| Literature DB >> 33343029 |
Goh Si Guim1, Cindy Goh Wah Hoon1, Clara Anne Lim1, Huang Shoo Chay-Nancy1, Ashlynn Ai Li Ler1, Qi Xuan Lim1, Nurdiyana Binte Jaafar1, Cheryl Lim1, Faizus Sazzad1, Theo Kofidis1.
Abstract
The most apparent practical advantage of del Nido cardioplegia (DNC) is that it allows the surgeon a longer arrest period before a subsequent dose is needed, as opposed to the conventional St. Thomas' cardioplegia solution where the recommended ischemic time is ∼15-20 minutes. In this study, we explored the incidence of arrhythmia after cross-clamp removal as a surrogate for a safe myocardial ischemic time with the use of DNC in adult heart surgery. A total of 113 patients who had undergone heart valve repair and/or replacement surgery at the National University Hospital, Singapore, were investigated. This single-center retrospective study was conducted on a population where DNC had been used for myocardial protection between January 2017 and April 2019. Cardioplegia ischemic time interval groups were not significant predictors of postoperative arrhythmia, defibrillation, and intraoperative intra-aortic balloon pump usage. Crude comparison of postoperative outcomes showed no significant differences in any other postoperative variables, including mortality and total hospital stay. From the results of the present study, it appears that there is no optimal ischemic time interval for the administration of DNC within a 120-minute time period. It is likely that DNC has a redosing interval of, and may provide adequate myocardial protection, for up to 120 minutes. © Copyright 2020 AMSECT.Entities:
Keywords: arrhythmia; cardioplegia; defibrillation; del Nido; dosing; ischemia/reperfusion; statistics/regression analysis; timing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33343029 PMCID: PMC7728503 DOI: 10.1182/ject-2000025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Extra Corpor Technol ISSN: 0022-1058