| Literature DB >> 33343213 |
Paolo Rosa1, Maxim Yu Proshchalykin2, Marek Halada3, Ulykpan Aibek4.
Abstract
An annotated checklist of the Chrysididae from Mongolia is provided. A revision of the bibliographical data is provied, since most of the collecting localities published for "Mongolia" refer to places currently located in China. The known Mongolian cuckoo wasp fauna counts 90 species in 18 genera and two subfamilies. Four genera and 57 species are recorded for the first time, including two species here described as new for science: Cleptes mongolicus Rosa, Halada & Agnoli, sp. nov. (Dornod) and Spinolia spinosa Rosa & Halada, sp. nov. (Bayankhongor). Paolo Rosa, Maxim Yu. Proshchalykin, Marek Halada, Ulykpan Aibek.Entities:
Keywords: Catalogue; Central Asia; Palaearctic region; new records
Year: 2020 PMID: 33343213 PMCID: PMC7723880 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.999.58536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zookeys ISSN: 1313-2970 Impact factor: 1.546
Figure 1.Administrative map of Mongolia (from Dathe and Proshchalykin (2016) and Proshchalykin (2017) modified). Aimags: 1 Bayan-Ulgii 2 Uvs 3 Khovd 4 Zavkhan 5 Govi-Altai 6 Khuvsgul 7 Arkhangai 8 Bayankhongor 9 Bulgan 10 Orkhon 11 Uvurkhangai 12 Umnugovi 13 Selenge 14 Darkhan-Uul 15 Tuv 16 Ulaanbaatar 17 Dundgovi 18 Khentii 19 Govi-Sümber 20 Dornogovi 21 Dornod 22 Sukhbaatar.
Records of Mongolian cuckoo wasp species by aimags.
| No. | Species | Aimags |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | 7 | |
| 2. | 7, 15 | |
| 3. | 8, 9, 12, 15, 20, 22 | |
| 4. | 4, 12, 15 | |
| 5. | 9 | |
| 6. | 13, 15 | |
| 7. | 7, 13, 15 | |
| 8. | 4, 7, 9, 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22 | |
| 9. | 4, 7–9, 13, 18 | |
| 10. | 7, 13 | |
| 11. | 7, 13, 15 | |
| 12. | 9 | |
| 13. | 12 | |
| 14. | 13, 15 | |
| 15. | 12, 20, 21 | |
| 16. | 12, 13, 15, 18, 21 | |
| 17. | 15 | |
| 18. | 15 | |
| 19. | 7 | |
| 20. | 15 | |
| 21. | 3 | |
| 22. | 4, 7, 9, 15, 20 | |
| 23. | 5, 15 | |
| 24. | 5, 15 | |
| 25. | 5 | |
| 26. | 7, 15 | |
| 27. | 12 | |
| 28. | 15 | |
| 29. | 7, 9 | |
| 30. | 7 | |
| 31. | 21 | |
| 32. | 7 | |
| 33. | 7 | |
| 34. | 15 | |
| 35. | 4 | |
| 36. | 4 | |
| 37. | 3, 8, 11 | |
| 38. | 21 | |
| 39. | 21 | |
| 40. | 7, 20 | |
| 41. | 22 | |
| 42. | 20 | |
| 43. | 4, 7 | |
| 44. | 15 | |
| 45. | 11 | |
| 46. | 5, 11, 12 | |
| 47. | 22 | |
| 48. | 4, 7, 8, 11, 13, 16, 18, 21, 22 | |
| 49. | 7–9, 16 | |
| 50. | 15 | |
| 51. | 4, 5, 8, 11, 12, 15, 20 | |
| 52. | 8, 15, 20 | |
| 53. | 8, 9, 13, 15, 18, 20, 21 | |
| 54. | 5 | |
| 55. | 7, 20–22 | |
| 56. | 5, 8, 13, 15, 16, 21, 22 | |
| 57. | 13, 15, 18 | |
| 58. | 3 | |
| 59. | 9, 12, 15, 21, 22 | |
| 60. | 4, 7, 13, 15 | |
| 61. | 7, 13, 15, 21, 22 | |
| 62. | 13 | |
| 63. | 11, 12, 20 | |
| 64. | 21, 22 | |
| 65. | 15, 16 | |
| 66. | 16 | |
| 67. | 7–9, 15, 22 | |
| 68. | 8, 20, 22 | |
| 69. | 7, 11, 15 | |
| 70. | 3 | |
| 71. | 7, 9, 12, 15, 20–22 | |
| 72. | without locality | |
| 73. | 7 | |
| 74. | 8, 11, 16, 22 | |
| 75. | 20 | |
| 76. | 20 | |
| 77. | 7, 8, 11, 15, 16, 18, 22 | |
| 78. | 8, 11, 12, 15, 16, 18–22 | |
| 79. | 8, 9, 13, 15, 21, 22 | |
| 80. | 15 | |
| 81. | 4, 9, 15, 18 | |
| 82. | 9, 13, 15, 16, 18, 21 | |
| 83. | 9, 15, 18, 21 | |
| 84. | 8, 9, 11–13, 15, 18, 21 | |
| 85. | 8 | |
| 86. | 5 | |
| 87. | 7, 9, 11, 15, 20 | |
| 88. | 8, 13, 15 | |
| 89. | without locality | |
| 90. | 13 |
Comment. Aimag designation as in Fig. 1.
Figure 2.sp. nov., female, holotype A habitus, dorsal view B head, frontal view C head and mesosoma, dorsal view D head and mesosoma, lateral view E metasoma, postero-lateral view F metasoma, dorso-lateral view. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.
Figure 3.sp. nov., male, paratype A habitus, dorsal view B head, frontal view C head and mesosoma, dorsal view D mesosoma, lateral view E metasoma, postero-lateral view F metasoma, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.
Figure 4.Linnaeus, habitus dorsal view A form A, ♀ B form B, ♀ C form A, ♂ D form B, ♂. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.
Figure 5.species, females A sp. nov., dorsal view B, dorsal view C, dorsal view D sp. nov., lateral view: arrows pointing at pronotal and propleural spines. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.
Figure 6.species, females, head in frontal view (A–C), and metasoma in dorsal view (D–F). A sp. nov. BC. D sp. nov. EF. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.
Species diversity of aimags in terms of area size, number of specimens and number of collecting sites.
| Aimags | Area, km2 | No. of species | No. of coll. sites | No. of specimens |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkhangai | 55 314 | 27 | 4 | 237 |
| Bayankhongor | 115 978 | 18 | 10 | 142 |
| Bulgan | 48 733 | 18 | 4 | 61 |
| Dornod | 123 597 | 19 | 4 | 228 |
| Dornogovi | 109 472 | 16 | 4 | 42 |
| Govi-Altai | 141 448 | 8 | 5 | 49 |
| Govi-Sümber | 5 542 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Khentii | 80 325 | 12 | 1 | 55 |
| Khovd | 76 061 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Selenge | 41 153 | 20 | 1 | 100 |
| Sukhbaatar | 82 286 | 17 | 4 | 79 |
| Tuv | 74 042 | 42 | 10 | 350 |
| Ulaanbaatar | 4 704 | 10 | 4 | 20 |
| Umnugovi | 165 381 | 13 | 7 | 34 |
| Uvurkhangai | 62 895 | 12 | 5 | 42 |
| Zavkhan | 82 457 | 11 | 1 | 21 |
Comment. are not known in Bayan-Ulgii, Darkhan-Uul, Dundgovi, Khuvsgul, Orkhon, and Uvs.