-BC vs 8h
CLEC3AC-type lectin domain family 3 member A5.00E-05
CCL4C-C motif chemokine 40.01045
SOX10Transcription factor SOX-105.00E-05
IL34Interleukin-340.0198
CCL20C-C motif chemokine 200.0022
BCAP31B-cell receptor-associated protein 315.00E-05
B2L12Bcl-2-like protein 125.00E-05
TLR5Toll-like receptor 55.00E-05
TNFRSF1ATumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1A0.0171
IL13R2Interleukin-13 receptor subunit alpha-25.00E-05
FCGBPIgGFc-binding protein5.00E-05
HHLA2HERV-H LTR-associating protein 2-like5.00E-05
SOCS5Suppressor of cytokine signaling 50.00405
CASP9Caspase-95.00E-05
CD276CD276 antigen5.00E-05
BL-BC vs 48h
CCL4C-C motif chemokine 40.0022
LAG3Lymphocyte activation gene 3 protein5.00E-05
SOCS3Suppressor of cytokine signaling 35.00E-05
CCL19C-C motif chemokine 195.00E-05
RORANuclear receptor ROR-alpha0.0041
NPNTNephronectin5.00E-05
NAL12NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 120.00265
CD276CD276 antigen5.00E-05
CCL20C-C motif chemokine 200.0117
TABLE 4

DEGs associated with immune response in kidney.

GeneAnnotationP-Value
K-BC vs 8h
GLECGalactose-specific lectin nattectin-like0.02125
TNIP1TNFAIP3-interacting protein 10.0008
XLOC_012310Immunoglobulin light chain 25.00E-05
TUSC2Tumor suppressor candidate 20.00705
HSP60Heat shock protein 60 kDa5.00E-05
CD81CD81 antigen5.00E-05
IL21RInterleukin-21 receptor5.00E-05
CD34Hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen CD340.01775
CD59CD59 glycoprotein-like isoform X15.00E-05
VSIG1V-set and immunoglobulin domain-containing protein 10.00035
K-BC vs 48h
TLR13Toll-like receptor 135.00E-05
IL11Interleukin-110.0222
XLOC_012310Immunoglobulin light chain 25.00E-05
BOKABcl-2-related ovarian killer protein homolog A5.00E-05
ISLR2Immunoglobulin superfamily containing leucine-rich repeat protein 25.00E-05
IGSF8Immunoglobulin superfamily member 85.00E-05
CD9CD9 antigen0.0038
IL8Interleukin-85.00E-05
HSPBHeat shock protein beta-15.00E-05
CD28T-cell-specific surface glycoprotein CD285.00E-05
IGSF3Immunoglobulin superfamily member 30.002
CD97CD97 antigen5.00E-05
CD109CD109 antigen5.00E-05
IGLL5Immunoglobulin lambda-like polypeptide 55.00E-05
TLR9Toll-like receptor 95.00E-05
IL17RBInterleukin-17 receptor B0.0009
TLR8Toll-like receptor 85.00E-05
CD2T-cell surface antigen CD25.00E-05
CD82CD82 antigen5.00E-05
CD267CD276 antigen homolog5.00E-05
TCB2T-cell receptor beta, type 25.00E-05
SIK2Serine/threonine-protein kinase SIK25.00E-05
TNIP1TNFAIP3-interacting protein 10.00795
TLR5Toll-like receptor 55.00E-05
NLRCNOD-like receptor C5.00E-05
IL5RAInterleukin-5 receptor subunit alpha Interleukin-1 receptor5.00E-05
IL1RAPL1BAccessory protein-like 1-B-like isoform X40.00975
VSIG1V-set and immunoglobulin domain-containing protein 10.00205
SERP1Stress-associated endoplasmic reticulum protein 15.00E-05
TLX1T-cell leukemia homeobox protein 15.00E-05
GO enrichment analysis of DEGs in different tissues. DEGs were annotated to different GO terms. (A) GO enrichment of DEGs in blood at 8 h and 48 h post injection. (B) GO enrichment of DEGs in gill at 8 h and 48 h post injection. (C) GO enrichment of DEGs in kidney at 8 h and 48 h post injection. DEGs associated with immune response in blood. DEGs associated with immune response in gill. DEGs associated with immune response in kidney. KEGG pathway enrichment were analyzed in DEGs. A total of four signaling pathways were enriched significantly in blood (P < 0.05) (Figure 4A). In gill, six signaling pathways were detected (P < 0.05) (Figure 4B). In kidney, 10 signaling pathways were enriched significantly (P < 0.05) (Figure 4C). In these pathways, immune-related signaling pathways were significantly enriched, including inflammatory bowel disease, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, p53 signaling pathway, and TNF signaling pathway. Interestingly, metabolic-related pathways were also found after challenge, such as metabolic pathways, carbon metabolism, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, and fatty acid metabolism. The proteins inducing apoptosis and regulating inflammatory factors would be increased after stress challenge (Dios et al., 2007). It was necessary to supply energy by glycolysis or metabolism if apoptosis and inflammatory response were activated. We speculated that ATP was necessary to participate apoptosis and the phosphorylation of immune-related kinase when the stress of Ringer’s injection occurred. The process of immune response was accompanied with glycolysis or gluconeogenesis.
FIGURE 4

KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs in different tissues. (A) KEGG enrichment in blood. (B) KEGG enrichment in gill. (C) KEGG enrichment in kidney.

KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs in different tissues. (A) KEGG enrichment in blood. (B) KEGG enrichment in gill. (C) KEGG enrichment in kidney.

Weighted Gene Co-expression Networks Analysis

Weighted gene co-expression networks analysis was constructed basing on all the genes expressed in three tissues. The correlation matrix and adjacency matrix of the gene expression profile of the challenged groups were calculated according to the basic idea of WGCNA. The challenged groups of 8 h and 48 h were delimited as stress groups. Then they were transformed into a topological overlap matrix (TOM) and obtained a system clustering tree of genes by gene-gene non-ω similarity (Figure 5A). The hierarchical average linkage clustering method was used to identify the gene modules of each gene network. A total of 12 gene modules were recognized in stress groups (Figure 5A). The highest association in the Module-trait relationship was found in gray module (r2 = 0.86, P = 4e-06) (Figure 5B). The ME gray module was selected as the module related to stress. In this module, 16 genes were chosen and were considered to be down-regulated stress (Table 5). The selected genes were immune-related and metabolic-related genes. It was consistent with the GO and KEGG analysis.
FIGURE 5

WGCNA analysis of the expressed genes. (A) Gene clustering tree (dendrogram) obtained by hierarchical clustering of adjacency-based dissimilarity. The colored row below the dendrogram indicates module membership identified by the dynamic tree cut method with module colors. (B) Module-feature associations. Each row corresponds to a module eigengene and each column to a trait. Each cell contains the corresponding correlation in the first line and the P-value in the second line. The table is color-coded by correlation according to the color legend.

TABLE 5

Genes selected by WGCNA.

GeneGS. StressP. GS. Stress
Retrotransposable element Tf2 155 kDa protein type 1–0.8739743322.14E-06
RNA-directed DNA polymerase from mobile element jockey–0.8674444333.14E-06
Zinc finger protein 45-like0.8394997621.32E-05
Unnamed protein product0.788399980.000101502
Transposable element Tc1 transposase–0.6773497140.002013609
Myotubularin-related protein 7-like–0.6254679250.00550202
Probable RNA-directed DNA polymerase from transposon BS–0.583506110.011018785
Interferon alpha-inducible protein 27–0.5397702390.02077184
NUAK family SNF1-like kinase 2-like0.4890457950.039434092
Bifunctional methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/cyclohydrolase, mitochondrial-like–0.4770342550.045311857
Interferon alpha-inducible protein 27-like protein 2B like isoform X20.4285510420.075992385
Ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family member 10.3382641830.169757729
Uncharacterized protein0.3190362310.196904352
Neurexin-2-alpha-like0.2810910580.258508817
Interferon regulatory factor 3 variant 1–0.1890814350.452392985
Gamma-sarcoglycan-like0.1184635340.639662611
WGCNA analysis of the expressed genes. (A) Gene clustering tree (dendrogram) obtained by hierarchical clustering of adjacency-based dissimilarity. The colored row below the dendrogram indicates module membership identified by the dynamic tree cut method with module colors. (B) Module-feature associations. Each row corresponds to a module eigengene and each column to a trait. Each cell contains the corresponding correlation in the first line and the P-value in the second line. The table is color-coded by correlation according to the color legend. Genes selected by WGCNA. The expression patterns of nine genes (TLR5, TLR2, IL21R, IL34, B2L12, Caspase-9, HSP60, IL8, CD267) related with immune response were detected by qRT-PCR. Fold change was calculated by treatment group and control group. All the genes displayed consistent expression patterns both in qRT-PCR and FPKM (R = 0.7613, P < 0.01) (Figure 6).
FIGURE 6

Verification of the fold change both in qRT-PCR and FPKM after Ringer’s injection. (A–C) The fold change of DEGs in blood at 8 h and 48 h post injection. (D–F) The fold change of DEGs in gill at 8 h and 48 h post injection. (G–I) The fold change of DEGs in kidney at 8 h and 48 h post injection.

Verification of the fold change both in qRT-PCR and FPKM after Ringer’s injection. (A–C) The fold change of DEGs in blood at 8 h and 48 h post injection. (D–F) The fold change of DEGs in gill at 8 h and 48 h post injection. (G–I) The fold change of DEGs in kidney at 8 h and 48 h post injection. In conclusion, we demonstrated the change of expression profile post Ringer’s solution injection in Japanese flounder. The immune-related genes were up-regulated or down-regulated in different time points and different tissues. Besides, it was found that the genes involved in glycolysis/gluconeogenesis were also change after challenged with Ringer’s solution. These results indicated that the immune system and metabolic pathways were affected after Ringer’s solution challenge. This study revealed that Ringer’s solution buffer could influence immunostimulatory experiment during intraperitoneal injection.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Ocean University of China.

Author Contributions

JL and QZ conceived and designed the project, wrote and revised the manuscript. JL and ZL performed the experiments. JL and YW performed the data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  24 in total

Review 1.  Glucocorticoid modulation of cytokine signaling.

Authors:  I Rogatsky; L B Ivashkiv
Journal:  Tissue Antigens       Date:  2006-07

2.  Suppression subtraction hybridization (SSH) and macroarray techniques reveal differential gene expression profiles in brain of sea bream infected with nodavirus.

Authors:  S Dios; L Poisa-Beiro; A Figueras; B Novoa
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 4.407

3.  Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources.

Authors:  Da Wei Huang; Brad T Sherman; Richard A Lempicki
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Cortisol and glucose responses after acute stress by net handling in the sparid red porgy previously subjected to crowding stress

Authors: 
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.051

5.  Effects of stress on immune cell distribution. Dynamics and hormonal mechanisms.

Authors:  F S Dhabhar; A H Miller; B S McEwen; R L Spencer
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Transcriptomic responses to heat stress in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss head kidney.

Authors:  Jinqiang Huang; Yongjuan Li; Zhe Liu; Yujun Kang; Jianfu Wang
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.581

7.  Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq.

Authors:  Cole Trapnell; David G Hendrickson; Martin Sauvageau; Loyal Goff; John L Rinn; Lior Pachter
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Transcriptome analysis of the Yesso scallop, Patinopecten yessoensis gills in response to water temperature fluctuations.

Authors:  Weiwei Jiang; Fan Lin; Jianguang Fang; Yaping Gao; Meirong Du; Jinghui Fang; Wenhao Li; Zengjie Jiang
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.581

9.  Stress up-regulates oxidative burst in juvenile Chinook salmon leukocytes.

Authors:  Crystal L Herron; K M Cogliati; B P Dolan; A Munakata; C B Schreck
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.581

10.  KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment.

Authors:  Minoru Kanehisa; Michihiro Araki; Susumu Goto; Masahiro Hattori; Mika Hirakawa; Masumi Itoh; Toshiaki Katayama; Shuichi Kawashima; Shujiro Okuda; Toshiaki Tokimatsu; Yoshihiro Yamanishi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.